N/A 9734904Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · INST KIT 9734904 INTERBODY INSERTER · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000208776), received between Mar 6, 2020 and Apr 25, 2025 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Integrity Problem” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Integrity Problem3
- Material Fragmentation2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 25, 2025Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING A NAVIGATION SYSTEM BEING USED DURING A SACROILIAC AND THORACOLUMBAR PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BACK PORTION OF THE INSERTER'S LOCKING INNER PIECE BROKE OFF WHEN MALLEATING IN THE INTERBODY CAGE. PATIENT PRESENT. UNKNOWN DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21911329 ↗MalfunctionNov 20, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THAT THE INSTRUMENT BROKE OFF INSIDE OF THE PATIENT ANATOMY. ALL BROKEN PIECES WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18172448 ↗MalfunctionFeb 24, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING A NAVIGATION SYSTEM BEING USED IN A SACROILIAC AND THORACOLUMBAR PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRE-OPERATIVELY THE PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH DEGENERATIVE SCOLIOSIS. AFTER INSERTING THE CAGE TO THE L2/3 LEVEL, THE INSERTER WAS REATTACHED FOR ADDITIONAL INSERTION AND THE INSERTION WAS ATTEMPTED. BUT IT DID NOT MOVE AND THE CAGE BROKE FROM THE ATTACHMENT PART WHEN HIT WITH A HAMMER. THE BROKEN PARTS WERE COLLECTED AND DISCARDED DUE TO BLOOD CONTAMINATION. THE CAGE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT AND WAS LEFT AS IT WAS. THERE WAS NO REPORTED IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THAT THERE WAS NO PLAN FROM THE SITE THAT A REVISION PROCEDURE WOULD BE PERFORMED. THE FRAGMENT PIECES REMAINED AT THE IMPLANT LEVEL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13592284 ↗MalfunctionFeb 9, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING A NAVIGATION SYSTEM BEING USED IN A SACROILIAC AND THORACOLUMBAR PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRE-OPERATIVELY THE PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH DEGENERATIVE SCOLIOSIS. AFTER INSERTING THE CAGE TO THE L2/3 LEVEL, THE INSERTER WAS REATTACHED FOR ADDITIONAL INSERTION AND THE INSERTION WAS ATTEMPTED. BUT IT DID NOT MOVE AND THE CAGE BROKE FROM THE ATTACHMENT PART WHEN HIT WITH A HAMMER. THE BROKEN PARTS WERE COLLECTED AND DISCARDED DUE TO BLOOD CONTAMINATION. THE CAGE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT AND WAS LEFT AS IT WAS. THERE WAS NO REPORTED IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THAT THERE WAS NO PLAN FROM THE SITE THAT A REVISION PROCEDURE WOULD BE PERFORMED. THE FRAGMENT PIECES REMAINED AT THE IMPLANT LEVEL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13497214 ↗MalfunctionMar 6, 2020Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING A NAVIGATION SYSTEM. IT WAS REPORTED OUTSIDE OF A PROCEDURE THAT THE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION (TLIF) INSERTER WAS DEFECTIVE. NO PATIENT WAS PRESENT AT THE TIME OF THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 9800564 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices
- T-PAL 03.812.003Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar152 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.004Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar120 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068073Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall66 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall51 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall46 reports
- EIT TLIF Inserter TFT30101EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar88 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.001Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar76 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069096Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page