SilverHawk™ P4056Recalls & reported problems
Covidien LP · ATHERECTOMY P4056 MS-M SILVERHAWK ATK UN · Class 2
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00643169968448), received between Sep 26, 2018 and Sep 26, 2018 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Jam” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Mechanical Jam1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 26, 2018Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Jam
THE PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING TO USE A SILVERHAWK ATK WITH A PROTÉGÉ EF AS PER THE IFU TO TREAT A FIBROUS LESION WITH A SMALL DEGREE OF CALCIFICATION AND WITH 80% STENOSIS IN THE MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. NO ABNORMALITIES WERE REPORTED IN RELATION TO THE PATIENTS ANATOMY. THE LESION HAD A LENGTH OF 200MM AND THE ARTERY HAD A DIAMETER OF 5MM. THE PROCEDURE USED A NON MEDTRONIC 7FR SHEATH AND AN EV3 NITREX 0.014 300CM GUIDEWIRE. THE LESION WAS PREDILATED WITH A 5 X 150MM DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED WITH NO ISSUED IDENTIFIED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. NO RESISTANCE WAS REPORTED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE NOR WAS EXCESSIVE FORCE USED. IT WAS REPORTED THE PACKING MECHANISM OF THE SILVERHAWK JAMMED AND WOULD NOT CLOSE. THE BLADE RETURNED INTO THE HOUSING BEFORE IT WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT A 7 X 120 EVERFLEX STENT WAS ADVANCED OVER THE WIRE TO THE TARGET LESION. THE MD DETERMINED THE STENT HE REQUESTED WAS TOO LONG AND WAS HE NOT COMFORTABLE DEPLOYING THIS STENT. HE SUBSEQUENTLY REMOVED THE UNDEPLOYED 7 X120 STENT AND REPLACED IT WITH A 7 X100 EVERFLEX STENT. AFTER SEEING THE 7 X 100 STENT UNDE
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7909169 ↗
Other Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy devices
- HawkOne™ H1-MCovidien LP · Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy1 recall367 reports
- JETSTREAM™ XC 112266-001Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy288 reports
- JETSTREAM™ XC 112264-001Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy262 reports
- SET Rotarex®S 6F 135cm (Straub Medical®) Version 1.0Straub Medical AG · Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy2 deaths206 reports
- SET Rotarex™S 6 F x 135 cm 80237Straub Medical AG · Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy1 recall79 reports
- HawkOne™ H1-SCovidien LP · Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy1 recall70 reports
- Turbo-Elite Laser Atherectomy Catheter 420-006Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy2 recalls19 reports
- Turbo-Elite Laser Atherectomy Catheter 417-152Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy2 recalls16 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.