NIM Vital NIM4CM01RFRecalls & reported problems
Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · CONSOLE NIM4CM01RF NIM 4.0 REFURBISHED · Class 2
All models of NIM Vital (9)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
2 open recalls name this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 2
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000002992), received between Apr 1, 2024 and Sep 24, 2026 — classified as 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings” (3 reports).
2 FDA recall records name this device's identifier, 2 still open.
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K200759); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Mar 10, 2025Class IIOpen, Classified
Nerve Monitoring System with certain software versions has potential for increased stimulus artifact, which may require troubleshooting, and may lead to procedure delay, extubation, and medical intervention.
Z-1623-2025 · Root cause: Software change control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Jun 24, 2024Class IOpen, Classified
Potential for false negative response on the NIM Vital Nerve Monitoring System
Z-2409-2024 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings3
- False Negative Result2
- Inappropriate Audible Prompt/Feedback2
- False Positive Result1
- Noise, Audible1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
- Insufficient Information2
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 24, 2026Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
It was reported that intra-op, the NIM Console had not stimulation properly, switched from brief tone to continuous, at first there was no stimulation response but when probe was removed and put back on the nerve it gave an overwhelming response. No patient impact or injury.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50877735 ↗MalfunctionFeb 3, 2026Inappropriate Audible Prompt/Feedback
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CASE WHEN SURGEON WAS ATTEMPTING TO MONITOR, RECEIVED EXCESSIVE NOISE FROM THE SYSTEM. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24255123 ↗MalfunctionOct 21, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED, THE EVENT OCCURRED PRIOR TO USE. TROUBLESHOOTING DONE, REMOVED BATTERY AND POWERED BACK UP AND STILL BEEPING. REP REPORTED SWAPPING TO AN OUTLET BUT STILL IN THE HALLWAY AREA. ISSUE STILL NOT RESOLVED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23345437 ↗MalfunctionJun 24, 2025Noise, Audible; Noise, Audible
IT WAS REPORTED THAT NIM VITAL WAS GIVING LOUD FEEDBACKS. ALSO THE BLUE POWER LIGHT TURNING YELLOW INSTEAD BLUE. THERE WAS NO KNOWN PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 22313135 ↗MalfunctionMay 16, 2025False Negative Result; False Negative Result
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING TESTING, WHEN USING THE PROB TO DELIVERY ENERGY, NOTHING HAPPENS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22036797 ↗MalfunctionFeb 3, 2025False Positive Result; False Positive Result
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THERE WERE UNUSUAL SIGNALS, LOOKING LIKE DIRECT STIMULATION OF THE MUSCLE, THAT ENABLED TO SEE THE REAL SIGNAL. THE HARDWARE SET-UP WAS VERIFIED BEFORE THE USE AND THE SURGEON OBSERVED THE WAVEFORM RESPONSE ON THE SCREEN. THE ACTIVITY OCCUR ONLY DURING THE STIMULATION. THERE WAS NO TONE WHEN USING ELECTROCAUTERY. AFTER CHANGING THE REJECTION PERIOD TO 3.5 MS, IT WAS A BIT BETTER BUT NOT COMPLETELY. THE SOFTWARE VERSION 1.6.4 WAS PRESENT DURING THE EVENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21291458 ↗MalfunctionDec 1, 2024Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SYSTEM'S PATIENT INTERFACE HAS PHYSICAL DAMAGE AND INTERMITTENT PAIRING CONNECTIVITY TO THE CONSOLE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED IN THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20815944 ↗MalfunctionApr 1, 2024False Negative Result; Inappropriate Audible Prompt/Feedback; False Negative Result; Inappropriate Audible Prompt/Feedback
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PAROTID CASE, THE SURGEON HAD A NEGATIVE TONE (TWEEDLE) WHEN TOUCHING A NERVE. PHYSICIAN EXPECTED TO HEAR THE POSITIVE ¿BUMP BUMP BUMP¿ BIPHASIC WAVE SOUND INDICATING THE NERVE WAS BEING STIMULATED. INSTEAD, THE TWEEDLE INDICATING THAT THEY WERE NOT TOUCHING NERVE RESPONDED. PHYSICIAN WAS CONFIDENT HE WAS ON NERVE. OLDER PHYSICIAN THAT WAS TRAINED WITHOUT THE NIM AND VERY STRONG ANATOMY KNOWLEDGE. FELT STRONGLY THAT THE SYSTEM WAS INCORRECT. THE PROCEDURE WAS EXTENDED FOR LESS THAN 1 HOUR. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT. EVENT COULD NOT BE REPLICATED BY REP OR BIOMED. USED SUBSEQUENTLY WITH DIFFERENT PI BOX AND WORKED AS EXPECTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19012270 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K200759. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1224-2022 · May 3, 2022 · Open, ClassifiedNIM Vital Patient Interface 4.0 (P/N: NIM4CPB1) NIM with Software version 1.3.2
- Z-1223-2022 · May 3, 2022 · Open, ClassifiedNIM Vital Console 4.0 (P/N: NIM4CM01) NIM with Software version 1.3.2
Other STIMULATOR, NERVE devices
- NIM Vital NIM4CM01Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE2 recalls260 reports
- NIM TriVantage® 8229707Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE2 recalls176 reports
- NIM® 8229306Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE1 recall1 death167 reports
- NIM Vital™ NIM4CPB1Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE3 recalls45 reports
- NIM Trivantage® 8229707Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE1 recall142 reports
- NIM® 8229307Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE1 recall138 reports
- NIM TriVantage® 8229706Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE2 recalls78 reports
- NIM-Response® 8253002Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE171 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page