Skip to content

GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis VBCR081002ARecalls & reported problems

W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · VIABAHN SX ENDO 35 RO 8mmX10cm 8Fr 120cmCath · Class 3 · Implant

All models of GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis (26)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00733132623532), received between Sep 11, 2024 and Apr 8, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Activation Failure3
  • Difficult or Delayed Positioning1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 8, 2026Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Activation Failure

    THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT PRESENTED FOR TREATMENT IN THE LEFT AXILLARY VEIN DUE TO CHRONIC REOCCURRING STENOSIS. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS (VIABAHN® DEVICE) WAS ADVANCED OVER AN 0.035 ANGIODYNAMICS BENTSON GUIDEWIRE. AS REPORTED, THE VIABAHN® DEVICE WAS ADVANCED WITHOUT THE AID OF A SHEATH. DEPLOYMENT WAS STARTED WHEN THE VIABAHN® STENT STARTED MOVING DISTALLY FROM THE TREATMENT AREA. THE VIABAHN® STENT WAS REPOSITIONED, BUT THE VIABAHN® LINE WAS STUCK AND DEPLOYMENT COULD NOT BE CONTINUED. THE CONSTRAINED VIABAHN® DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT WITH NO ISSUES AND NO HARM TO PATIENT. AS REPORTED, THE PHYSICIAN SAID THE ISSUE LIKELY OCCURRED BECAUSE HE REPOSITIONED WHILE DEPLOYING THE STENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24824008 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 19, 2024Activation Failure; Activation Failure

    THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS REPORTED BY THE FSA: ON (B)(6) 2024, A GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS (VIABAHN DEVICE) WAS INTENDED FOR USE IN AN TO LINE A FISTULA FOR DIALYSIS AV ACCESS. THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED THERE WAS FAILURE TO DEPLOY THE DEVICE BECAUSE THE DEPLOYMENT LINE WAS STUCK. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER VIABAHN DEVICE. THERE WERE NO CONSEQUENCES OR IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20260323 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 11, 2024Activation Failure; Activation Failure

    ON (B)(6) 2024, A PATIENT UNDERWENT TREATMENT FOR AN UNKNOWN REASON WHERE AN 8 MM X 10 CM GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS WAS INTENDED TO BE USED IN AN UNKNOWN LOCATION. IT WAS REPORTED THE PHYSICIAN ADVANCED THE DELIVERY CATHETER USING AN 8F INTRODUCER SHEATH (BRAND UNKNOWN) OVER AN .035" ADVANTAGE GLIDEWIRE TO THE TARGET TREATMENT ZONE. REPORTEDLY, DURING DEPLOYMENT THE LINE WAS PULLED AND BECAME CAUGHT, CAUSING THE DEPLOYMENT LINE TO BECOME STRETCHED OUT NEAR THE TURN AROUND. REPORTEDLY, DEPLOYMENT WAS ABORTED, AND THE PHYSICIAN WITHDREW THE CATHETER, WITH THE ENDOPROSTHESIS FULLY CONSTRAINED. THERE WAS NO DISTAL EXPANSION INITIATED OF THE ENDOPROSTHESIS AND THE DEPLOYMENT LINE DID NOT BREAK. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20191361 ↗

Other System, Endovascular Graft, Arteriovenous (Av) Dialysis Access Circuit Stenosis Treatment devices

All System, Endovascular Graft, Arteriovenous (Av) Dialysis Access Circuit Stenosis Treatment devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page