GORE EXCLUDER AAA Endoprosthesis with C3 Delivery RLT281212Recalls & reported problems
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · EXCLUDER AAA ENDO TRNK IPSI 28.5mmX12mmX12cm 18Fr · Class 3 · Implant
All models of GORE EXCLUDER AAA Endoprosthesis with C3 Delivery (51)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00733132622481), received between Aug 27, 2018 and Mar 5, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient-Device Incompatibility” (2 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P020004); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Patient-Device Incompatibility2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Device Endoleak1
- Difficult or Delayed Activation1
- Migration1
Patient problems
- Clinical Endoleak3
- Aneurysm expansion2
- No Code Available1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 5, 2025Migration; Device Endoleak; Migration; Device Endoleak
IT WAS REPORTED TO GORE THAT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE IN (B)(6) 2022 THIS PATIENT UNDERWENT A PROCEDURE TO TREAT AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM AND WAS IMPLANTED WITH GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESES AND GORE® EXCLUDER® ILIAC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESES. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, FOLLOW-UP IMAGING REPORTEDLY SHOWED DISTAL MIGRATION OF THE IPSILATERAL TRUNK RESULTING IN AN ENDOLEAK AND SAC ENLARGEMENT. THE EXACT ANEURYSM SAC GROWTH IS UNKNOWN. THE PHYSICIAN REPORTEDLY BELIEVES THAT THE REASON FOR THE MIGRATION IS LIKELY DISEASE PROGRESSION. THE PHYSICIAN HAS PLANNED A REINTERVENTION FOR DEVICE EXPLANT. THERE IS NO EXPLANT DATE AS OF YET.
Patient problems: Aneurysm expansion; Clinical Endoleak
MAUDE report 21523710 ↗InjuryApr 19, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE FIELD SALES ASSOCIATE (FSA) REPORTED THE FOLLOWING: ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH A GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESES TO TREAT AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT HAD A REINTERVENTION TO TREAT A PROXIMAL TYPE I ENDOLEAK. REPORTEDLY THE PATIENT HAS A CALCIFIED AORTA, AND THIS WAS CAUSING THE ENDOLEAK. THE PHYSICIAN USED THIRTEEN ENDOANCHORS, THE ENDOLEAK WAS RESOLVED. THERE WAS NO ANEURYSM SAC ENLARGEMENT. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE REINTERVENTION.
Patient problems: Clinical Endoleak
MAUDE report 19149022 ↗InjuryMay 23, 2023Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2016, A PATIENT PRESENTING WITH AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM WAS TREATED WITH A GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESIS. FOLLOWING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE, A MAXIMUM AORTIC DIAMETER OF 55 MM WAS MEASURED USING ULTRASOUND. THE MAXIMUM AORTIC DIAMETER INCREASED TO TO 62 MM AS MEASURED USING ULTRASOUND ON (B)(6) 2021. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A TYPE IA ENDOLEAK AND WAS TREATED WITH THE IMPLANTATION OF AN ADDITIONAL DEVICE TO EXTEND THE ENDOPROSTHESIS PROXIMALLY.
Patient problems: Aneurysm expansion; Clinical Endoleak
MAUDE report 16984645 ↗MalfunctionAug 30, 2018Difficult or Delayed Activation; Difficult or Delayed Activation
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2018, THIS PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT FOR AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM AND WAS TREATED WITH GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESES. THE CONTRAGATE DID NOT OPEN FULLY DURING FIRST STAGE DEPLOYMENT OF A GORE® EXCLUDER® TRUNK-IPSILATERAL LEG COMPONENT RLT281212. AFTER A TIME INTENSIVE PROCESS OF CANNULATING THE CONTRAGATE DUE TO THE REDUCTION IN DIAMETER, THE CLINICIAN ADVANCED A 12 FRENCH GORE® DRY SEAL FLEX INTRODUCER SHEATH, TO WHICH THE CONTRAGATE VISIBLY 'POPPED' OPEN. REPORTEDLY, ALL PROCEDURAL STEPS WERE FOLLOWED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE AND THE 18FR GORE® DRY SEAL FLEX INTRODUCER SHEATH WAS RETRACTED APPROXIMATELY 25/30MM DISTALLY FROM THE CONTRAGATE MARKER ON FIRST STAGE DEPLOYMENT. THE REASON FOR THE INITIALLY INHIBITED FULL DEPLOYMENT OF THE CONTRAGATE WAS REPORTEDLY UNKNOWN AND THERE WAS NO CALCIFICATION OR TORTUOUS ANATOMY THAT WAS THOUGHT TO HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THIS INCIDENT. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7831748 ↗InjuryAug 27, 2018Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2018, THIS PATIENT UNDERWENT EMERGENCY ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT FOR A RUPTURED ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM AND WAS TREATED WITH GORE® EXCLUDER® AAA ENDOPROSTHESES. ON (B)(6) 2018, FOLLOW-UP COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING IDENTIFIED A TYPE 1A ENDOLEAK RESULTING FROM THE PATIENT¿S AORTIC NECK LENGTH WITH 10 MM ONLY AND THEREFORE CONSIDERED OUTSIDE OF THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE. ON (B)(6) 2018, A RE-INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED AND IT WAS UNSUCCESSFULLY ATTEMPTED TO REPAIR THE ENDOLEAK BY USING APTUS® STAPLES. THE SITUATION WAS SUBSEQUENTLY SOLVED BY INJECTING THROMBIN INTO THE ANEURYSM SAC. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 7815764 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P020004. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0995-2020 · Jan 6, 2020 · TerminatedGORE EXCLUDER AAA Endoprosthesis
- Z-0996-2020 · Jan 6, 2020 · TerminatedGORE EXCLUDER Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE)
Other System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment devices
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2814C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls34 deaths254 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF3214C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls19 deaths173 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF3614C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT1 recall37 deaths214 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2514C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls18 deaths136 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2314C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls9 deaths60 reports
- RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Graft System 28-N4-34-154-34UBolton Medical Inc. · System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment3 recalls7 reports
- Vela Proximal Endograft System A34-34/C100-O20 VEndologix LLC · System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment3 deaths152 reports
- Endurant® II ETCF2828C49EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls7 deaths44 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page