Skip to content

Pipeline TM Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology TM PED2-500-25Recalls & reported problems

Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · STENT PED2-500-25 V08 MDR · Class 3 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000449575), received between Dec 5, 2025 and Sep 11, 2026 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (4 reports).

12 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P100018); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Activation Failure4
  • Material Deformation2
  • Material Frayed1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 11, 2026Activation Failure

    Medtronic received a report of Pipeline failure to open in the middle section. The patient was undergoing surgery for treatment of a saccular, unruptured, tandem aneurysm in the C6 and C7 segments of the internal carotid artery. It had a max diameter of 5 mm and a 4 mm neck diameter. The landing zone was 3.2 mm distally and 5. 1 mm proximally. It was noted the patient's vessel tortuosity was moderate. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was administered. The angiographic result post procedure showed flow-diverting stent implantation for internal carotid artery aneurysm It was reported that during treatment, a Pipeline PED2-500-25 was used. The tip of the stent was successfully opened and positioned in the middle cerebral artery. During continued deployment, when the stent had opened to the midsection, it failed to expand. Multiple attempts to push and manipulate the device were made, but the stent still did not open. Deployment was then continued, and it was also able to open near the terminal segment; however, the midsection still could not open. It was therefore replaced with a PED2-500-20. The Pipeline was not used for an indication that is not approved (off-label). The Pipeline an

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50734992 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 26, 2026Material Deformation; Activation Failure

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50457073 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 24, 2026Activation Failure

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT A PIPELINE ENCOUNTERED RESISTANCE AND FAILED TO OPEN THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF A SACCULAR, UNRUPTURED FLOW DIVERSION THERAPY ANEURYSM LOCATED ON THE OPHTHALMIC ARTERY SEGMENT WITH A MAX DIAMETER OF 12MM AND A 7MM NECK DIAMETER. THE LANDING ZONE WAS 4.2MM DISTALLY AND 5.1MM PROXIMALLY. ACCESS VESSEL WAS THE FEMORAL ARTERY AND IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS SEVERE. DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY (DAPT) WAS ADMINISTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE. ANGIOGRAPHIC RESULT POST PROCEDURE SHOWED THAT THERE WAS OBVIOUS CONTRAST RETENTION WITHIN THE ANEURYSM, WITH NO VESSEL LOSS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SPECIFIC SITUATION WAS THAT THE ANEURYSM WAS RELATIVELY LARGE AND THE VESSEL WAS HIGHLY TORTUOUS, SO THE CUSTOMER SPENT A LONG TIME ESTABLISHING ACCESS. AFTER THE MICROCATHETER WAS POSITIONED, IT REACHED TO THE M1-M2 BEND, AND STENT DELIVERY WAS INITIATED. THE INITIALLY SELECTED STENT WAS A PED2-500-20. THE CUSTOMER STARTED STENT DELIVERY, AND REPORTED SIGNIFICANT RESISTANCE DURING DELIVERY. AFTER SUCCESSFUL POSITIONING, STENT DEPLOYMENT WAS STARTED. WITH THE STENT LOCATED IN THE STRAIGHT SEGMENT OF M1, THE CUSTOMER BEGAN WITHDR

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24982224 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 5, 2025Material Frayed; Material Deformation; Activation Failure; Material Frayed; Material Deformation; Activation Failure

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE DURING DELIVERY OR POSITIONING OF THE PIPELINE. THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE TO OPEN WAS NOT DETERMINED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23728521 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under P100018. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1246-2025 · Jan 30, 2025 · Open, Classified
    Medtronic Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device with Shield Technology, REF: PED3-021-350-16, PED3-021-250-14, PED3-021-350-20, PED3-021-250-20, PED3-021-300-16, PED3-021-300-20, PE
  • Z-1245-2025 · Jan 30, 2025 · Open, Classified
    Medtronic Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device with Shield Technology, REF: PED3-027-350-12, PED3-027-350-14, PED3-027-350-16, PED3-027-350-20, PED3-027-350-25, PED3-027-400-12, PE
  • Z-2402-2021 · Jul 13, 2021 · Open, Classified
    Pipeline Flex Embolization Device
  • Z-2403-2021 · Jul 13, 2021 · Open, Classified
    EV3 Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Flex Shield Technology
  • Z-1527-2020 · Feb 14, 2020 · Terminated
    ev3 Pipeline Flex Embolization Device. For neurological endovascular use.
  • Z-0309-2017 · Oct 5, 2016 · Terminated
    Marathon Flow Directed Micro Catheter, UltraFlow HPC Flow Directed Micro Catheter Marathon Flow: The device is intended to access periphera and neurovasculature for the controlled
  • Z-0310-2017 · Oct 5, 2016 · Terminated
    X-Celerator Hydrophilic Exchange Guidewire Catalog No. 103-0601-300 103-0601-350V10 103-0602-350V06 103-0601-300V01 103-0602-300 103-0602-350V09 103-0601-300V02 103-0602-300V01 10
  • Z-0307-2017 · Oct 5, 2016 · Terminated
    Pipeline Embolization Device (Pipeline Classic) The device is indicated for the endovascular treatment of adults (22 year of age or older) with large or giant widenecked intracrani
  • Z-0308-2017 · Oct 5, 2016 · Terminated
    Alligator Retrieval Device The device is intended for use in the peripheral and neurovasculature for foreign body removal. Catalog No. FA-88810-20V04 FA-88810-20V06 FA-88810-30V04
  • Z-0120-2016 · Sep 4, 2015 · Terminated
    -Pipeline Embolization Device -Pipeline Flex Embolization Device The Pipeline and Pipeline Flex Embolization Devices consist of a permanent implant combined with a guidewire based
  • Z-1453-2014 · Apr 1, 2014 · Terminated
    Pipeline Embolization Device (PED). Used endovascular treatment of adults with intracranial aneurysms in the internal carotid artery.
  • Z-2045-2013 · Jul 19, 2013 · Terminated
    Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) The Pipeline Embolization Device is indicated for the endovascular treatment of adults (22 years of age and older) with large or giant wide-neck

Other Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices

All Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page