VENTURE™ Anterior Cervical Plate System 9790315Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · SCREW 9790315 4 0X15 SELF TAP VAR · Class 2 · Implant
All models of VENTURE Anterior Cervical Plate System (9)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00721902989704), received between Apr 21, 2020 and Sep 15, 2020 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
- Nonstandard Device2
Patient problems
- Neurological Deficit/Dysfunction4
- Hyporesponsive to stimuli2
- Movement Disorder2
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 15, 2020Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A CONSUMER VIA FIELD REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WHO UNDERGONE SPINAL THERAPY WITH A PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS OF CERVICAL FRACTURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY, THE PATIENT DEVELOPED NEUROLOGIC SYMPTOMS AND UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY THE NEXT DAY TO REMOVE THE FOUR SCREWS OF THE FIRST SURGERY. THE PRODUCTS HAVE BEEN IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT, AND THE LARGER DIAMETER SCREWS HAVE BEEN USED DURING THE SECONDARY REVISION SURGERY. THE SIZE OF THE SCREW IMPLANTS THAT WERE IMPLANTED DURING THE REVISION SURGERY WAS WITH DIAMETER OF 4.5. THE SECOND REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY, AND THESE SCREWS CAN NO LONGER BE USED. THERE WAS NO DEVICE BREAKAGE AND PRODUCT UTILIZED CORRECTLY ACCORDING TO THE DIRECTIONS GIVEN IN THE IFU/LABELING. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Movement Disorder; Neurological Deficit/Dysfunction
MAUDE report 10533400 ↗InjurySep 15, 2020Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A CONSUMER VIA FIELD REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WHO UNDERGONE SPINAL THERAPY WITH A PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS OF CERVICAL FRACTURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY, THE PATIENT DEVELOPED NEUROLOGIC SYMPTOMS AND UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY THE NEXT DAY TO REMOVE THE FOUR SCREWS OF THE FIRST SURGERY. THE PRODUCTS HAVE BEEN IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT, AND THE LARGER DIAMETER SCREWS HAVE BEEN USED DURING THE SECONDARY REVISION SURGERY. THE SIZE OF THE SCREW IMPLANTS THAT WERE IMPLANTED DURING THE REVISION SURGERY WAS WITH DIAMETER OF 4.5. THE SECOND REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY, AND THESE SCREWS CAN NO LONGER BE USED. THERE WAS NO DEVICE BREAKAGE AND PRODUCT UTILIZED CORRECTLY ACCORDING TO THE DIRECTIONS GIVEN IN THE IFU/LABELING. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Movement Disorder; Neurological Deficit/Dysfunction
MAUDE report 10533389 ↗InjuryApr 21, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
PRE OP DIAGNOSIS: SPINAL CORD INJURY PROCEDURE PERFORMED: ANTERIOR 4 CERVICAL SUBTOTAL VERTEBRAL BODY SUBTOTAL RESECTION, CERVICAL 3-4, 4-5 DISCECTOMY, SPINAL CANAL AND SPINAL NERVE DECOMPRESSION, BONE GRAFT FUSION AND INTERNAL FIXATION POST OP, THE SCREW LOOSEN AND STEEL PLATE MIGRATED. THE PATIENT DEVELOPED NEW NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS, AND THE PATIENT'S LOWER LIMB DE CREASED SENSATION. AS A RESULT OF THIS REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED. IN REVISION SURGERY THEY REMOVED THE ORIGINAL STEEL PLATE, RE-EXPANDED THE DECOMPRESSION RANGE, AND REPLACED WITH A LONGER STEEL PLATE.
Patient problems: Hyporesponsive to stimuli; Neurological Deficit/Dysfunction
MAUDE report 9980444 ↗InjuryApr 21, 2020Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
PRE OP DIAGNOSIS: SPINAL CORD INJURY PROCEDURE PERFORMED: ANTERIOR 4 CERVICAL SUBTOTAL VERTEBRAL BODY SUBTOTAL RESECTION, CERVICAL 3-4, 4-5 DISCECTOMY, SPINAL CANAL AND SPINAL NERVE DECOMPRESSION, BONE GRAFT FUSION AND INTERNAL FIXATION POST OP, THE SCREW LOOSEN AND STEEL PLATE MIGRATED. THE PATIENT DEVELOPED NEW NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS, AND THE PATIENT'S LOWER LIMB DE CREASED SENSATION. AS A RESULT OF THIS REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED. IN REVISION SURGERY THEY REMOVED THE ORIGINAL STEEL PLATE, RE-EXPANDED THE DECOMPRESSION RANGE, AND REPLACED WITH A LONGER STEEL PLATE.
Patient problems: Hyporesponsive to stimuli; Neurological Deficit/Dysfunction
MAUDE report 9980441 ↗
Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY devices
- CD HORIZON® SOLERA® VOYAGER™ Spinal System 6550017Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Appliance, fixation, spinal intervertebral body131 reports
- EVEREST® Spinal System 2901-10001VB Spine LLC · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY119 reports
- ZEVO™ Anterior Cervical Plate System 7710015Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY1 recall1 report
- XLP 7565050Nuvasive, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY1 recall0 reports
- Elegance® Anterior Cervical Plate 53430344Clariance · Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Intervertebral Body1 recall0 reports
- ATLANTIS® Anterior Cervical Plate System 876-170Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY1 recall0 reports
- XLP 7565060Nuvasive, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY1 recall0 reports
- Elegance® Anterior Cervical Plate 53430113Clariance · Appliance, Fixation, Spinal Intervertebral Body1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page