GORE EXCLUDER AAA Endoprosthesis PXC201000Recalls & reported problems
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · Contralateral Leg · Class 3 · Implant
All models of GORE EXCLUDER AAA Endoprosthesis (81)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Gore Excluder AAA endoprosthesis contralateral leg is an endovascular graft component used to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms. The 24 reports mostly describe aneurysms enlarging and leaks around the graft, sometimes involving obstruction, migration, or the component becoming displaced. They include 24 injuries and no deaths; no recalls name this device, and reports fell from 7 to 2 in the latest 12 months.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 24
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 24
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 24 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00733132610037), received between Jul 6, 2018 and Apr 1, 2026 — classified as 24 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient-Device Incompatibility” (4 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P020004); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem15
- Patient-Device Incompatibility4
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
- Migration2
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Device Endoleak1
Patient problems
- Aneurysm10
- Clinical Endoleak7
- Aneurysm expansion6
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available3
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- Obstruction/Occlusion2
- Embolism/Embolus1
Recent adverse event reports
The 24 most recent of 24 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 1, 2026Patient-Device Incompatibility
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2010, A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURE TO TREAT AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM USING GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS DEVICES. TWO CONTRALATERAL LEG COMPONENTS (BOTH PXC181000) WERE IMPLANTED BILATERALLY, AND A CONTRALATERAL COMPONENT (PXC201000) WAS ADDED TO EXTEND THE RIGHT LEG. THE SPECIFIC DEVICE SERIAL NUMBER IMPLANTED AT END OF THE LEFT LEG COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, TYPE IB ENDOLEAKS WERE OBSERVED IN BOTH LEGS. ON (B)(6) 2026, A REINTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED. REPORTEDLY, AT THE TIME OF THE REINTERVENTION, THE RIGHT INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY WAS FOUND TO BE OCCLUDED. THE LEFT INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY WAS COIL EMBOLIZED. BOTH LEGS WERE EXTENDED WITH GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS DEVICES INTO THE EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERIES. THE ENDOLEAKS WERE RESOLVED, AND THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Clinical Endoleak
MAUDE report 24760679 ↗InjuryJan 7, 2026Device Endoleak
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2009, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM USING A GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS (TRUNK-IPSILATERAL LEG) AND A GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS (CONTRALATERAL LEG COMPONENT). ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT REQUIRED ENDOVASCULAR REINTERVENTION TO ADDRESS BOTH A TYPE 1A AND TYPE 1B ENDOLEAK CONTRIBUTING TO ANEURYSM ENLARGEMENT, WITH THE ANEURYSM SAC MEASURING 10CM AT THE TIME OF REINTERVENTION. THE PROCEDURE INCLUDED EMBOLIZATION OF THE LEFT INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY, THEN DISTAL EXTENSION OF THE LEFT LIMB WITH A GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS (CONTRALATERAL LEG COMPONENT) INTO THE LEFT EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY IN ORDER TO TREAT THE TYPE 1B ENDOLEAK, AND PLACEMENT OF ENDO ANCHORS AT THE PROXIMAL END OF THE TRUNK TO RESOLVE THE TYPE 1A ENDOLEAK. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ENDOLEAKS WERE ATTRIBUTED TO DEGENERATION OF THE ARTERIES DISTAL TO THE PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED GRAFTS. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: Aneurysm expansion; Clinical Endoleak; Obstruction/Occlusion
MAUDE report 23991809 ↗InjuryOct 24, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO GORE THAT ON (B)(6) 2011, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT FOR AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM USING GORE EXCLUDER AAA ENDOPROSTHESES. A TOTAL OF FOUR COMPONENTS WERE DEPLOYED: ONE TRUNK IPSILATERAL LEG AND THREE CONTRALATERAL LEGS. ON (B)(6) 2025, A REINTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED AS BOTH COMMON ILIAC ARTERIES HAD BECOME ANEURYSMAL. A TOTAL OF SEVEN NEW COMPONENTS WERE PLACED: ONE CONTRALATERAL LEG, TWO ILIAC BRANCH COMPONENTS, TWO INTERNAL ILIAC COMPONENTS, AND TWO VBX. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL.
Patient problems: Aneurysm expansion
MAUDE report 23376900 ↗InjuryOct 24, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO GORE THAT ON (B)(6) 2011, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT FOR AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM USING GORE EXCLUDER AAA ENDOPROSTHESES. A TOTAL OF FOUR COMPONENTS WERE DEPLOYED: ONE TRUNK IPSILATERAL LEG AND THREE CONTRALATERAL LEGS. ON (B)(6) 2025, A REINTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED AS BOTH COMMON ILIAC ARTERIES HAD BECOME ANEURYSMAL. A TOTAL OF SEVEN NEW COMPONENTS WERE PLACED: ONE CONTRALATERAL LEG, TWO ILIAC BRANCH COMPONENTS, TWO INTERNAL ILIAC COMPONENTS, AND TWO VBX. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL.
Patient problems: Aneurysm expansion
MAUDE report 23376897 ↗InjuryOct 22, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2012, THIS PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR FOR AN INFRARENAL AORTIC ANEURYSM, TREATED WITH GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT FOLLOW UP IMAGES (MODALITY AND DATE IS UNKNOWN) REVEALED A DISTAL TYPE I ENDOLEAK ON THE (PXC201000/9641391 DEVICE). THE ANEURYSM HAD LOST SEAL IN THE ILIAC ARTERY AND THERE WAS ANEURYSM ENLARGEMENT (AMOUNT IS UNKNOWN). THE ROOT CAUSE FOR THE ENDOLEAK IS UNKNOWN. THE PHYSICIAN REINTERVENED ON (B)(6) 2025, AND IMPLANTED A GORE® EXCLUDER® ILIAC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS. THE ENDOLEAK WAS RESOLVED AND THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Clinical Endoleak
MAUDE report 23357347 ↗InjuryAug 5, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2010, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT FOR AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM USING GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS DEVICES. AT AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY, AT THE SITE WHERE THE DISTAL END OF A CONTRALATERAL LEG ENDOPROSTHESIS HAD BEEN IMPLANTED, WAS FOUND TO BE DILATED. ON (B)(6) 2025, A REINTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED. THE LEFT INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY WAS EMBOLIZED, AND A GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS (CONTRALATERAL LEG ENDOPROSTHESIS) WAS IMPLANTED TO EXTEND THE INITIALLY IMPLANTED CONTRALATERAL LEG ENDOPROSTHESIS TO THE LEFT EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY. THE PROCEDURE WAS WELL TOLERATED BY THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN STATED THAT THE INITIALLY IMPLANTED CONTRALATERAL LEG ENDOPROSTHESIS WAS UNDERSIZED BECAUSE THE DIAMETER OF THE LARGEST COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE DEVICE AT THAT TIME WAS 20 MM.
Patient problems: Aneurysm
MAUDE report 22713037 ↗InjuryApr 25, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2007, THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESES TO TREAT AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM.
Patient problems: Aneurysm
MAUDE report 21913025 ↗InjuryFeb 5, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2008, THIS PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT FOR AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM USING GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESES. 1X TRUNK IPSILATERAL LEG AND TOTAL 4X CONTRALATERAL LEGS WERE IMPLANTED, EXTENDING TO BOTH COMMON ILIAC ARTERIES. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, EXPANSION OF BOTH COMMON ILIAC ARTERIES WAS OBSERVED. ON (B)(6) 2025, A REINTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED. BOTH INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERIES WERE COIL-EMBOLIZED, AND ADDITIONAL STENT GRAFTS WERE PLACED IN EACH EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERIES. FURTHERMORE, A BIRD-BEAK WAS OBSERVED AT THE PROXIMAL END OF THE TRUNK IPSILATERAL LEG. ALTHOUGH NO ENDOLEAK WAS OBSERVED, AN ADDITIONAL STENT GRAFT WAS PLACED PROXIMALLY AS A PREVENTIVE MEASURE. THE PHYSICIAN¿S COMMENT: ¿AS WE DO NOT HAVE SURGICAL RECORDS, IT IS UNCLEAR WHETHER THE INITIAL PLACEMENT OF STENT GRAFTS WAS SUBOPTIMAL OR IF THERE WAS AN ERROR IN SIZE SELECTION. ALTHOUGH MORE THAN 16 YEARS HAD PASSED SINCE THE INITIAL PLACEMENT, NO DAMAGE OR DETERIORATION OF THE DEVICE WAS OBSERVED.¿
Patient problems: Aneurysm expansion
MAUDE report 21315775 ↗InjuryNov 5, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2012, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM USING GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESES. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE RIGHT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY ANEURYSM ENLARGEMENT WAS OBSERVED. ON (B)(6) 2024, CONSIDERING A RISK OF OCCURRENCE OF TYPE IB ENDOLEAK, A REINTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED. GORE® EXCLUDER® ILIAC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESES WERE IMPLANTED IN THE RIGHT ILIAC ARTERY. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Aneurysm expansion; Clinical Endoleak
MAUDE report 20607896 ↗InjuryJul 8, 2024Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility
THE FSA REPORTED THE FOLLOWING TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2009, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURE UTILIZING THE GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESES (2 CONTRALATERAL LEGS, 1 AORTIC EXTENDER, AND 1 TRUNK-IPSILATERAL LEG). ON (B)(6) 2024, DURING A FOLLOW UP CT SCAN, THE PHYSICIAN CONTACTED THE FSA AND REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD BILATERAL TYPE 1B ENDOLEAKS. THEY PLAN TO IMPLANT ONE IBE MOST LIKELY ON THE LEFT LIMB AND THEN POSSIBLY ONE ON THE RIGHT AS WELL IN A FEW WEEKS.
Patient problems: Clinical Endoleak
MAUDE report 19688503 ↗InjuryJul 8, 2024Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility
THE FSA REPORTED THE FOLLOWING TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2009, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURE UTILIZING THE GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESES (2 CONTRALATERAL LEGS, 1 AORTIC EXTENDER, AND 1 TRUNK-IPSILATERAL LEG). ON (B)(6) 2024, DURING A FOLLOW UP CT SCAN, THE PHYSICIAN CONTACTED THE FSA AND REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD BILATERAL TYPE 1B ENDOLEAKS. THEY PLAN TO IMPLANT ONE IBE MOST LIKELY ON THE LEFT LIMB AND THEN POSSIBLY ONE ON THE RIGHT AS WELL IN A FEW WEEKS.
Patient problems: Clinical Endoleak
MAUDE report 19688498 ↗InjuryMar 5, 2024Migration; Migration
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2010, THIS PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT FOR AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM USING GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS (EXCLUDER). ON UNKNOWN DATE, WHEN A CT EXAM WAS PERFORMED, THE DISTAL END OF AN EXCLUDER DEVICE THAT HAD BEEN IMPLANTED TO THE LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY WAS FOUND TO HAVE MIGRATED PROXIMALLY (>10MM). THE DISTAL SEALING LENGTH OF THE DEVICE HAD BEEN SHORTENED, THEREFORE, A REINTERVENTION WAS PLANNED FOR TREATMENT. ON (B)(6) 2024, A REINTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED. THE LEFT INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY WAS COIL-EMBOLIZED, AND TWO ADDITIONAL STENT GRAFTS WERE ADDED TO THE DISTAL END OF PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED DEVICE TOWARDS THE LEFT EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 18843138 ↗InjuryNov 6, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6)2013, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM USING GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESES. A LEFT LEG DEVICE WAS IMPLANTED TO THE LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, (B)(6) 2023, A COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY REVEALED AN ENLARGED ANEURYSM DIAMETER AND OCCLUSION OF THE LEFT EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY. ON (B)(6) 2023, A REINTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED FOR THE ENDOLEAK. A DILATION OF THE LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY WAS OBSERVED. TWO GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS WITH HEPARIN BIOACTIVE SURFACE DEVICES WERE ADDITIONALLY IMPLANTED FROM THE BIFURCATION TO THE LEFT INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY. THE LEFT EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY REMAINED OCCLUDED, BUT NO FURTHER TREATMENT WAS GIVEN. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE. THE PHYSICIAN REPORTEDLY STATED THAT THE ENLARGED ANEURYSM DIAMETER WAS CAUSED BY THE DISTAL TYPE I ENDOLEAK. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT KNOW WHAT CAUSED THE OCCLUSION.
Patient problems: Clinical Endoleak; Embolism/Embolus; Obstruction/Occlusion
MAUDE report 18080176 ↗InjuryOct 4, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Migration; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2012, A PATIENT PRESENTING WITH AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM WAS TREATED WITH A GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS. ON (B)(6) 2020, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH EXPANSION OF THE LEFT-SIDED ILIAC ANEURYSM DUE TO DISTAL MIGRATION OF THE TRUNK IPSILATERAL LEG. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH COIL EMBOLIZATION OF LEFT ILIAC INTERNAL BRANCHES AND IMPLANTATION OF A STENT GRAFT.
Patient problems: Aneurysm; Aneurysm expansion
MAUDE report 17869038 ↗InjuryMay 11, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
ON (B)(6) 2012, A PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM USING GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESES. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, ENLARGEMENT OF THE ANEURYSM AND BILATERAL COMMON ILIAC ARTERIES WAS OBSERVED, AND DISTAL TYPE I ENDOLEAK ON BOTH SIDES WAS SUSPECTED. ON (B)(6) 2022, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE WHEREBY ALL COMPONENTS WERE REMOVED, AND THE VASCULATURE WAS SURGICALLY REPAIRED. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL EVENT INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NONE WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Aneurysm; Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 14359198 ↗InjuryMay 9, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
ON (B)(6) 2011, A PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM USING A NON-GORE MANUFACTURED STENT GRAFT AS A MAIN BODY, AND A GORE® EXCLUDER® CONTRALATERAL LEG COMPONENT IMPLANTED DISTALLY ON EACH SIDE. ON UNKNOWN DATE, A FOLLOW-UP EXAMINATION REPORTEDLY REVEALED BILATERAL DISTAL TYPE I ENDOLEAKS. ADDITIONAL EVENT INFORMATION, INCLUDING THE CAUSE OF THE ENDOLEAKS, WAS REQUESTED BUT NOT AVAILABLE. ON (B)(6) 2022, A REINTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT BOTH TYPE I ENDOLEAKS. THE RIGHT INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY WAS COIL EMBOLIZED, AND AN ADDITIONAL GORE® EXCLUDER® COMPONENT WAS IMPLANTED TO EXTEND THE STENT GRAFT SYSTEM DISTALLY ON THE RIGHT SIDE. AN INTRA-OPERATIVE ANGIOGRAPH AT THE LEFT LEG REVEALED NO DISTAL TYPE I ENDOLEAK, BUT THE PHYSICIAN REPORTEDLY ELECTED TO IMPLANT AN ADDITIONAL GORE® EXCLUDER® ILIAC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS ON THE LEFT SIDE. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 14340246 ↗InjuryAug 11, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2013, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM USING GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, A DISTAL TYPE I ENDOLEAK WAS SUSPECTED DUE TO RIGHT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY ENLARGEMENT DURING THE FOLLOW UP EXAM. ON (B)(6) 2021, A REINTERVENTION TOOK PLACE. AN ADDITIONAL STENT GRAFT WAS DEPLOYED AFTER THE RIGHT INTERNAL ILIAC WAS INTENTIONALLY OCCLUDED. THE STENT GRAFT WAS PLACED AT THE RIGHT EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Aneurysm
MAUDE report 12307752 ↗InjuryMar 25, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2012, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM USING GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESES. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE , AT A FOLLOW UP EXAMINATION, ANEURYSM ENLARGEMENT WAS DETECTED IN THE BILATERAL COMMON ILIAC ARTERIES. ON (B)(6) 2021, REINTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED. THE RIGHT INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY WAS COIL EMBOLIZED AND STENT GRAFTS WERE IMPLANTED BOTH INTO THE RIGHT EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY AND LEFT EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY. IT WAS REPORTED THE BOTH COMMON ILIAC ARTERIES HAD TENDENCY OF ANEURYSMS AT THE INDEX PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Aneurysm
MAUDE report 11569851 ↗InjuryMar 4, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2009, THIS PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM USING GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESES. ON (B)(6) 2020, FILMS WERE READ BY THE GORE FIELD SALES ASSOCIATE THAT REVEALED THE CONTRALATERAL LEG COMPONENT IN THE RIGHT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY HAD NO DEVICE APPOSITION TO THE VESSEL WALL. ON (B)(6) 2020, A REINTERVENTION OCCURRED WHEREBY ADDITIONAL COMPONENTS WERE IMPLANTED TO TREAT THE LACK OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL DEVICE APPOSITION.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9788679 ↗InjuryMar 4, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2009, THIS PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM USING GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESES. ON (B)(6) 2020, FILMS WERE READ BY THE GORE FIELD SALES ASSOCIATE THAT REVEALED THE CONTRALATERAL LEG COMPONENT IN THE LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY WAS NOW "FLOATING IN THE ANEURYSM SAC. ON (B)(6) 2020, A REINTERVENTION OCCURRED WHEREBY ADDITIONAL COMPONENTS WERE IMPLANTED TO TREAT THE LACK OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL DEVICE APPOSITION.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9788676 ↗InjuryMay 15, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2005, THIS PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT FOR AN INFRARENAL ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM AND WAS IMPLANTED WITH GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESES. ON (B)(6) 2019, FOLLOW-UP COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY (CTA) INDICATED APPROXIMATELY 3CM GROWTH OF THE LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY (LCIA) DISTAL TO THE IMPLANTED DEVICE IN THE LCIA ON THE CONTRALATERAL SIDE. SEAL WAS STILL EVIDENT IN THE PROXIMAL LCIA. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REINTERVENTION AND THE LEFT INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY WAS COILED AND TWO ADDITIONAL GORE® CONTRALATERAL LEG COMPONENTS WERE IMPLANTED TO BRIDGE AND EXTEND COVERAGE FROM THE LEVEL OF THE FLOW DIVIDER DOWN TO THE LEFT EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WITH NO REPORTED ISSUES AND IS DOING WELL.
Patient problems: Aneurysm
MAUDE report 8613364 ↗InjuryApr 25, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2012, THIS PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT FOR AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC AND RIGHT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY ANEURYSMS AND WAS IMPLANTED WITH A GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS. THE PATIENT'S RIGHT INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY WAS REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN INTENTIONALLY COVERED BY THE DEVICE, FOLLOWED BY COIL EMBOLIZATION. THE PATIENT'S LEFT SIDE WAS REPORTED TO BE "SHAGGY" BUT NOT ANEURYSMAL. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE. ON (B)(6) 2019, FOLLOW-UP COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) SHOWED ANEURYSMAL DISEASE PROGRESSION WITHIN THE LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. NO ENDOLEAK OR LOSS OF DISTAL APPOSITION WAS REPORTED. ON (B)(6) 2019, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT RE-INTERVENTION WHEREIN THE LEFT SIDE WAS TREATED ENDOVASCULARLY AND GORE® EXCLUDER® ILIAC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS WERE IMPLANTED TO EXTEND COVERAGE OF THE LEFT SIDE DISTALLY. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Aneurysm
MAUDE report 8550422 ↗InjuryApr 5, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2012 A PATIENT UNDERWENT TREATMENT OF A THORACOABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM MEASURING 57MM WITH GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESES. ON (B)(6) 2019 A CT SHOWED THE ANEURYSM MEASURED 95MM. ON (B)(6) 2019 A RUPTURE OF THE ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM WAS RECOGNIZED AND A CONVERSION TO OPEN REPAIR WAS PERFORMED. TYPE II AND III ENDOLEAKS WERE REPORTED. THE TYPE II ENDOLEAK FROM A LUMBAR ARTERY WAS ADDRESSED BY SUTURE CLOSURE USING A DOUBLE NEEDLE 3-0 PROLENE SUTURE, 2.2. THE TYPE III ENDOLEAK WAS ADDRESSED WITH TWO CONTRALATERAL LEG COMPONENTS. ON (B)(6) 2019 THE PATIENT EXPIRED. THE CAUSE OF DEATH WAS REPORTED AS CARDIAC ARREST, DUE TO A CARDIAC COMPLICATION FOLLOWING ANGIOPLASTY.
Patient problems: Aneurysm
MAUDE report 8489649 ↗InjuryJul 6, 2018Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility
ON (B)(6) 2011, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM AND BILATERAL COMMON ILIAC ARTERY ANEURYSMS WITH A SYSTEM OF GORE EXCLUDER AAA ENDOPROSTHESES. ACCORDING TO THE REPORT, THE RIGHT INTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY WAS COIL-EMBOLIZED, AND INTENTIONALLY COVERED BY THE IPSILATERAL LIMB OF THE TRUNK-IPSILATERAL LEG COMPONENT. THE PROCEDURE CONCLUDED WITH THE IMPLANTATION OF TWO CONTRALATERAL LEG COMPONENTS (PXC141000 AND PXC201000- MOST DISTAL) ON THE PATIENT¿S LEFT SIDE. ACCORDING TO THE REPORT, THE CONTRALATERAL LEG COMPONENT (PXC201000) WAS UNDERSIZED FOR PLACEMENT WITHIN THE PATIENT¿S 22.2 MM LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY, HOWEVER AT THE TIME OF THE INITIAL IMPLANT PROCEDURE, A LARGER DEVICE WAS REPORTEDLY NOT AVAILABLE. INTRA-PROCEDURAL ANGIOGRAPHY WAS PERFORMED, A DISTAL TYPE I ENDOLEAK WAS OBSERVED ORIGINATING FROM THE MOST DISTAL CONTRALATERAL LEG COMPONENT (PXC201000). AS IT WAS DETERMINED, THE ENDOLEAK WAS NOT COMMUNICATING WITH THE ANEURYSMAL SAC, THE PHYSICIAN ELECTED NOT TO PERFORM AN ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE TO TREAT THE ENDOLEAK. FINAL ANGIOGRAPHY, SHOWED EXCLUSION OF ALL ANEURYSMS AND THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE. ACCORD
Patient problems: Aneurysm
MAUDE report 7666500 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P020004. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0995-2020 · Jan 6, 2020 · TerminatedGORE EXCLUDER AAA Endoprosthesis
- Z-0996-2020 · Jan 6, 2020 · TerminatedGORE EXCLUDER Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE)
Other System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment devices
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2814C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls34 deaths254 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF3214C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls19 deaths173 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF3614C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT1 recall37 deaths214 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2514C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls18 deaths136 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2314C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls9 deaths60 reports
- RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Graft System 28-N4-34-154-34UBolton Medical Inc. · System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment3 recalls7 reports
- Vela Proximal Endograft System A34-34/C100-O20 VEndologix LLC · System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment3 deaths152 reports
- Endurant® II ETCF2828C49EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls7 deaths44 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page