Skip to content

EverCross™ AB35W10040080 (UDI 00763000185008)Recalls & reported problems

Ev3, Inc · PTA AB35W10040080 EVERCROSS 035 V09 · Class 2

All models of EverCross (114)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000185008), received between Jul 1, 2019 and Dec 1, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Patient Problem/Medical Problem1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 1, 2023Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO USE AN EVERCROSS PTA BALLOON DURING PATIENT TREATMENT. THERE WERE NO ABNORMALITIES REPORTED IN RELATION TO ANATOMY. THE IFU WAS FOLLOWED AND THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED WITHOUT ISSUE. A BALLOON BURST WAS REPORTED. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18246494 ↗
  • InjuryJul 1, 2019Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN WAS USING AN EVERCROSS PTA BALLOON TO TREAT A MODERATELY CALCIFIED, MODERATELY TORTUOUS, FIBROUS LESION IN THE MID RIGHT SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO THE PACKAGING AND THERE WERE NO ISSUES NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE TRAY/HOOP. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED WITHOUT ISSUE. A 7FR NON-MEDTRONIC SHEATH WAS USED WITH NO EMBOLIC PROTECTION. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT, NO RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED NOR EXCESSIVE FORCE USED ON ADVANCING THE DEVICE TO THE TARGET LESION. THE DEVICE WAS INFLATED TO 8ATM USING AN INFLATION DEVICE AND A MIX OF SALINE/CONTRAST AS INFLATION FLUID. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON BURST ON THE FIRST INFLATION AND FRAGMENTED. PART OF THE BALLOON REMAINED IN THE PATIENTS ARTERY SO, AN 8X80X80 STENT WAS USED TO CAGE IT AGAINST THE VESSEL WALL. A NEW BALLOON WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Patient Problem/Medical Problem

    MAUDE report 8748332 ↗

Other Catheter, percutaneous devices

All Catheter, percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page