GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis with Heparin VBJR052502ARecalls & reported problems
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · VIABAHN SX ENDO HEPARIN 18 RO 5mmX25cm 6Fr120cm Cath · Class 3 · Implant
All models of GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis with Heparin (62)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00733132623938), received between Nov 29, 2018 and May 21, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Activation Failure3
- Detachment of Device or Device Component3
- Device Damaged by Another Device1
- Separation Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- No Code Available1
- Perforation1
- Stenosis1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 21, 2026Activation Failure
ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT TREATMENT FOR AN ANEURYSM WITH STENOSIS IN THE UPPER REGION OF AN EXISTING RIGHT FEMORAL-POPLITEAL BYPASS GRAFT (UNKNOWN MANUFACTURE) USING A GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS WITH HEPARIN BIOACTIVE SURFACE (VIABAHN DEVICE). IT WAS REPORTED THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED AND THE DELIVERY CATHETER ADVANCED TO THE TARGET TREATMENT SITE THROUGH A 7F TERUMO PINNACLE® DESTINATION® GUIDING SHEATH OVER A .035" TERUMO GLIDEWIRE ADVANTAGE GUIDEWIRE SUCCESSFULLY. WHEN THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO DEPLOY THE ENDOPROSTHESIS, IT WAS REPORTED ONE-THIRD OF THE DEPLOYMENT LINE WAS PULLED, WHEN BOWSTRINGING WAS OBSERVED AND DEPLOYMENT WAS CEASED. THE PHYSICIAN THEN WITHDREW THE DELIVERY CATHETER THROUGH THE SHEATH WITH NO DELIVERY CATHETER DAMAGE OR ENDOPROSTHESIS DISTAL EXPANSION NOTICED. IT WAS REPORTED THE VIABAHN DEVICE WAS DEPLOYED SUCCESSFULLY ON THE BACK TABLE AND DISCARDED. TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED A NEW DEVICE WAS SELECTED, ADVANCED AND DEPLOYED WITHOUT INCIDENT. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25244628 ↗MalfunctionFeb 2, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2024, A 5MM X 25CM GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS (VSX DEVICE) WAS PLACED AS A POST TERRIER TIBIAL VEIN/ARTERY FISTULA. WITH A V18 GUIDE WIRE THE PHYSICIAN HAD THROUGH AND THROUGH WIRE ACCESS, THROUGH A 7FR TERUMO INTRODUCER SHEATH. AFTER THE VSX DEVICE WAS SUCCESSFULLY DELIVERED, THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE DELIVERY CATHETER. HOWEVER, THE PHYSICIAN FELT RESISTANCE AND CONTINUED TO PULL THE DELIVERY CATHETER. UPON REMOVAL OF THE DELIVERY CATHETER FORM THE PATIENT, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE DISTAL TIP WAS MISSING. WITH THROUGH AND THROUGH WIRE ACCESS THE PHYSICIAN USED AND UNINFLATED BALLOON TO PUSH THE DISTAL TIP OUT OF THE PATIENT. OTHER - APPLICATION AND ANATOMICAL LOCATION, POST TERRIER TIBIAL VEIN/ARTERY FISTULA.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18636122 ↗InjuryJan 17, 2024Separation Failure; Activation Failure; Separation Failure; Activation Failure
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2024, A 5MM X 25CM GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS (VSX DEVICE) WAS INTENDED FOR USE IN THE DISTAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY DURING TREATMENT OF IN STENT RE-STENOSIS OF A BARE METAL STENT. PRIOR TO THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE VSX DEVICE, THE PHYSICIAN PERFORMED A THROMBECTOMY WITH A PENUMBRA SYSTEM TO REMOVE THROMBUS FROM THE BARE METAL STENT. THE PHYSICIAN ADVANCED THE VSX DEVICE THROUGH A 6FR COOK INTRODUCER SHEATH OVER AN 0.018" V18 WIRE AND ATTEMPTED TO DEPLOY THE DEVICE. HOWEVER, AFTER APPROXIMATELY 10CM OF THE VSX DEVICE WAS EXPANDED, THE DEPLOYMENT LINE BROKE. WITH THE VSX DEVICE NOT FULLY DEPLOYED, THE PHYSICIAN CUT THE DELIVERY CATHETER AND LOCATED THE REMAINDER OF THE DEPLOYMENT LINE AND TRIED TO CONTINUE DEPLOYING THE DEVICE WITH HEMOSTATS. WITH THE INABILITY TO CONTINUE DEPLOYMENT, THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO PERFORM A CUT DOWN TO THE VESSEL AND CUT THE DEPLOYMENT CATHETER AS CLOSE THE STENT AS HE COULD AND LEAVE THE UNDEPLOYED VSX DEVICE, DEPLOYMENT CATHETER AND DEPLOYMENT LINE IN THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 18531586 ↗MalfunctionJun 6, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2022, A GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS (VSX DEVICE) WAS INTENDED FOR USE IN THE LEFT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY FOR TREATMENT OF STENOSIS. AFTER THE DEVICE WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED, THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE DELIVERY CATHETER. UPON REMOVAL OF THE DELIVERY CATHETER IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE DISTAL TIP HAD SEPARATED FROM THE CATHETER INSIDE THE PATIENT. AN ANGIOGRAM WAS PERFORMED AND THE DISTAL TIP WAS LOCATED IN THE IMPLANTED DEVICE. THE DECISION WAS MADE TO ADVANCE AN ADDITIONAL 5MM X 5CM VSX DEVICE AND PIN THE DISTAL TIP TO THE WALL OF THE PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED VSX DEVICE. A FINAL ANGIOGRAM WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY THAT THE DISTAL TIP WAS PINNED AGAINST THE WALL AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Stenosis
MAUDE report 14606369 ↗InjuryJan 13, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2021, A GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS WAS TO BE IMPLANTED IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY TO TREAT OCCLUSION. AFTER THE DEVICE WAS ADVANCED UP AND OVER THE AORTIC BIFURCATION TO THE TREATMENT SIGHT, THE PHYSICIAN STARTED TO DEPLOY THE DEVICE WHEN THE DEPLOYMENT LINE BROKE. UNDER FLUOROSCOPY IT WAS NOTICED THAT APPROXIMATELY HALF OF THE DEVICE WAS DEPLOYED. THE PHYSICIAN ADVANCED THE INTRODUCER SHEATH TO THE DEVICE AND TRIED REMOVE THE DEVICE AND SHEATH IN TANDEM. DURING THE ATTEMPTED REMOVAL, THE DEVICE HAD BECOME DISLODGED IN THE COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT HAD A SURGICAL CONVERSION PERFORMED TO EXPLANT THE DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 11158291 ↗InjuryNov 29, 2018Device Damaged by Another Device; Activation Failure; Device Damaged by Another Device; Activation Failure
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED TO GORE: PATIENT PRESENTED WITH THROMBOSIS IN SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). A ZILVER PTX STENT WAS DEPLOYED FIRST BUT BLOOD FLOW WAS NOT RE-ESTABLISHED. CONSEQUENTLY, A GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS WAS ADVANCED IN ORDER TO COVER THE STENOTIC LESION. AS REPORTED, THE ZILVER PTX STENT AND THE VIABAHN DEVICE WERE AT LEAST 2 CM APART IN THE NATIVE VESSEL WITH NO OVERLAP. DURING DEPLOYMENT OF THE VIABAHN DEVICE, THE DEVICE EXPANDED ABOUT 2 CM WHEN THE DEPLOYMENT LINE BECAME STUCK. FURTHER DEPLOYMENT WAS NOT POSSIBLE. A LONGER SHEATH WAS INSERTED AND ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO CAPTURE THE PARTIALLY EXPANDED VIABAHN DEVICE. IN THE PROCESS, THE VIABAHN DEPLOYMENT LINE BECAME ENTANGLED WITH THE ZILVER PTX STENT. AS A RESULT, A CUT DOWN WAS PERFORMED IN THE PATIENT'S RIGHT SFA. THE VIABAHN DEVICE WAS CUT INTO TWO SECTIONS AND REMOVED ALONG WITH THE ZILVER PTX STENT. THE ARTERY WAS REPAIRED AND PATIENT WAS SENT TO RECOVERY.
Patient problems: Perforation
MAUDE report 8117731 ↗
Other System, Endovascular Graft, Arteriovenous (Av) Dialysis Access Circuit Stenosis Treatment devices
- COVERA AVSM10060Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment1 recall33 reports
- COVERA AVSM08060Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment1 recall21 reports
- COVERA AVSM09060Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment1 recall18 reports
- COVERA AVSM10080Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment1 recall16 reports
- COVERA AVSM10040Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment1 recall15 reports
- COVERA AVFM10060Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment1 recall14 reports
- COVERA AVSM09080Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment1 recall1 death14 reports
- COVERA AVSM10100Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment1 recall13 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page