GORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis TE3140ARecalls & reported problems
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · TAG TBE THORACIC AORTIC EXT 31mmX4.0cm 4mm · Class 3 · Implant
All models of GORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (30)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00733132654307), received between Feb 23, 2023 and Apr 25, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Positioning Problem” (2 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P210032); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Positioning Problem2
- Malposition of Device1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Obstruction/Occlusion1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 25, 2025Positioning Problem; Positioning Problem
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH A GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS AORTIC EXTENDER IN THE ASCENDING AORTA TO COVER THE DISTAL ANASTOMOSIS FROM A PREVIOUS CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT OPEN REPAIR. REPORTEDLY THE CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS OPEN REPAIR OCCURRED APPROXIMATELY A MONTH AGO. THE PROXIMAL LUMEN OF THE ARTERY DIAMETER WAS 24-26 MM AND THE DISTAL LUMEN OF THE ARTERY DIAMETER WAS 10 MM. THE DISTAL AREA WAS CAUSING A STRICTURE IN THE ARTERY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS AORTIC EXTENDER WAS DEPLOYED, THERE WAS SOME RESISTANCE IN REMOVING THE DELIVERY CATHETER. SOME FORCE WAS USED TO REMOVE THE DELIVERY CATHETER AND WHILE DOING SO THE GRAFT WAS PULLED DOWN APPROXIMATELY 5 TO 6 MM. THIS CAUSED PARTIAL COVERAGE OF THE INNOMINATE ARTERY. THE PHYSICIAN CHOSE TO USE A BARE METAL STENT IN THIS AREA. THE BARE METAL STENT WAS DEPLOYED IN THE INNOMINATE ARTERY GOING INTO THE RIGHT COMMON CAROTID ARTERY, DUE TO THE INNOMINATE ARTERY BEING SHORT (2 CM). THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE. IT IS UNKNOWN WHAT CAUSED THE DEVICE TO MOVE AFTER DEPLOYMENT. THE OLIVE MAY HAVE CAUGHT ON THE EDGE OF
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21912669 ↗InjuryMay 14, 2024Positioning Problem; Positioning Problem
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON FRIDAY (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT HAD A CAROTID TO LEFT SUBCLAVIAN BYPASS TO TREAT A PSEUDOANEURYSM ON THE INNER CURVE OF THE AORTA. ON FRIDAY (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT WAS FURTHER TREATED FOR THE PSEUDOANEURYSM WITH GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESES, WITH THE BRANCH GOING INTO THE LEFT SUBCLAVIAN. AFTER DEPLOYMENT, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THEY NEEDED TO EXTEND PROXIMALLY WITH AN AORTIC EXTENDER. AFTER DEPLOYING THE EXTENDER, THE ANGIOGRAPHY SHOWED THAT THE INNOMINATE ARTERY WAS COVERED 30-40%. THE PHYSICIAN ADVANCED A CODA BALLOON ON THE DIAGNOSTIC WIRE FROM THE PIGTAIL, WHICH HAD BEEN LOCATED DISTAL OF THE EXTENDER. THE BALLOON WAS USED IN AN ATTEMPT TO DISLODGE THE EXTENDER AND MOVE IT DISTALLY, BUT THIS ATTEMPT FAILED. THE PHYSICIAN THEN ATTEMPTED TO USE A SNARE TO PULL THE EXTENDER CUFF DISTALLY. HOWEVER, WHEN THIS WAS ATTEMPTED, THE EXTENDER MIGRATED QUICKLY PROXIMALLY, LANDING IN THE ASCENDING AORTA. THIS MIGRATION RESOLVED THE PREVIOUS COVERAGE ISSUE; HOWEVER, THE EXTENDER DID NOT HAVE APPOSITION AGAINST THE VESSEL. BECAUSE THE EXTENDER WAS HIGHLY LIKELY TO MIGRATE, A BARE METAL STENT WAS INSERTED TO PIN THE EXTENDER AGAINST THE VE
Patient problems: Obstruction/Occlusion
MAUDE report 19310702 ↗InjuryFeb 23, 2023Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT WAS TREATED FOR A THORACIC AORTIC ANEURYSM. THE PHYSICIAN IMPLANTED A GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS. THE DEVICE PARTIALLY COVERED THE CAROTID ARTERY. THY PHYSICIAN CUT DOWN AND STENTED THE CAROTID. THE PHYSICIAN IS UNSURE WHY THE CAROTID WAS PARTIALLY COVERED. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16427937 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P210032. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2672-2026 · May 19, 2026 · Open, ClassifiedGORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis Side Branch Component Catalog Numbers (by Region) United States (includes Puerto Rico) and Canada: TSB080806A, TSB081006A, TSB081206A, TSB08
Other System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment devices
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2814C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls34 deaths254 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF3214C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls19 deaths173 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF3614C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT1 recall37 deaths214 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2514C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls18 deaths136 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2314C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls9 deaths60 reports
- RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Graft System 28-N4-34-154-34UBolton Medical Inc. · System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment3 recalls7 reports
- Vela Proximal Endograft System A34-34/C100-O20 VEndologix LLC · System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment3 deaths152 reports
- Endurant® II ETCF2828C49EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls7 deaths44 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page