Skip to content

Onyx Frontier™ ONYXNG40030UXRecalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · STENT ONYXNG40030UX ONYX 4.00X30RX · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Onyx Frontier (71)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000511692), received between Jul 29, 2022 and Feb 11, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Deformation4
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 11, 2026Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING ONE ONYX FRONTIER CORONARY DRUG ELUTING STENT, STENT DEFORMATION OCCURRED IN VIVO DURING POSITIONING/ADVANCEMENT. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MID CIRCUMFLEX (CX) ARTERY WHICH EXHIBITED MILD TORTUOSITY, MODERATE CALCIFICATION AND 70% STENOSIS. THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED WITH NO ISSUES NOTED. NEGATIVE PREP WAS NOT PERFORMED. THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. RESISTANCE WAS NOTED WHILE ADVANCING THE DEVICE. EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS NOT KINKED AND RESTRAIGHTENED DURING USE. IT WAS ATTEMPTED TO PUSH THE DEVICE THROUGH SIGNIFICANT PLAQUE BURDEN OF 80%. THE VESSEL WAS CALCIFIED IN THE OSTIAL SECTION OF THE VESSEL BUT THIS WAS NOT TREATED, THE STENT FRACTURED DURING DELIVERY THROUGH THE VESSEL BUT WAS NOT DEPLOYED. THE ENTIRE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE BODY WITH DEFORMATION/CRACKING TO THE STENT CELLS. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24313758 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 15, 2024Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO USE ONE ONYX FRONTIER CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT TO TREAT A LESION. THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED WITH NO ISSUES NOTED. NEGATIVE PREP WAS NOT PERFORMED. THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. RESISTANCE WAS NOT NOTED WHILE ADVANCING THE DEVICE. EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS NOT USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT DEFORMATION OCCURRED IN VIVO DURING POSITIONING/ADVANCEMENT. IT WAS DETAILED THAT WHEN THE STENT REACHED THE LESION SOMETHING FELT FUNNY. IT WAS DECIDED TO STOP AND RETRIEVE THE STENT. IT WAS NOTED THAT A STENT/SPUR MALFORMATION HAD OCCURRED. THE STENT WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER SAME SIZE ONYX FRONTIER STENT HOWEVER, A NON-MEDTRONIC GUIDE EXTENSION CATHETER (GEC) WAS USED TO DELIVERY THE STENT TO THE LESION. THE ONYX FRONTIER STENT WAS EXPANDED WITH NO ISSUES. THE PATIENT IS ALIVE WITH NO INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19110627 ↗
  • InjuryJun 12, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Material Deformation; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Material Deformation

    AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO USE ONE ONYX FRONTIER CORONARY DRUG ELUTING STENT TO TREAT A SEVERELY TORTUOUS, SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION WITH 90% STENOSIS IN THE MID RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED WITH NO ISSUES NOTED. NEGATIVE PREP WAS NOT PERFORMED. THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE. EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS USED DURING DELIVERY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT DISLODGEMENT OCCURRED DURING DELIVERY TO/AT THE LESION. THE DISLODGED STENT WAS REMOVED USING A SNARE. THE PATIENT IS ALIVE WITH NO FURTHER INJURY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17105016 ↗
  • InjuryJul 29, 2022Migration or Expulsion of Device; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Material Deformation; Migration or Expulsion of Device; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Material Deformation

    AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO USE ONE ONYX FRONTIER RX CORONARY DRUG ELUTING STENT TO TREAT A SEVERELY TORTUOUS, SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION EXHIBITING 90% MID-DISTAL STENOSIS LOCATED IN THE OSTIUM OF THE SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFT (SVG). THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED WITH NO ISSUES NOTED. NEGATIVE PREP WAS PERFORMED WITH NO ISSUES NOTED. THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY-DEPLOYED STENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT DISLODGEMENT IN VIVO OCCURRED DURING DELIVERY TO THE LESION. IT WAS STATED THAT THE STENT CAME OFF THE BALLOON AND IT WAS REMOVED USING A SPIDER DEVICE. A NON-MEDTRONIC DEVICE WAS THEN DEPLOYED SUCCESSFULLY. NO OTHER TREATMENT WAS DONE TO THE LESION. NO FURTHER PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15127790 ↗

Other Coronary drug-eluting stent devices

All Coronary drug-eluting stent devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page