Skip to content

Solitaire™ X SFR4-3-40-10Recalls & reported problems

Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · STENT SFR4-3-40-10 V01 3X40 · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000367626), received between Apr 10, 2023 and Aug 11, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Material Deformation1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 11, 2025Material Deformation; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Material Deformation; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING TREATMENT FOR M1D ISCHEMIC CEREBRAL INFARCTION. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT'S BLOOD VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS STRONG. THE THROMBOLYSIS IN CEREBRAL INFARCTION (TICI) SCORE BASELINE WAS UNKNOWN AND AFTER THE PROCEDURE WAS 2B. INTRAVENOUS TPA WAS NOT CONTRAINDICATED, AND NOTABLY, THERE WERE ZERO PASSES WITH THE DEVICE DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE TIME REQUIRED FROM ONSET OF CEREBRAL INFARCTION TO REVASCULARIZATION/REVASCULARIZE WAS 120 MINUTES IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER INDUCTION INTO M1D AFTER A MICROCATHETER, SOLITAIRE FR 3-40 WAS INSERTED INTO TREVOTRAK 21 MICROCATHETER. WHEN THE SOLITAIRE WAS INSERTED IN ABOUT TWO-THIRDS, THERE WAS A STRONG RESISTANCE IN THE CENTER OF THE CATHETER, BUT IT WAS STILL INSERTED. IT BECAME DIFFICULT TO INSERT THE STENT AFTERWARDS, SO THE STENT WAS REMOVED. UPON CHECKING THE STENT, KINKS WERE OBSERVED AT THE STENT JUNCTION. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. ANCILLARY DEVICES INCLUDE A CHIKAI14 GUIDE WIRE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22770612 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 10, 2023Break; Break

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE STENT PACKAGE WAS OPENED AND THE STENT WAS HYDRATED. A REBAR18 WAS USED TO DELIVER THE STENT. AFTER THE STENT WAS IN PLACE, IT WAS DEPLOYED AND PULLED BACK, BUT THE STENT BROKE. IT WAS UNKNOWN IF ANY PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16706721 ↗

Other CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER devices

All CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page