GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis VBCR101002ARecalls & reported problems
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis 10mmx10cm 8Fr 120cmCath · Class 3 · Implant
All models of GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis (26)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00733132645824), received between Dec 15, 2022 and Sep 8, 2026 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Activation Failure2
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Material Separation1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Thrombosis/Thrombus1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 8, 2026Activation Failure; Physical Resistance/Sticking
On (b)(6) 2026, a patient underwent an endovascular procedure to treat a stenotic occlusion at the venous outflow anastomosis of an arteriovenous access graft (brand unknown) using a 10 mm x 10 cm GORE® VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis.It was reported that the delivery catheter advanced through an 8 Fr TERUMO Introducer Sheath over a 0.035-inch TERUMO GLIDWIRE Guidewire to the target treatment site.During deployment of the endoprosthesis, the deployment line was pulled and met resistance at the distal turnaround point of the endoprosthesis. The decision was made to stop deployment. The delivery system was removed from the patient successfully with the catheter intact. It was reported that there was no distal expansion of the endoprosthesis. An attempt was made to deploy the endoprosthesis on the back table, However, this was unsuccessful. To complete the procedure, another GORE® VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis was used with an Amplatz Super Stiff Guidewire.It was reported that there was no impact to the patient.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50669438 ↗MalfunctionDec 5, 2025Activation Failure; Activation Failure
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED TO GORE: DURING TREATMENT OF A BASILIC VEIN OUTFLOW STENOSIS IN A DIALYSIS PATIENT, AN 8FR PINNACLE SHEATH WAS USED TO ADVANCE A GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS (VIABAHN® DEVICE) OVER AN .035 STIFF GLIDE WIRE. AS REPORTED, THERE WERE NO PRE-EXISTING DEVICES IN THE TREATMENT AREA. IT WAS REPORTED THE VIABAHN® DEVICE REACHED THE INTENDED TREATMENT AREA AND DEPLOYMENT WAS STARTED, BUT THE DEPLOYMENT LINE WOULD NOT RELEASE. THE PHYSICIAN TRIED SEVERAL MANEUVERS WITHOUT SUCCESS. THE CONSTRAINED VIABAHN® DEVICE WAS REMOVED. A NEW VIABAHN® DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITH NO ISSUES. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23733687 ↗MalfunctionJul 24, 2025Difficult to Remove; Material Separation; Difficult to Remove; Material Separation
ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ENDOVASCULAR INTERVENTION TO ADDRESS GENERALIZED ARTERIAL DISEASE INVOLVING THE LEFT EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY. A GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS (VIABAHN DEVICE) WAS SUCCESSFULLY DEPLOYED AT THE INTENDED TREATMENT SITE. THE DEVICE WAS ADVANCED AND IMPLANTED WITHOUT RESISTANCE USING AN 8FR COOK MEDICAL INTRODUCER SHEATH AND A TERUMO 0.035" GLIDEWIRE ADVANTAGE® GUIDEWIRE. DURING THE ATTEMPTED WITHDRAWAL OF THE VIABAHN DELIVERY SYSTEM THROUGH THE SHEATH, RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED. THE PHYSICIAN APPLIED ADDITIONAL FORCE, AND UPON REMOVAL, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE DISTAL TIP OF THE DELIVERY SYSTEM HAD DETACHED AND REMAINED WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE DETACHED COMPONENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED USING A SNARE DEVICE. THE PATIENT¿S VASCULAR ANATOMY DEMONSTRATED TYPICAL CALCIFICATION AND TORTUOSITY. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE EFFECTS OR CLINICAL IMPACT TO THE PATIENT AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22589500 ↗MalfunctionDec 15, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS REPORTED TO GORE: A GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS (VSX DEVICE) WAS INTENDED FOR USE IN THE SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY FOR TREATMENT OF IN-STENT STENOSIS. AFTER THE VSX DEVICE WAS ADVANCED THROUGH THE PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED DEVICE, THE PHYSICIAN-INITIATED DEPLOYMENT. AFTER APPROXIMATELY HALF OF THE DEVICE HAD BEEN DEPLOYED, THE DEPLOYMENT LINE BROKE. THE PHYSICIAN CUT THE DEPLOYMENT CATHETER TO TRY AND RETRIEVE THE DEPLOYMENT LINE, WITH NO SUCCESS. THE PHYSICIAN STARTED TO MANIPULATE THE DELIVERY CATHETER AND INTRODUCER SHEATH AND THE REMAINING VSX DEVICE DEPLOYED. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 15992510 ↗
Other System, Endovascular Graft, Arteriovenous (Av) Dialysis Access Circuit Stenosis Treatment devices
- COVERA AVSM10060Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment1 recall33 reports
- COVERA AVSM08060Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment1 recall21 reports
- COVERA AVSM09060Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment1 recall18 reports
- COVERA AVSM10080Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment1 recall16 reports
- COVERA AVSM10040Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment1 recall15 reports
- COVERA AVFM10060Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment1 recall14 reports
- COVERA AVSM09080Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment1 recall1 death14 reports
- COVERA AVSM10100Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (AV) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment1 recall13 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page