Skip to content

GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis VBCR050502ARecalls & reported problems

W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · VIABAHN SX ENDO 35 RO 5mmX5cm 7Fr 120cmCath · Class 3 · Implant

All models of GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis (26)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00733132623334), received between Mar 25, 2025 and Nov 3, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Activation Failure3

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 3, 2025Activation Failure; Activation Failure

    ON AN UNSPECIFIED DATE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN ETIOLOGY WHERE A GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS (VIABAHN DEVICE) WAS INTENDED TO BE IMPLANTED IN AN UNKNOWN ANATOMICAL LOCATION. THE PHYSICIAN REACHED THE TARGET TREATMENT AREA AND INITIATED DEPLOYMENT BY PULLING THE DEPLOYMENT LINE. THE DEPLOYMENT LINE WAS ABLE TO UNZIP FROM THE VIABAHN DEVICE, HOWEVER, THE VIABAHN ENDOPROSTHESIS WAS UNABLE TO EXPAND AND REMAINED ON THE DELIVERY CATHETER. THE VIABAHN DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT WITH NO ISSUES AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW VIABAHN DEVICE. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23452127 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 26, 2025Activation Failure; Activation Failure

    THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT UNDER WENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF A VENOUS ANASTOMOSIS OF AN AV GRAFT WITH A GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS (VSX DEVICE). HOWEVER, THE DEPLOYMENT LINE GOT STUCK WHEN THE PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING TO DEPLOY THIS VSX DEVICE IN THE VENOUS ANASTOMOSIS OF AN AV GRAFT. HE TRIED ONE MORE TIME BUT FELT IT WAS SAFER TO REMOVE THIS DEVICE. THE PHYSICIAN SUCCESSFULLY DEPLOYED A NEW VSX DEVICE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22899663 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 25, 2025Activation Failure; Activation Failure

    ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A PROCEDURE WHERE A FISTULA GRAM IN THE RIGHT (UNKNOWN IF IT WAS UPPER, LOWER, OR FOREARM) ARM WAS PERFORMED WHERE A GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS (VIABAHN® DEVICE) WAS USED IN A FISTULA (UNKNOWN IF ARTIFICIAL GRAFT OR NATIVE FISTULA). IT WAS REPORTED THE PHYSICIAN ACCESSED THE PATIENT USING AN UNKNOWN SIZE / BRAND INTRODUCER SHEATH OVER AN UNKNOWN SIZE / BRAND GUIDEWIRE TO THE TARGET TREATMENT ZONE. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THERE WERE ADVANCEMENT ISSUES. REPORTEDLY, THE DEPLOYMENT LINE WAS PULLED AND BROKE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ENDOPROSTHESIS DID NOT DEPLOY. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THERE WAS DISTAL EXPANSION. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED UTILIZING ANOTHER GORE DEVICE. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21689202 ↗

Other Stent, Superficial Femoral Artery devices

All Stent, Superficial Femoral Artery devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page