Skip to content

Adaptix™ Interbody System with Titan nanoLOCK™ Surface Technology 84332412Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · SPACER 84332412 ADAPTIX 24MM X 12MM · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000202910), received between Nov 29, 2021 and Feb 12, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Migration2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • Pain3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 12, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A DEVICE USED FOR SPINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAGE BECAME DISLOCATED, RESULTING IN PAIN SYMPTOMS. THE PATIENT RETURNED DUE TO A DISLOCATION OF THE ADAPTIX CAGE, AND AN ADDITIONAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED TO RELOCATE THE ADAPTIX CAGE AT THE L4-L5 LEVEL. NO ADDITIONAL COMPLICATIONS RELATED TO THE EVENT WERE REPORTED. THE IMPLANT WAS NOT REMOVED; INSTEAD, THE L4-L5 CAGE WAS RELOCATED AND THE BILATERAL L4 SCREWS WERE UPSIZED. NO THERAPY WAS ADMINISTERED DURING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 24329565 ↗
  • InjurySep 13, 2022Migration; Migration

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING PRE-OP DIAGNOSIS FOR HARDWARE REMOVAL OF FAILED TLIF AT L5/S1. PROCEDURE OR TECHNIQUE USED WAS L3-S1 TLIF AND POSTERIOR LUMBAR FUSION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAGE BACKED OUT OF THE DISC SPACE. PATIENT HAD BACK PAIN. ADDITIONAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED FOR REMOVAL OF THE EXTRUDED CAGE AT L5/S1.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 15408367 ↗
  • InjuryNov 29, 2021Migration; Migration

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WITH PRE-OP DIAGNOSIS FOR MISTLIF THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAGE BACK OUT. PATIENT HAD LOWER BACK PAIN SINCE 15TH DAYS RADIATING TO LOWER LIMB. R>L. CT SCAN SHOWED DISPLACED FUSION DEVICE AT L5 S1 LEVEL CAUSING STENOSIS AFTER THE 1ST SURGERY. REVISION CASE DONE ON (B)(6) 2021. AND THE CAGE WAS EXPLANTED BY OPEN REVISION SURGERY. THE CAGE WAS REPLACED BY PATIENT AUTOGRAFT ONLY. NO CAGE WAS IMPLANTED AGAIN. AFTER THE REVISION SURGERY PATIENT IS OK.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 12888830 ↗

Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices

All Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page