Skip to content

GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis with Heparin VBJR082502ARecalls & reported problems

W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · VIABAHN SX ENDO HEPARIN 18 RO 8mmX25cm 7Fr120cm Cath · Class 3 · Implant

All models of GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis with Heparin (62)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00733132623693), received between Jul 1, 2022 and Jul 16, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Activation Failure1
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 16, 2024Activation Failure; Activation Failure

    THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED TO GORE: DURING TREATMENT OF A STENOSIS IN THE PATIENT'S SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, ACCESS WAS MADE FROM THE CONTRALATERAL SIDE. AS REPORTED, THERE WERE EXISTING DEVICES AT THE AORTIC BIFURCATION, BUT NOT AT THE INTENDED TREATMENT AREA. AN 8FR DESTINATION SHEATH WAS USED TO ADVANCE A GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS WITH HEPARIN BIOACTIVE SURFACE (VIABAHN DEVICE) OVER AN 0.018 GRAND SLAM WIRE. THE VIABAHN DEVICE REACHED THE INTENDED TREATMENT AREA AND DEPLOYMENT WAS INITIATED. THE DEPLOYMENT LINE BECAME STUCK AFTER ABOUT A THIRD OF THE VIABAHN DEVICE EXPANDED. THE DEPLOYMENT LINE COULD NOT BE RELEASED ANY FURTHER. CONSEQUENTLY, A 12FR X 80CM COOK SHEATH WAS INSERTED FROM THE CONTRALATERAL SIDE, AND THE SHEATH WAS USED TO COVER THE PARTIALLY EXPANDED DEVICE. THE VIABAHN DEVICE AND SHEATH WERE THEN REMOVED TOGETHER. THE PROCEDURE CONTINUED WITH DEPLOYMENT OF TWO ADDITIONAL VIABAHN DEVICES. AS REPORTED, THE PROCEDURE TIME WAS PROLONGED DUE TO THE EXTRA MEASURES TAKEN TO REMOVE THE PARTIALLY EXPANDED VIABAHN DEVICE. THE PROCEDURE ENDED WITH GOOD RESULTS AND THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT HAVE AN OPINION OF WHY THE DEP

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19757487 ↗
  • InjuryJul 1, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2022 A PATIENT PRESENTED FOR TREATMENT OF A SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) UTILIZING FOUR GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS WITH HEPARIN BIOACTIVE SURFACE (VIABAHN) DEVICES. THE PATIENT HAD A LARGE ANEURYSM (APPROXIMATELY 5CM) PRESENT IN AN SFA GRAFT THAT WAS TREATED BY OPEN SURGICAL PROCEDURE BELOW THE KNEE. THE ANEURYSMAL GRAFT WAS RELINED WITH FOUR VIABAHN DEVICES. FOLLOW UP APPROXIMATELY ONE WEEK LATER REVEALED ALL DEVICES WERE PATENT AND GOOD BLOOD FLOW WAS MAINTAINED. THE FOLLOWING WEEK, THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT OUTFLOW HAD BEEN LOST AND THE LEG HAD TO BE AMPUTATED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT ALL VIABAHN DEVICES HAD REMAINED OPEN, AND LOSS OF BLOOD FLOW WAS ATTRIBUTED TO OCCLUSION IN THE DISTAL POPLITEAL AND PERONEAL ARTERIES. THERE WAS NO ALLEGATION THAT THE VIABAHN DEVICES DID NOT PERFORM AS INTENDED, AND AMPUTATION WAS DUE TO OTHER FACTORS. ON AN UNKNOWN DAY DURING THE WEEK OF (B)(6) 2022 ((B)(6) USED AS EVENT DATE), THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED THE PATIENT HAD TO RETURN DUE TO AN EXTERNALLY VISIBLE VIABAHN DEVICE IN THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE LEG. THIS WAS THE FIRST VIABAHN DEVICE IMPLANTED IN THE INITIAL PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) (A VBJR082502

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 14886561 ↗

Other System, Endovascular Graft, Arteriovenous (Av) Dialysis Access Circuit Stenosis Treatment devices

All System, Endovascular Graft, Arteriovenous (Av) Dialysis Access Circuit Stenosis Treatment devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page