Skip to content

AMPLATZ GOOSE NECK™ SK400Recalls & reported problems

Ev3, Inc · SNARE SK400 MICRO SNARE V01 · Class 2

All models of AMPLATZ GOOSE NECK (10)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00763000225391), received between Nov 18, 2024 and Nov 18, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Damaged by Another Device” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Damaged by Another Device1
  • Difficult to Remove1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 18, 2024Difficult to Remove; Device Damaged by Another Device; Difficult to Remove; Device Damaged by Another Device

    A PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING TO USE A NON-MEDTRONIC (ABBOTT) STENT TO TREAT A PATIENT. THE VESSEL WAS PRE AND POST DILATED. THE IFU (INSTRUCTION FOR USE) WAS FOLLOWED DURING PREPARATION, PROCEDURE, POST-PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE DID PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. NO RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE. REMOVAL DIFFICULTIES WAS REPORTED, A SNARE WAS STUCK ON A STENT IN THE PATIENT, IT BROKE SO THE LOOP PORTION IS TACKED AGAINST THE VESSEL WALL WITH A VBX. TO REMOVE, PULLED WITH RESISTANCE, REMOVED SUCCESSFULLY IN TANDEM WITHOUT INJURY/INTERVENTION. NO VESSEL DAMAGE REPORTED. PROCEDURE ABORTED, NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20707225 ↗

Other Catheter, percutaneous devices

All Catheter, percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page