Skip to content

TrailBlazer™ Angled ASC-018-150Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · PS ASC-018-150 TRAILBLAZER ANGLED V03 · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000104696), received between Oct 7, 2020 and Jan 26, 2026 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component4
  • Difficult to Advance3
  • Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Positioning Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 26, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PERIPHERAL PROCEDURE INVOLVING THE TRAILBLAZER ANGLED CATHETER, A PATIENT WAS TREATED FOR A PLAQUE LESION WITH 70% STENOSIS LOCATED IN THE MID SEGMENT OF THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, WHICH EXHIBITED MODERATE TORTUOSITY AND MODERATE CALCIFICATION. THE CURVED TIP OF THE CATHETER BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY.THE TIP DID NOT FULLY DETACH FROM THE DEVICE, WAS REMOVED NORMALLY AND SAFELY FROM THE PATIENT WITHOUT ISSUE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY REPLACING THE DEVICE WITH ANOTHER PRODUCT OF THE SAME MODEL. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24176223 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 26, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Advance; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO USE A TRAILBLAZER TO TREAT A PLAQUE LESION IN THE MID SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. DEGREE OF TORTUOSITY WAS NONE. DEGREE OF CALCIFICATION WAS MODERATE. LESION STENOSIS WAS CTO (CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION-100%). 6F TERUMO SHEATH FRENCH WAS USED. A COMAND 18 GUIDEWIRE WAS USED. THE VESSEL WAS PRE-DILATED. IFU WAS FOLLOWED. IT IS REPORTED THAT PROXIMAL END OF SUPPORT CATHETER DETACHED DURING INITIAL ADVANCEMENT. RESISTANCE WAS FELT DURING ADVANCEMENT. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A STRAIGHT SUPPORT CATHETER. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17395443 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 15, 2020Difficult to Remove; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance; Positioning Problem; Difficult to Remove; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance; Positioning Problem

    PHYSICIAN INTENDED TO USE AN ANGLED TRAILBLAZER SUPPORT CATHETER DURING LEFT LEG ANGIOPLASTY OF THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). IT IS REPORTED THE OSTIAL SFA WAS ENGAGED USING THE ANGLED TRAILBLAZER DEVICE AND A NON-MEDTRONIC WIRE. THE PHYSICIAN UPGRADED TO A 0.035 STIFF ANGLED WIRE AND NON-MEDTRONIC SUPPORT CATHETER. IT IS REPORTED THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO PASS THE CATHETER BEYOND THE DISTAL SFA AND THE WIRE AND CATHETER WERE CHANGED FOR A NON-MEDTRONIC 0.018 WIRE AND TRAIBLAZER TO MAKE A SECOND ATTEMPT. IT IS REPORTED THE PHYSICIAN STILL HAD TROUBLE AND DECIDED TO PERFORM ANGIOPLASTY OF THE ENTIRE SFA. IT IS REPORTED THE WIRE APPEARED TO BE IN THE LUMEN AT THE POPLITEAL ARTERY. THE PHYSICIAN ADVANCED THE TRAILBLAZER BUT DIFFICULTY WAS EXPERIENCED AND DURING THE ADVANCEMENT ATTEMPT THE DEVICE KINKED. THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO REMOVE THE WIRE AND HAD TO REMOVE THE ENTIRE SYSTEM, IT IS REPORTED DURING THE MANIPULATION THE HUB BROKE OFF THE DEVICE. IT IS REPORTED THE WIRES WOULD NOT SLIDE THROUGH THE CATHETER AND FELT STICKY. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11009973 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 18, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Advance; Material Twisted/Bent

    THE OSTIAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) WAS ENGAGED USING 0.46MM TRAILBLAZER ANGLED (MODEL# ASC-018-150) AND ASAHI ASTATO 30 WIRE. DOCTOR UPGRADED TO 0.035" STIFF ANGLED WIRE AND NAVICROSS. DOCTOR WAS UNABLE TO PASS THE CATHETER BEYOND DISTAL SFA AND WIRE/CATHETER WERE CHANGED TO 0.018" V-18 AND TRAILBLAZER WERE USED AS PART OF A SECOND ATTEMPT. DOCTOR CONTINUED TO HAVE DIFFICULT TIME, AND IT WAS DECIDED TO PERFORM AN ANGIOPLASTY OF THE ENTIRE SFA. THE WIRE APPEARED TO BE IN THE LUMEN AT THE POPLITEAL ARTERY. WHEN DOCTOR ADVANCED THE TRAILBLAZER, IT WAS DIFFICULT TO ADVANCE AND AFTER PUSHING THE WIRE, THE TRAILBLAZER KINKED. DOCTOR WAS UNABLE TO REMOVE THE WIRE AND HAD TO TAKE THE WHOLE THING OUT. HUB BROKE OFF DURING MANIPULATIONS. WIRES WOULD NOT SLIDE THROUGH CATHETER - FELT STICKY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 10860007 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 7, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    PHYSICIAN INTENDED TO USE A TRAILBLAZER SUPPORT CATHETER WITH A HAWKONE ATHERECTOMY DEVICE DURING TREATMENT OF A 250MM PLAQUE CTO (CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION-100%) IN THE PATIENT¿S PROXIMAL, MID, AND DISTAL RIGHT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). SLIGHT VESSEL TORTUOSITY AND MODERATE CALCIFICATION ARE REPORTED. ARTERY DIAMETER REPORTED AS 6MM. IFU WAS FOLLOWED. A 4FR SHEATH AND 0.018 NON-MEDTRONIC WIRE WERE USED WITH THE TRAILBLAZER SUPPORT CATHETER. THE CTO WAS CROSSED USING PEDAL ACCESS. AFTER CROSSING THE CTO AND ADVANCING THE 0.018 NON-MEDTRONIC WIRE THROUGH THE FEMORAL SHEATH, IT WAS OBSERVED THE TIP OF THE TRAILBLAZER HAD DETACHED. THE TIP REMAINED ON THE WIRE AND WAS REMOVED WITHOUT FURTHER INTERVENTION. NO RESISTANCE WAS FELT ADVANCING THE CATHETER OR WITHDRAWING IT. DURING USING THE HAWKONE DEVICE WITH A 7FR NON-MEDTRONIC SHEATH, AND 7FR SPIDER FX AFTER COMPLETION OF PRE-DILATION, IT IS REPORTED WIRE WRAP OCCURRED WHEN TRYING TO PULL THE DEVICE OUT OF THE SHEATH. THE WIRE WRAP WAS RESOLVED BUT THE DEVICE WAS STILL DIFFICULT TO REMOVE FROM THE SHEATH. UPON REMOVAL THE WIRE LUMEN OF THE HAWKONE DEVICE WAS PULLED OFF. THE WIRE LUMEN PEALED BACK OFF THE HAWK ABOUT 75 %.NO COMPONE

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10642178 ↗

Other Catheter, percutaneous devices

All Catheter, percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page