NanoCross™ Elite AB14W030150150 (UDI 00763000109868)Recalls & reported problems
Ev3, Inc · PTA AB14W030150150 NANOCROSS 014 V05 · Class 2
All models of NanoCross Elite (63)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000109868), received between Apr 9, 2020 and Feb 13, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (3 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K141118); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component3
- Difficult to Advance1
- Difficult to Remove1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 13, 2024Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component
PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO USE A NANOCROSS ELITE PTA BALLOON DURING TREATMENT OF A PLAQUE LESION IN THE PATIENTS PROXIMAL MID DISTAL SUP ERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). LITTLE VESSEL TORTUOSITY AND LITTLE VESSEL CALCIFICATION WERE REPORTED. LESION EXHIBITED 70% STENOSIS. THERE WERE NO ABNORMALITIES REPORTED IN RELATION TO ANATOMY. EMBOLIC PROTECTION WAS NOT USED. AN INFLATION DEVICE WAS USED FOR BAL LOON INFLATION. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO PACKAGING, I.E. SHELF CARTON, HOOP, TRAY. NO ISSUES WERE NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE HOOP, TRAY. THE IFU WAS FOLLOWED AND THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED WITHOUT ISSUE. NO RESISTANCE WAS NOTED DURING ADVANCEMENT OF THE DEVICE. EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS NOT USED. THE DEVICE WAS PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. IT WAS REPORTED THE BALLOON DETACHED FROM CATHETER WHEN PULLING PTA OUT POST INFLATION. DIFFICULTY REMOVING BALLOON FOLLOWING BALLOON INFLATION WAS ALSO REPORTED. THE DETACHED PORTION OF DEVICE DOES NOT REMAIN IN PATIENT. DEVICE WAS PULLED OUT AND PHYSICIAN REWIRED WITH NEW WIRE TO COMPLETE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18695066 ↗InjuryMay 11, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Advance; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Advance
A PHYSICIAN WAS USING A NANOCROSS PTA BALLOON FOR TREATMENT OF A CALCIFIED LESION WITH 90% STENOSIS IN THE PROXIMAL REGION OF THE SU PERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. THERE WAS MILD TORTUOSITY AND SEVERE CALCIFICATION. A 6FR SHEATH AND A NON MEDTRONIC GUIDEWIRE WERE USED. EMBOLIC PROTECTION WAS NOT USED. A NON-MEDTRONIC INFLATION DEVICE WAS USED. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED AS PER THE IFU WITH NO ISSUES IDENTIFIED. IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT HAD A CUTDOWN WITH ANTEGRADE ACCESS, AFTER INFLATION OF BALLOON, BALLOON WAS DEFLATED AND BEGAN TO BE REMOVED. HEARD A LOUD CRACK AND IT WAS NOTICED THE BALLOON HAD BROKEN AWAY FROM THE CATHETER. PATIENT HAD A CUTDOWN ALREADY FOR AN ENDART. DETACHMENT OCCURRED UPON WITHDRAWAL INTO SHEATH, REMOVED SHEATH AND BALLOON CATHETER. BITS OF THE BALLOON REMAINED ON THE WIRE. USED FORCEPS TO REMOVE BITS FROM WIRE. EXCHANGED WIRE AND CONTINUED PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE HAD PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT AND RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED DURING ADVANCEMENT. NO FURTHER PATIENT INJURY REPORTED FOR THIS EVENT
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16911243 ↗MalfunctionApr 9, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE USING NANOCROSS PTA BALLOON CATHETER, THE BALLOON PEELED AWAY FROM THE CATHETER WHILE IN THE PATIENT. IT STAYED ATTACHED TO CATHETER SO REMOVED AS NORMAL. NOTHING WAS LEFT BEHIND IN PATIENT. BALLOON WAS INFLATED USING A NON MEDTRONIC INDEFLATOR. DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER IFU WITH NO ISSUES IDENTIFIED. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT AND NO EXCESSIVE FORCE USED WHILE ADVANCING THE DEVICE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AS NORMAL. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9943734 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K141118. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0904-2025 · Dec 10, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedMedtronic NanoCross Elite PTA catheter, REF numbers amd sizes: 1) AB14W050020090, Size: 5MM X 20MM X 90CM; 2) AB14W050020150, Size: 5MM X 20MM X 150CM; 3) AB14W050040090,
Other Catheter, percutaneous devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page