Skip to content

T2 STRATOSPHERE™ Expandable Corpectomy System 436025300Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ENDCAP 436025300 EXTNDED 25 X 30MM 0 DEG · Class 2 · Implant

All models of T2 STRATOSPHERE Expandable Corpectomy System (52)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00643169651074), received between Nov 4, 2025 and Nov 4, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Mechanical Problem1
  • Product Quality Problem1

Patient problems

  • Oversedation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 4, 2025Mechanical Problem; Product Quality Problem; Mechanical Problem; Product Quality Problem

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING PRODUCTS USED IN SPINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SPINAL PROCEDURE, THE CAGE WOULD NOT EXPAND FULLY AND WOULD NOT COLLAPSE FULLY, AND THE ENDCAP WOULD ONLY ATTACH ON ONE SIDE AND KEPT FALLING OFF. THESE ISSUES ADDED CONSIDERABLE TIME TO THE OPERATION, EXPOSING THE PATIENT TO MULTIPLE PASSES OF INSTRUMENTATION PAST NERVE ROOTS AND UNNECESSARY EXPOSURE TO ANESTHETIC. BOTH PRODUCTS WERE EXPLANTED IN SAME SURGERY. THERE WERE NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS OR SYMPTOMS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE PROVISIONAL LOCKING RING ON THE INSERTER LOCKS THE GRUB SCREW ON THE CENTER STRUT. PRE-OP DIAGNOSIS OF PATIENT WAS L3 BURST FRACTURE, PROCEDURE INVOLVED IN THE EVENT WAS L3 CORPECTOMY, LEVELS IMPLANTED WAS L3 AND THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATION TO NOTE BUT IT DID ADD 90 MINS TO THE SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Oversedation

    MAUDE report 23463908 ↗

Other Spinal vertebral body replacement device devices

All Spinal vertebral body replacement device devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page