Skip to content

GORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis TAC124515ARecalls & reported problems

W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · TAG TBE AORTIC COMPONENT TAG TBE AC 12MMX45MMX15CM · Class 3 · Implant

All models of GORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (30)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00733132654253), received between Jul 27, 2023 and Jul 29, 2026 — classified as 1 death, 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Endoleak” (1 report).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P210032); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Device Endoleak1
  • Premature Activation1

Patient problems

  • Vascular Dissection2
  • Clinical Endoleak1
  • Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Post Operative Wound Infection1
  • Thrombosis/Thrombus1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 29, 2026Device Endoleak

    The following was reported to Gore: On (b)(6), 2026, the patient underwent an endovascular reintervention to treat a Type IA endoleak associated with a previously implanted GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (TBE). To address the endoleak, the physician elected to reline the previously implanted zone 2 TBE with a zone 0 TBE. As part of the repair, the side branch needed to be extended beyond the distal end of the newly implanted zone 0 TBE component. A GORE® VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis with HEPARIN Bioactive Surface (VIABAHN Device) and a GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent (FORTEGRA Device) were deployed through the portal of the previously implanted zone 2 TBE and extended below the trailing end of the zone 0 TBE. The physician elected to use the VIABAHN Device and the FORTEGRA Device to reinforce the TBE side branch and aid in radial force.During the procedure, the VIABAHN Device was implanted fist then the FORTEGRA Device. When withdrawing the FORTEGRA delivery catheter, the catheter tip appeared to have gotten stuck on the VIABAHN Device and pulled on both the VIABAHN Device and FORTEGRA Device back, creating a gap. The physician was unable to remove the FORTEGRA delivery

    Patient problems: Clinical Endoleak

    MAUDE report 50075152 ↗
  • DeathJun 1, 2026Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A THORACIC ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC REPAIR TO TREAT AN ANEURYSM, UTILIZING GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS (TBE AORTIC COMPONENT). IT WAS REPORTED DURING ADVANCEMENT OF THE TBE DEVICE THROUGH THE 24 FR SHEATH, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE SYSTEM¿S THROUGH-WIRE HAD INADVERTENTLY PASSED BEHIND A PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED PALMAZ STENT. THE TBE AND THE 24 FR SHEATH WERE REMOVED AS ONE UNIT. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THE ANGULATION THROUGHOUT THE DESCENDING AORTA AND ARCH WAS QUITE EXTENSIVE. A GORE® TAG® CONFORMABLE THORACIC STENT GRAFT WITH ACTIVE CONTROL (CTAGAC) STENT GRAFT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY DEPLOYED TO SECURE AND ENTRAP THE EXISTING PALMAZ STENT, FOLLOWED BY BALLOONING OF THE CTAGAC DEVICE TO OPTIMIZE WALL APPOSITION. ALLEGEDLY WHILE ATTEMPTING TO REINTRODUCE A LUNDERQUIST WIRE, THE PATIENT'S BLOOD PRESSURE DROPPED. CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION WAS INITIATED IMMEDIATELY. AN INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMP WAS INSERTED VIA THE EXISTING 24 × 65 DRYSEAL SHEATH. TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY DEMONSTRATED NO PERICARDIAL EFFUSION. CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY REVEALED EXTENSIVE THROMBUS WITHIN THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) ARTERY. M

    Patient problems: Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension; Thrombosis/Thrombus

    MAUDE report 25352591 ↗
  • InjuryMay 26, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REINTERVENTION FOR TREATMENT OF A PENETRATING AORTIC ULCER (PAU) FOLLOWING PRIOR TEVAR, WITH A ZONE 0 (BRACHIOCEPHALIC ARTERY [BCA]/ASCENDING AORTA) REPAIR UTILIZING A GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS. AT THE SIX-MONTH FOLLOW-UP, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) IMAGING DEMONSTRATED NO ABNORMALITIES. ON (B)(6) 2026, A ONE-YEAR FOLLOW-UP CT SCAN IDENTIFIED A RETROGRADE TYPE A AORTIC DISSECTION ORIGINATING AT THE SINOTUBULAR JUNCTION (STJ). THE FINDING WAS SUBSEQUENTLY REPORTED TO GORE ON (B)(6) 2026. THE EXACT ONSET DATE OF THE DISSECTION IS UNKNOWN. THE REPORTER INDICATED THAT THE EVENT OCCURRED AT AN INDETERMINATE TIME BETWEEN THE SIX-MONTH AND ONE-YEAR FOLLOW-UP INTERVALS. AT THE TIME OF REPORTING, THE PATIENT WAS DESCRIBED AS CLINICALLY STABLE. NO DEFINITIVE CAUSE FOR THE DISSECTION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. THE TREATING PHYSICIAN IS CURRENTLY EVALUATING TREATMENT OPTIONS. POTENTIAL MANAGEMENT MAY INCLUDE OPEN SURGICAL REPAIR; HOWEVER, NO INTERVENTION HAD BEEN SCHEDULED AT THE TIME OF REPORTING.

    Patient problems: Vascular Dissection

    MAUDE report 25285828 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 6, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE FOLLOWING DETAILS WERE REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2025, THIS PATIENT UNDERWENT ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF A ZONE 0 (ASCENDING AORTA) WITH BCA (BRACHIOCEPHALIC ARTERY) TEVAR TREATMENT FOR ANEURYSM FROM A DISSECTION. THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS DEVICE AND GORE® TAG® CONFORMABLE THORACIC STENT GRAFT WITH ACTIVE CONTROL SYSTEM (TSB121706A, TGMR373115, TSB121706A, TAC124515A, TE4546A). THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WITH GOOD RESULTS. ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REINTERVENTION TO TREAT CONTINUED ANEURYSMAL DEGENERATION OF THE ANEURYSM DUE TO INFECTION OF THE PATIENT¿S AORTA AND OF THE ANEURYSM. THE SIDE BRANCH DEVICE WAS EXTENDED PROXIMALLY AND THE TBE AORTIC COMPONENT WAS EXTENDED WITH A CTAG. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE. THE CAUSE OF THE INFECTION IS NOT KNOWN. THE PHYSICIAN REPORTS THAT AT THE PATIENT¿S 30-DAY FOLLOW-UP COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) ALL LOOKED GOOD HEALTHY AND NO DEVICE ISSUES OR CONCERNS NOTED. THE PATIENT HAD OBSERVED DEVICE ISSUES. THE PATIENT THEN STATED THEY HAD A FOLLOW-UP CT AT ANOTHER HOSPITAL IN JANUARY AND THE AORTA HAD GOTTEN PROGRESSIVELY WORSE. THE PHYSICIAN DOES NOT KNOW IF THERE WAS UND

    Patient problems: Post Operative Wound Infection

    MAUDE report 24283686 ↗
  • InjuryJun 3, 2024Premature Activation; Premature Activation

    THE FSA REPORTED THE FOLLOWING TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURE IN ZONE 0 - ASCENDING AORTA TO TREAT AN ANEURYSM UTILIZING THE GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS (AORTIC COMPONENT). IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROXIMAL END OF THE DEVICE WAS PREMATURELY DEPLOYED DUE TO THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTING TO RETRACT IT BACK INTO THE SHEATH TO REMOVE IT DUE TO EXCESSIVE WIRE WRAP. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO REMOVE THE GRAFT AND FINISH THE CASE WITH A NEW TBE GRAFT. UPON REMOVAL OF THE SHEATH THERE WAS SLOW FLOW DOWN THE RIGHT EXTERNAL ILIAC ARTERY. HE USED AN IVUS TO CONFIRM A SMALL INTIMAL DISSECTION AND USED A 10X30 CORDIS SMART STENT TO RESOLVE IT. HE BELIEVES THE EXTERNAL ILIAC WAS DAMAGED BY THE SHEATH AS THERE WAS SOME INTIMAL TISSUE ON IT WHEN IT WAS REMOVED. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE FELT WHEN ADVANCING THE SHEATH. THE PATIENT IS DOING FINE THIS MORNING WITH NO LEG PERFUSION ISSUES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19447199 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE FIELD SALES ASSOCIATE REPORTED THE FOLLOWING: ON (B)(6), 2023, THE PATIENT WAS TREATED FOR A ZONE 2 TYPE B THORACIC DISSECTION WITH GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS (TBE). IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHILE THE PHYSICIAN WAS ADVANCING THE GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS TAC124515A/(B)(6), THROUGH THE BLADDER OF THE GORE® DRYSEAL FLEX INTRODUCER SHEATH (DSF2465/(B)(6)) THE ¿NITINOL FISHTAILS OUTSIDE OF THE DEVICE PUNCTURED THE BLADDER OF THE SHEATH¿. THERE WAS APPROXIMATELY LESS THAN 100CC OF BLOOD LOSS, NO HEMODYNAMIC IMPAIRMENT, AND NO BLOOD TRANSFUSION WAS REQUIRED. THE SHEATH WAS REMOVED, AND A DIFFERENT DEVICE WAS USED FOR THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Vascular Dissection

    MAUDE report 17410129 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under P210032. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2672-2026 · May 19, 2026 · Open, Classified
    GORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis Side Branch Component Catalog Numbers (by Region) United States (includes Puerto Rico) and Canada: TSB080806A, TSB081006A, TSB081206A, TSB08

Other System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment devices

All System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page