GORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis TE3742ARecalls & reported problems
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · TAG TBE THORACIC AORTIC EXT 37mmX4.2cm 5mm · Class 3 · Implant
All models of GORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis (30)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00733132654321), received between Sep 20, 2023 and Jun 4, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Malposition of Device” (2 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P210032); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Malposition of Device2
- Device Endoleak1
- Patient-Device Incompatibility1
Patient problems
- Obstruction/Occlusion3
- Clinical Endoleak1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 4, 2026Device Endoleak
THE FIELD SALES ASSOCIATE (FSA) REPORTED THE FOLLOWING TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURE TO TREAT AN ANEURYSM UTILIZING THE GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS (TBE). ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A 2ND STAGED ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURE UTILIZING THE GORE® EXCLUDER® THORACOABDOMINAL BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS (TAMBE). ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT RETURNED FOR A REINTERVENTION BASED ON CT FINDINGS THAT SUGGESTED A TYPE IA ENDOLEAK AT THE PROXIMAL TBE GRAFT. THE INTERVAL CT SCAN BETWEEN THE TBE AND TAMBE PROCEDURES HAD SHOWN NO EVIDENCE OF ENDOLEAK; HOWEVER, THE POST TAMBE CT SCAN RAISED CONCERN FOR A PROXIMAL TYPE IA LEAK. DURING THE PROCEDURE, AN ARTERIOGRAM WAS PERFORMED TO IDENTIFY THE SOURCE OF THE SUSPECTED TYPE IA ENDOLEAK. NO TYPE IA ENDOLEAK WAS VISUALIZED. INSTEAD, A TYPE III ENDOLEAK DUE TO COMPONENT DISCONNECTION WAS IDENTIFIED BETWEEN THE TBE MAIN GRAFT AND A TBE EXTENDER. A SECOND EXTENDER WAS PLACED, BUT THIS DID NOT RESOLVE THE LEAK. THE PHYSICIAN THEN ELECTED TO USE A 9 × 7.5 CM VIABAHN TO EXTEND THE TBE SIDE BRANCH BACK INTO THE AORTA, FOLLOWED BY PLACEMENT OF A 37 × 10 GORE® TAG® CONFORMABLE THORACIC STENT GRAFT WITH ACTIV
Patient problems: Clinical Endoleak
MAUDE report 25391565 ↗InjuryMar 9, 2026Malposition of Device
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2026, PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURE TO TREAT AA PENETRATING AORTIC ULCER (PAU) AND INTRAMURAL HEMATOMA (IMH) UTILIZING A GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS (AORTIC EXTENDER). REPORTEDLY, THE AORTIC EXTENDER JUMPED FORWARD DURING DEPLOYMENT WITH APPROXIMATELY 8-10MM AND COVERED APPROXIMATELY 90% OF THE LEFT COMMON CAROTID ARTERY (LCCA) INADVERTENTLY. PHYSICIAN PERFORMED A LEFT SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY (LSA) -LCCA BYPASS TO REVASCULARIZE THE LEFT COMMON CAROTID ARTERY WITH BLOOD FLOW RESTORED TO NORMAL AND THE PATIENT IS DOING WELL AND HAS BEEN DISCHARGED WITH NO ISSUES POST-OP. THE CAUSE OF THE AORTIC EXTENDER MOVING FORWARD DURING DEPLOYMENT IS UNKNOWN AND THERE WERE NO ANATOMICAL CHALLENGES WITH TORTUOSITY OR CALCIUM.
Patient problems: Obstruction/Occlusion
MAUDE report 24551644 ↗InjuryNov 28, 2023Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED TO GORE: ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A BRANCHED THORACIC ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC REPAIR (TEVAR) PROCEDURE TO TREAT AN ARCH PSEUDOANEURYSM IN ZONE 2 LEFT COMMON CAROTID ARTERY (LCCA) UTILIZING A GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS (TBE). REPORTEDLY, DURING DEPLOYMENT GORE® TAG® THORACIC BRANCH ENDOPROSTHESIS (STENT GRAFT THORACIC BRANCH AORTIC EXTENDER) THERE WAS AN ISSUE THAT THE PHYSICIAN WAS AWARE OF PRIOR TO PROCEDURE THAT THE PROXIMAL END OF THE PLANNED TBE DEVICE (TAC083415A) WAS NOT LIKELY TO EXTEND BEYOND THE PAU AS THE PAU STARTED IN ZONE 2 ((IE. PROXIMAL SEAL ZONE DID NOT MEET IFU FOR TBE DEVICE). IN ANTICIPATION OF THIS, THE PHYSICIAN PLANNED TO EXTEND PROXIMAL TO THE LEFT COMMON CAROTID ARTERY (LCCA) WITH THE TE3742A (AORTIC EXTENDER) IN ORDER TO SEAL BEYOND THE PAU. DURING DEPLOYMENT OF TE3742A, THERE WAS 4-5MM OF PROXIMAL MIGRATION OF THE DEVICE RESULTING IN PARTIAL COVERAGE OF THE LCCA. TO ENSURE ADEQUATE PERFUSION (BLOOD FLOW) OF LCCA, PHYSICIAN PLACED A 8 X 29MM GORE® VIABAHN® VBX BALLOON EXPANDABLE ENDOPROSTHESIS IN THE LCCA AND POST-DILATED TO 10MM PUSHING PROXIMAL EDGE OF THE TE3742A GRAFT BACK. PATIENT IS DOING WELL POST-OP
Patient problems: Obstruction/Occlusion
MAUDE report 18221256 ↗InjurySep 20, 2023Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility
ON (B)(6) 2023, A CT SCAN WAS PERFORMED WHICH REVEALED THE SAME TYPE 1 ENDOLEAK, WITH NO CHANGES OR SIGNS OF IMPROVEMENT. POST-OP IMAGING SHOWED THAT THE AORTIC EXTENDER WAS ~3.5CM PROXIMAL TO THE TBE AORTIC COMPONENT.
Patient problems: Obstruction/Occlusion
MAUDE report 17786143 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P210032. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2672-2026 · May 19, 2026 · Open, ClassifiedGORE TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis Side Branch Component Catalog Numbers (by Region) United States (includes Puerto Rico) and Canada: TSB080806A, TSB081006A, TSB081206A, TSB08
Other System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment devices
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2814C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls34 deaths254 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF3214C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls19 deaths173 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF3614C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT1 recall37 deaths214 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2514C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls18 deaths136 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2314C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls9 deaths60 reports
- RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Graft System 28-N4-34-154-34UBolton Medical Inc. · System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment3 recalls7 reports
- Vela Proximal Endograft System A34-34/C100-O20 VEndologix LLC · System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment3 deaths152 reports
- Endurant® II ETCF2828C49EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls7 deaths44 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page