Skip to content

Pipeline TM Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology TM PED2-475-16Recalls & reported problems

Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · STENT PED2-475-16 V08 MDR · Class 3 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000449452), received between Jan 12, 2026 and Sep 23, 2026 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (5 reports).

12 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P100018); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 2 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Activation Failure5
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 23, 2026Activation Failure

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50869853 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 15, 2026Activation Failure

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE PIPELINE STENT TIP FAILED TO OPEN. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF A SACCULAR, RUPTURED INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY C7 SEGMENT ANEURYSM. IT HAD A MAX DIAMETER OF 2.5 MM AND A 2 MM NECK DIAMETER. THE LANDING ZONE WAS 1.79 MM DISTALLY AND 5.39 MM PROXIMALLY. THE ACCESS VESSEL WAS THE FEMORAL ARTERYWITH A DIAMETER OF 8 MM. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS SEVERE. DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY (DAPT) WAS ADMINISTERED AT AN UNKNOWN PLATELET REACTIVITY UNITS (PRU) LEVEL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON SUSPECTED THE ANEURYSM TO BE A BLISTER-LIKE, AND PLANNED TO PERFORM TREATMENT USING COIL EMBOLIZATION ASSISTED BY A DENSE-MESH STENT. THE SURGEON UTILIZED A NON-MEDTRONIC STENT MICROCATHETER TO DEPLOY THE STENT. AFTER POSITIONING THE STENT MICROCATHETER IN THE M2 SEGMENT AND THE ECHELON-14 MICROCATHETER IN PLACE, IT WAS DELIVERED AND EMBOLIZATION OF THE ANEURYSM WAS PERFORMED. A PIPELINE (PED 4.75-16) STENT WAS THEN DELIVERED TO THE STRAIGHT SEGMENT OF M1. WHEN WITHDRAWING THE MICROCATHETER, THE STENT'S TIP WAS EXPOSED APPROXIMATELY 5 MM; UPON ATTEMPTING TO ADVANCE THE DELIVERY ROD¿MOVING IT FORWARD BY ABOUT 15 MM¿THE STENT

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24885254 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 24, 2026Activation Failure

    ANY CAUSES OR CONTRIBUTING FACTORS FOR THE FAILURE TO OPEN DISTALLY ARE UNKNOWN. ANY CAUSES OR CONTRIBUTING FACTORS FOR THE FAILURE TO OPEN IN THE MIDDLE SECTION ARE ALSO UNKNOWN. MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO RESHEATH, BUT IT STILL COULD NOT FULLY OPEN.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24680213 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 20, 2026Activation Failure

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED. THE CAUSE WAS UNDETERMINED. THE PHYSICIAN SUSPECTED ANATOMY AND RECAPTURE CONTRIBUTED TO THE DISTAL PORTION NOT OPENING.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24123219 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 12, 2026Material Deformation; Activation Failure

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT A PIPELINE FLEX WITH SHIELD TECHNOLOGY STENT (PED2) WAS DEPLOYED AT THE LANDING ZONE, HOWEVER, THE DISTAL END WOULDN'T OPEN. THE STENT WAS RECAPTURED AND THE SYSTEM WAS ADVANCED UP MORE DISTALLY INTO THE M1 SEGMENT AND DEPLOYMENT WAS ATTEMPTED AGAIN BUT THE DEVICE WAS STILL NOT OPENING. THE DEVICE LOOKED IRREGULAR UNDER FLUOROSCOPIC IMAGING AND THE PHYSICIAN OPTED TO RESHEATH THE DEVICE AND REMOVE IT FROM THE PATIENT WITH THE MICROCATHETER. ONCE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND LAID ON THE BACK TABLE, THE DEVICE LOOKED PINCHED ON THE DISTAL END. THE STENT WAS REPLACED WITH A DIFFERENT SIZE PED2 TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING DENSE MESH FLOW DIVERSION SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF AN UNRUPTURED, SACCULAR, RIGHT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA) ANEURYSM. THE LANDING ZONE ARTERIAL DIAMETER WAS 3.37 MM DISTALLY AND 4.7 MM PROXIMALLY. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS MODERATE. DUAL ANTIPLATELET TREATMENT (DAPT) WAS ADMINISTERED. THE ANGIOGRAPHIC RESULT POST PROCEDURE SHOWED SUCCESSFUL IMPLANT OF THE REPLACEMENT DEVICE. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24043523 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under P100018. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1246-2025 · Jan 30, 2025 · Open, Classified
    Medtronic Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device with Shield Technology, REF: PED3-021-350-16, PED3-021-250-14, PED3-021-350-20, PED3-021-250-20, PED3-021-300-16, PED3-021-300-20, PE
  • Z-1245-2025 · Jan 30, 2025 · Open, Classified
    Medtronic Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device with Shield Technology, REF: PED3-027-350-12, PED3-027-350-14, PED3-027-350-16, PED3-027-350-20, PED3-027-350-25, PED3-027-400-12, PE
  • Z-2402-2021 · Jul 13, 2021 · Open, Classified
    Pipeline Flex Embolization Device
  • Z-2403-2021 · Jul 13, 2021 · Open, Classified
    EV3 Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Flex Shield Technology
  • Z-1527-2020 · Feb 14, 2020 · Terminated
    ev3 Pipeline Flex Embolization Device. For neurological endovascular use.
  • Z-0309-2017 · Oct 5, 2016 · Terminated
    Marathon Flow Directed Micro Catheter, UltraFlow HPC Flow Directed Micro Catheter Marathon Flow: The device is intended to access periphera and neurovasculature for the controlled
  • Z-0307-2017 · Oct 5, 2016 · Terminated
    Pipeline Embolization Device (Pipeline Classic) The device is indicated for the endovascular treatment of adults (22 year of age or older) with large or giant widenecked intracrani
  • Z-0310-2017 · Oct 5, 2016 · Terminated
    X-Celerator Hydrophilic Exchange Guidewire Catalog No. 103-0601-300 103-0601-350V10 103-0602-350V06 103-0601-300V01 103-0602-300 103-0602-350V09 103-0601-300V02 103-0602-300V01 10
  • Z-0308-2017 · Oct 5, 2016 · Terminated
    Alligator Retrieval Device The device is intended for use in the peripheral and neurovasculature for foreign body removal. Catalog No. FA-88810-20V04 FA-88810-20V06 FA-88810-30V04
  • Z-0120-2016 · Sep 4, 2015 · Terminated
    -Pipeline Embolization Device -Pipeline Flex Embolization Device The Pipeline and Pipeline Flex Embolization Devices consist of a permanent implant combined with a guidewire based
  • Z-1453-2014 · Apr 1, 2014 · Terminated
    Pipeline Embolization Device (PED). Used endovascular treatment of adults with intracranial aneurysms in the internal carotid artery.
  • Z-2045-2013 · Jul 19, 2013 · Terminated
    Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) The Pipeline Embolization Device is indicated for the endovascular treatment of adults (22 years of age and older) with large or giant wide-neck

Other Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices

All Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page