GORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis TAC123415ARecalls & reported problems
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · TAG TBE AORTIC COMPONENT TAG TBE AC 12MMX34MMX15CM · Class 3 · Implant
All models of GORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (30)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00733132654192), received between Jan 22, 2023 and Jun 1, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (2 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P210032); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Failure to Advance2
- Activation Failure1
- Device Endoleak1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Clinical Endoleak1
- Stroke/CVA1
- Vascular Dissection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 1, 2026Failure to Advance
ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A TEVAR PROCEDURE TO TREAT A DISSECTION UTILIZING GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS (TBE). THE PATIENT HAD A DEBRANCHING PROCEDURE FOR THE INNOMINATE ARTERY AND CAROTID ARTERY THREE DAYS PRIOR IN PREPARATION FOR THE TEVAR PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, THE TBE AORTIC COMPONENT COULD NOT BE ADVANCED TO THE TARGET LOCATION. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO USE A NEW TBE AORTIC COMPONENT AND STILL COULD NOT ADVANCE THE DEVICE TO THE TARGET LOCATION. THE CAUSE OF THE ADVANCEMENT ISSUES IS UNKNOWN. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PHYSICIAN ELECTED TO USE TWO GORE® TAG® CONFORMABLE THORACIC STENT GRAFT WITH ACTIVE CONTROL SYSTEM (CTAG) TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. AS THERE WERE ADVANCEMENT ISSUES WHEN INSERTING DEVICES FROM THE PATIENT'S GROIN, THE PHYSICIAN RE-OPENED THE PATIENT'S CHEST FROM THE DEBRANCH PROCEDURE AND DELIVERED THE FIRST CTAG DEVICE THROUGH THE SURGICAL GRAFT IN THE ASCENDING AORTA, LANDING DISTAL TO THE ANASTOMOSIS OF THE SURGICAL GRAFT FROM THE DEBRANCH PROCEDURE. THE SECOND CTAG WAS DELIVERED SUCCESSFULLY FROM THE GROIN; HOWEVER, THE LEFT SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY (LSA) WAS COVERED, SO THE PHYSICIAN COMPLETED A CAROTID-SUBCLAVIAN BYPASS. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUC
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25353951 ↗InjuryMay 29, 2026Failure to Advance
ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A TEVAR PROCEDURE TO TREAT A DISSECTION UTILIZING GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS (TBE). THE PATIENT HAD A DEBRANCHING PROCEDURE FOR THE INNOMINATE ARTERY AND CAROTID ARTERY THREE DAYS PRIOR IN PREPARATION FOR THE TEVAR PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, THE TBE AORTIC COMPONENT COULD NOT BE ADVANCED TO THE TARGET LOCATION. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO USE A NEW TBE AORTIC COMPONENT AND STILL COULD NOT ADVANCE THE DEVICE TO THE TARGET LOCATION. THE CAUSE OF THE ADVANCEMENT ISSUES IS UNKNOWN. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PHYSICIAN ELECTED TO USE TWO GORE® TAG® CONFORMABLE THORACIC STENT GRAFT WITH ACTIVE CONTROL SYSTEM (CTAG) TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. AS THERE WERE ADVANCEMENT ISSUES WHEN INSERTING DEVICES FROM THE PATIENT'S GROIN, THE PHYSICIAN RE-OPENED THE PATIENT'S CHEST FROM THE DEBRANCH PROCEDURE AND DELIVERED THE FIRST CTAG DEVICE THROUGH THE SURGICAL GRAFT IN THE ASCENDING AORTA, LANDING DISTAL TO THE ANASTOMOSIS OF THE SURGICAL GRAFT FROM THE DEBRANCH PROCEDURE. THE SECOND CTAG WAS DELIVERED SUCCESSFULLY FROM THE GROIN; HOWEVER, THE LEFT SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY (LSA) WAS COVERED, SO THE PHYSICIAN COMPLETED A CAROTID-SUBCLAVIAN BYPASS. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUC
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25332301 ↗MalfunctionMar 13, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED: ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS (TBE AORTIC COMPONENT AND SIDE BRANCH) AND GORE® TAG® CONFORMABLE THORACIC STENT GRAFT WITH ACTIVE CONTROL SYSTEM TO TREAT A THORACIC DISSECTION WITH AN ANEURYSM COMPONENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER PULLING THE DEPLOYMENT LINE OF THE TBE AORTIC COMPONENT, THE DEPLOYMENT WAS INCOMPLETE (DEVICE ONLY DEPLOYED AT 50%). THE PHYSICIAN DELIVERED A PTA 12MM BALLOON AND SLOWLY BALLOONED THE DEVICE AND IT FULLY DEPLOYED. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EVENT TO THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE CONCLUDED WITH NO FURTHER SEQUELA. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, THERE WERE NO ANATOMIC CONSTRAINTS AND NO ANATOMY TORTUOSITY.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 24599649 ↗InjuryJan 5, 2026Device Endoleak
THE FIELD SALES ASSOCIATE (FSA) REPORTED THE FOLLOWING TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURE TO TREAT A DISSECTION UTILIZING THE GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS IN ZONE 2. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE. ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REINTERVENTION PROCEDURE TO ADDRESS A TYPE 1A ENDOLEAK. THE PHYSICIAN IMPLANTED A GORE® TAG® CONFORMABLE THORACIC STENT GRAFT WITH ACTIVE CONTROL SYSTEM ALONG WITH A GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS TO RESOLVE THE ENDOLEAK. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Clinical Endoleak
MAUDE report 23966701 ↗MalfunctionApr 25, 2025Activation Failure; Activation Failure
THE FIELD SALES ASSOCIATE (FSA) REPORTED THE FOLLOWING TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURE TO TREAT AN ANEURYSM UTILIZING THE GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS IN ZONE 2. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A DEPLOYMENT FAILURE. THE PHYSICIAN PULLED THE DEPLOYMENT LINE FASTER THAN THE FSA SUGGESTED. THE BACK HALF OF THE STENT WAS UNABLE TO BE DEPLOYED. THE PHYSICIAN BALLOONED THE STENT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WERE NO ANATOMIC CONSTRAINTS. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE. THE PHYSICIAN STATED THAT EXCESSIVE WIRE WRAP OF THE PIGTAIL AND DEVICE MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21914196 ↗InjuryMar 22, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2022, THIS PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT FOR A ZONE 2 TYPE B DISSECTION AND WAS IMPLANTED WITH GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESES. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT HE BELIEVES THE DISSECTION HAS EXTENDED DISTALLY AND WANTS TO EXTEND COVERAGE DISTALLY TO COVER ANOTHER POSSIBLE FENESTRATION IN THE TRUE FALSE LUMEN SPACE. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REINTERVENTION AND TWO ADDITIONAL GORE® TAG® CONFORMABLE THORACIC STENT GRAFT WITH ACTIVE CONTROL SYSTEM WERE IMPLANTED DISTALLY TO EXTEND COVERAGE. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 16595272 ↗InjuryJan 22, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2022, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF A ZONE 0 THORACIC AORTIC ANEURYSM USING GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESES. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY WAS EXTREMELY TORTUOUS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A STROKE POST PROCEDURE. THE PHYSICIAN ALSO NOTED THAT IT MAY HAVE OCCURRED INTRA PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY THE CAUSE OF THE STROKE IS UNKNOWN, BUT IT WAS SUSPECTED TO BE RELATED TO WIRE AND DEVICE MANIPULATION. DUE TO THE ANATOMICAL TORTUOSITY, THERE WAS ALSO DIFFICULTY REPORTED WHILE ATTEMPTING TO ALIGN THE PORTAL OF THE THORACIC BRANCH AORTIC COMPONENT TO THE OUTER CURVE IN AORTIC ZONE 0. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT REMAINED IN THE HOSPITAL POST PROCEDURE FOR STROKE COMPLICATIONS INCLUDING APHASIA. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S APHASIA WAS SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVED, AND THE PATIENT WAS WALKING WITH THE PHYSICAL THERAPIST. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTEDLY DISCHARGED TO HOME ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2022.
Patient problems: Stroke/CVA
MAUDE report 16221805 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P210032. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2672-2026 · May 19, 2026 · Open, ClassifiedGORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis Side Branch Component Catalog Numbers (by Region) United States (includes Puerto Rico) and Canada: TSB080806A, TSB081006A, TSB081206A, TSB08
Other System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment devices
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2814C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls34 deaths254 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF3214C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls19 deaths173 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF3614C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT1 recall37 deaths214 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2514C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls18 deaths136 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2314C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls9 deaths60 reports
- RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Graft System 28-N4-34-154-34UBolton Medical Inc. · System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment3 recalls7 reports
- Vela Proximal Endograft System A34-34/C100-O20 VEndologix LLC · System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment3 deaths152 reports
- Endurant® II ETCF2828C49EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls7 deaths44 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page