EverCross™ AB35W06040040Recalls & reported problems
Ev3, Inc · PTA AB35W06040040 EVERCROSS 035 V08 · Class 2
All models of EverCross (114)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00643169973855), received between Feb 17, 2020 and Feb 17, 2020 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Burst Container or Vessel1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 17, 2020Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel
PHYSICIAN INTENDED TO USE AN EVERCROSS PTA BALLOON WITH A 6FR NON-MEDTRONIC (TERUMO) SHEATH AND NON-MEDTRONIC (BENTSON) GUIDEWIRE DU RING TREATMENT OF A 5MM PLAQUE LESION IN THE PATIENT¿S MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) OF DIAMETER 6MM. MODERATE VESSEL CALCIFICATION AND TORTUOSITY ARE REPORTED. LESION EXHIBITED 75% STENOSIS. NO DAMAGE NOTED TO THE PACKAGING PRIOR TO USE. NO ISSUES NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE PACKAGING. IFU WAS FOLLOWED AND THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED WITHOUT ISSUE. THE DEVICE WAS NOT PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT AND NO RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED DURING ADVANCEMENT. A NON-MEDTRONIC (PRESTO) INFLATION DEVICE WAS USED WITH HEPARINIZED SALINE AND VISIPAQUE FOR BALLOON INFLATION. IT IS REPORTED A BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED AT 10ATM DURING THE FIRST INFLATION. ALL COMPONENTS OF THE DEVICE WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT ISSUE. NO INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9716397 ↗
Other Catheter, percutaneous devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page