Anteralign Spinal System with Titan nanoLock Surface technology 46261050Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · NANO SPACER 46261050 T 6DG 20W 10X7.9X50 · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000128487), received between Aug 14, 2023 and Sep 12, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Migration3
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 12, 2024Migration; Migration
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING AN EVENT WHICH OCCURRED DURING L 3/4 OLIF PROCEDURE IN A PATIENT DIAGNOSED WITH L3/4/5 LCS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE OPERATION WAS PERFORMED IN THE FIRST PERIOD, IN WHICH THE OLIF 2 INTERVERTEBRAL AND POSTERIOR FUSIONS WERE DIVIDED INTO TWO PERIODS. THE FIRST TERM WAS COMPLETED BY INSERTING A CAGE, PLATE <(>&<)> SCREW BETWEEN THE 2 INTERVERTEBRAL OF L3/4/5. THE SECOND PERIOD OF POSTERIOR FIXATION WAS PERFORMED WITH NON-MEDTRONIC HARDWARE. BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND PERIOD, ABOUT ONE-THIRD OF THE L3/4 CAGE CAME OFF IN ONE WEEK. THE CAGE THAT HAD COME LOOSE WAS TO BE DRIVEN IN AGAIN, SO ONLY THE SCREWS IN THE PLATE WERE REMOVED, THE PLATE AND CAGE WERE DRIVEN IN AS THEY WERE, FITTED BETWEEN THE VERTEBRAE, AND FINISHED AFTER COMPRESSION WAS APPLIED AT THE TIME OF POSTERIOR FIXATION. THERE WAS A DELAY OF LESS THAN 60 MINS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOM REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20203416 ↗InjuryAug 14, 2023Migration; Migration
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WITH PRE-OPERATIVE DIA GNOSIS FOR DISC DEGENERATIVE DISEASE. PROCEDURE PERFORMED WAS PRONE OLIF THERAPY. LEVELS IMPLANTED L2-3-4-5. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON WAS UNABLE TO TO INSERT AN ANTERALIGN PLATE ON THE CAGE AT ANY OF THE 3 LEVELS, COULD NOT GET THE PLATE TO ENGAGE AND ATTACH TO THE CAGE L3-4 CAGE BACKED OUT AND WAS NOTICED ON (B)(6) NOTICED ON POST OP CT FOR MAZOR STAGE SURGERY ON (B)(6) ENDED UP REVISING INCISION AND REPOSITIONED CAGE THEN DID AN L2-S2 POSTERIOR FUSION THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. ORIGINAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023 WITH 3 CAGES IMPLANTED AND 3 PLATES IMPLANTED AND EXPLANTED ON THIS DATE. ONE OF THE THREE CAGES HAD SHIFTED ON (B)(6) 2023. ON (B)(6) 2023, SECOND SURGERY WAS PERFORMED TO REPOSITION THE CAGE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17538673 ↗InjuryAug 14, 2023Migration; Migration
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WITH PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS FOR DISC DEGENERATIVE DISEASE. PROCEDURE PERFORMED WAS PRONE OLIF THERAPY. LEVELS IMPLANTED L2-3-4-5. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON WAS UNABLE TO TO INSERT AN ANTERALIGN PLATE ON THE CAGE AT ANY OF THE 3 LEVELS, COULD NOT GET THE PLATE TO ENGAGE AND ATTACH TO THE CAGE L3-4 CAGE BACKED OUT AND WAS NOTICED ON (B)(6) NOTICED ON POST OP CT FOR MAZOR STAGE SURGERY ON (B)(6) ENDED UP REVISING INCISION AND REPOSITIONED CAGE THEN DID AN L2-S2 POSTERIOR FUSION THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. ORIGINAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023 WITH 3 CAGES IMPLANTED AND 3 PLATES IMPLANTED AND EXPLANTED ON THIS DATE. ONE OF THE THREE CAGES HAD SHIFTED ON (B)(6) 2023. ON (B)(6) 2023, SECOND SURGERY WAS PERFORMED TO REPOSITION THE CAGE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17538642 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices
- T-PAL 03.812.003Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar152 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.004Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar120 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068073Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall66 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall51 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall46 reports
- EIT TLIF Inserter TFT30101EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar88 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.001Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar76 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069096Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page