Skip to content

Visi-Pro™ PXB35-05-27-135Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · PXB35-05-27-135 STENT VISI PRO 035 V01 · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Visi-Pro (66)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169787605), received between Dec 17, 2019 and Jul 9, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • Abdominal Pain1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 9, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING THE STENT PXB35-05-27-135 VISI PRO 035 AND STENT PXB35-05-37-135 VISI PRO 035, THE FIRST STENT DETACHED FROM THE BALLOON AT THE TARGET LESION AND WAS SUBSEQUENTLY PULLED BACK AND DEPLOYED IN THE BRACHIAL ARTERY, WHICH WAS NOT THE INTENDED TARGET SITE. A SECOND STENT WAS THEN USED, BUT IT ALSO DETACHED FROM THE BALLOON IN THE AORTA JUST OUTSIDE OF THE SHEATH, WAS CAPTURED, PULLED BACK, AND DEPLOYED IN THE BRACHIAL ARTERY, AGAIN NOT AT THE INTENDED TARGET SITE. THERE WAS NO INJURY/INTERVENTION ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS THEN ABORTED. MODERATE RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE FIRST DEVICE, BUT NO EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS USED. BOTH STENTS REMAINED IMPLANTED IN THE BRACHIAL ARTERY. THE TARGET VESSEL WAS THE RENAL ARTERY/BRACHIAL ARTERY WITH A DIAMETER OF 5MM AND A COOK 6F SHEATH WAS USED. NO EMBOLIC PROTECTION, PRE-DILATION, OR POST-DILATION WAS PERFORMED. THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE WERE FOLLOWED WITHOUT ISSUE. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED, AND THE PATIENT WAS ALIVE WITH NO INJURY. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22459459 ↗
  • InjuryDec 17, 2019Fracture; Fracture

    VISIPRO STENT WAS IMPLANTED IN THE SUPERIOR MESENTERIC ARTERY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT FRACTURE OCCURRED A FEW MONTHS AFTER DEPLOYMENT. PATIENT COMPLAINED OF ABDOMINAL PAIN AND WAS RE-IMAGED TO FIND THE ORIGINAL STENT IN TWO PIECES. NO FURTHER PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED FOR THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Abdominal Pain

    MAUDE report 9480456 ↗

Other STENT, ILIAC devices

All STENT, ILIAC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page