Skip to content

Onyx Frontier™ ONYXNG45022UXRecalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · STENT ONYXNG45022UX ONYX 4.50X22RX · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Onyx Frontier (71)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000511753), received between Jul 26, 2023 and Oct 30, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
  • Burst Container or Vessel1
  • Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Entrapment of Device1
  • Inflation Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 30, 2025Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Deformation; Positioning Problem; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Deformation; Positioning Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE ONE ONYX FRONTIER CORONARY DRUG ELUTING STENT DEFORMED IN VIVO DURING POSITIONING/ADVANCEMENT. THE LESION BEING TREATED WAS NON-TORTUOUS, MODERATELY CALCIFIED IN THE OSTIUM OF THE RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). NEGATIVE PREP WAS PERFORMED PRIOR TO USE WITH NO ISSUES. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE STENT. INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND (IVUS) WAS CONDUCTED, AND IT WAS NOTED THAT THE DEGREE OF CALCIUM WAS UNDERESTIMATED. THE STENT DID NOT CROSS THE LESION ON THE FIRST ATTEMPT, SO IT WAS REMOVED TO PREVENT FURTHER DILATION. UPON INSPECTION PRIOR TO REINSERTION, THE STENT WAS NOTICED TO BE BUNCHED UP ON BALLOON. IT WAS STATED THAT THE ISSUE WAS ATTRIBUTED TO THE CALCIUM PRESENT,NOT THE STENT ITSELF. A NON-MEDTRONIC GUIDE EXTENSION CATHETER AND A NEW STENT WERE USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23424865 ↗
  • InjuryNov 27, 2023Burst Container or Vessel; Inflation Problem; Difficult to Remove; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Burst Container or Vessel; Inflation Problem; Difficult to Remove; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO HOSPITAL WITH A MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO USE ONE ONYX FRONTIER CORONARY DRUG ELUTING STENT TO TREAT A MILDLY TORTUOUS, MILDLY CALCIFIED LESION WITH 90% LESION STENOSIS LOCATED IN THE PROXIMAL RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED WITH NO ISSUES NOTED. NEGATIVE PREP WAS PERFORMED WITH NO ISSUES. THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED WITH A 3.0MM NON-MEDTRONIC BALLOON. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. RESISTANCE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS NOT USED DURING DELIVERY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT INFLATION DIFFICULTIES WERE EXPERIENCED DURING STENT DEPLOYMENT. THE STENT WAS IN THE RCA BUT WOULD NOT INFLATE ABOVE 4 ATM. THE BALLOON KEPT POPPING LIKE THE BALLOON HAD BURST. A COUPLE OF INFLATIONS WERE ATTEMPTED, AND THE INDEFLATOR WAS REMOVED AND A NEW ONE TRIED, BUT THE STENT STILL WOULDN¿T INFLATE. IT WAS POSSIBLE TO REMOVE THE WHOLE SYSTEM WITH THE STENT PARTIALLY DEPLOYED BACK TO GROIN. USING THE LEFT GROIN, THE LESION WAS RE-WIRED AN D A 4.0X22MM ONYX FRONTIER STENT WAS PLACED, FIXING THE ARTERY. THE PATIENT WAS THEN FLOWN TO ANOTHER FACILITY WITH THE SHEATH AND GUIDE SEWN I

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18210526 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 26, 2023Entrapment of Device; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Entrapment of Device; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO USE ONE ONYX FRONTIER DRUG ELUTING STENT (DES) TO TREAT A SEVERELY CALCIFIED AND NON TORTUOUS LESION LOCATED IN THE OSTIUM OF RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). NO DAMAGE WAS NOTED TO THE PACKAGING OF THE DEVICE. NO ISSUES WERE NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE HOOP/TRAY. THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED WITH NO ISSUES BEING NOTED. NEGATIVE PREP WAS NOT PERFORMED ON THE DEVICE. THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE. EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS USED DURING DELIVERY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENT DISLODGED DURING DELIVERY TO/AT LESION. THE ONYX FRONTIER STUCK TO THE WIRE. THE STENT WIRE WAS PULLED OUT WITH THE WIRE. THE PATIENT IS ALIVE, WITH NO INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17394725 ↗

Other Coronary drug-eluting stent devices

All Coronary drug-eluting stent devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page