Adaptix™ Interbody System with Titan nanoLOCK™ Surface Technology 84332410Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · SPACER 84332410 ADAPTIX 24MM X 10MM · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 7
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000202897), received between Jun 7, 2021 and Feb 3, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (7 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Migration7
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Pain1
- Unspecified Nervous System Problem1
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 3, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WITH CLINICAL ID (B)(6), STUDY ID (B)(6) AND INCIDENT TYPE AE, SUBEVENT NUMBER: 0. PRIMARY DIAGNOSIS: STENOSIS. DESCRIPTION: INCREASED BACK PAIN. ONSET DATE: 2025-04-01. OUTCOME STATUS: NOT RECOVERED/ NOT RESOLVED. INTERVENTIONS: ACTION. SUBTYPE: AE RESULT IN HOSPITALIZATION, ACTION RESULT: NO ACTION. SUBTYPE: ANU. OTHER ACTION(S) TAKEN, ACTION RESULT: NO ACTION. SUBTYPE: DID THE AE RESULT IN ANY TREATMENT, ACTION RESULT: NO. SITE SERIOUSNESS ASSESSMENT: THERE IS NO CONGENITAL ANOMALY, DEATH, DISABILITY, HOSPITALIZATION, LIFE THREATENING AND MEDICAL INTERVENTION. SPONSOR ASSESSMENT: CAUSAL RELATED TO PROCEDURE AND NOT RELATED TO ANY DEVICE. DIAGNOSTICS: ACTION TYPE: DIAGNOSTIC ACTION SUBTYPE: MRI WITHOUT CONTRAST1 ACTION TYPE: DIAGNOSTIC ACTION SUBTYPE: WERE ANY DIAGNOSTIC TEST PERFORMED. ACTION RESULT: YES. EVENT: IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT RETURNS TO OFFICE "WITH RECURRENT BACK AND RIGHT LEG PAIN OF UNCERTAIN ETIOLOGY AND PLAN IS TO GET LUMBAR MRI. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT PATIENT OUTCOME: RECOVERING/RESOLVING SITE SERIOUS ASSESSMENT: SEVERITY OF ADVERSE EVENT I
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Pain
MAUDE report 24243879 ↗InjuryFeb 18, 2025Migration; Migration
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING MIS TLIF USING VOYAGER AND ADAPTIX IN CONJUNCTION WITH OARM & S8 NAVIGATION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAGE WAS SHOWN TO HAVE COMPLETELY MIGRATED OUT OF THE DISC SPACE. LEVELS IMPLANTED AT L5/S1. PATIENT WAS READMITTED FOR REVISION SURGERY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE DEVICE WAS NOT DELIVERED AS A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT AND THERE IS NO MANUFACTURING ISSUES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21402220 ↗InjuryDec 3, 2024Migration; Migration
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT UNDERGOING L2/3 PLIF S PINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE RIGHT PEDICLE OF L2 HAD FRACTURED, RESULTING IN INSTABILITY AND BACKOUT OF THE CAGE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOM REPORTED. THERE IS A DELAY OF GREATER THAN 60 MINUTES IN THE OVERALL PROCEDURE TIME.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20830464 ↗InjurySep 25, 2023Migration; Migration
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WITH MEDICAL HISTORY OF ANTERIOR LUMBAR FUSION AT L2/4 30 YEARS AGO WITH INTERBODY IMPLANT. PROCEDURE PERFORMED WAS FUSED RANGE EXTENSION, PS REPLACEMENT, AND CAGE REINSERTION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT DEVELOPED NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS DUE TO CAGE BACKOUT USED IN L4/5 TLIF AS A RESULT OF LOOSENING OF PEDICLE SCREW (PS) IN S. THIS SURGERY IS A REPEATED SURGERY. DATE OF INITIAL SURGERY WAS (B)(6), 2023. ADDITIONAL SURGERY PERFORMED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. PS REPLACEMENT, FUSED RANGE EXTENSION AND CAGE REINSERTION. ALSO, THE LOOSENESS OF THE PEDICLE SCREW INSERTED IN S.
Patient problems: Unspecified Nervous System Problem
MAUDE report 17805493 ↗InjuryAug 29, 2023Migration; Migration
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WITH PLIF THERAPY. LE VEL AT WHICH IMPLANT PERFORMED WAS L4-S. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAGE BACKED OUT. THE ADDITIONAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED. AFTER IT WAS REMOVED ONCE, THEN INSERTED THE SAME ON (B)(6), 2023. WHICH CAGE CAME OFF AND INSERTED INTO THE RIGHT SIDE IS UNKNOWN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17639175 ↗InjuryAug 29, 2023Migration; Migration
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WITH PLIF THERAPY. LE VEL AT WHICH IMPLANT PERFORMED WAS L4-S. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAGE BACKED OUT. THE ADDITIONAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED. AFTER IT WAS REMOVED ONCE, THEN INSERTED THE SAME ON (B)(6) 2023. WHICH CAGE CAME OFF AND INSERTED INTO THE RIGHT SIDE IS UNKNOWN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17639168 ↗InjuryAug 4, 2021Migration; Migration
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING TLIF AT L5-S1 S PINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAGE SUBSIDED POSTERIORLY AND REMOVED POSTERIORLY. PATIENT IS STABLE. PATIENT HAD CAGE REMOVED POSTERIORLY AND THEN UNDER WENT AN OLIF AT THAT LEVEL TO REPLACE THE TLIF CAGE. A REVISION SURGERY WAS NEEDED FOR THIS SURGERY, SURGEON TOOK CAGE OUT AND PERFORMED AN ALIF ON THIS PATIENT. FIRST CAGE SUBSIDED ON (B)(6) 2021. SECOND CAGE SUBSIDED ON (B)(6) 2021. THERE WAS NO PATIENT COMPLICATION/ SYMPTOMS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12272758 ↗MalfunctionJun 7, 2021Migration; Migration
THE INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTH CARE PROVIDER VIA A MANUFACTURING REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WITH INTERBODY FUSION WITH ADAPTIX CAGE FOR SPINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT POST OP THE CAGE MIGRATE TO POSTERIOR. THE SURGERY WENT WELL. THERE WAS NO TREATMENT OR ADDITIONAL SURGERY PERFORMED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11945099 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices
- T-PAL 03.812.003Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar152 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.004Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar120 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068073Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall66 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall51 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall46 reports
- EIT TLIF Inserter TFT30101EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar88 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.001Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar76 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069096Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page