Skip to content

Onyx Frontier™ ONYXNG50022UXRecalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · STENT ONYXNG50022UX ONYX 5.00X22RX · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Onyx Frontier (71)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00763000511814), received between Jan 12, 2024 and Jan 12, 2024 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 12, 2024Difficult to Advance; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Material Deformation; Difficult to Advance; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Material Deformation

    THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO HOSPITAL WITH DECLINING LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION AND SHORTNESS OF BREATH (ANGINA), FOR DIAGNOSTIC CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION. INDICATION FOR PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI) WAS ANGINA AND CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO USE ONE ONYX FRONTIER CORONARY DRUG ELUTING STENT (DES) TO TREAT A MODERATELY TORTUOUS, MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION WITH 80% STENOSIS IN THE PROXIMAL RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED WITH NO ISSUES. NEGATIVE PREP WAS NOT PERFORMED. THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED WITH A 4.0X12MM BALLOON TO 14ATM. THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. RESISTANCE WAS NOTED WHILE ADVANCING THE DEVICE. EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS NOT USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT DEFORMATION OCCURRED IN VIVO DURING POSITIONING/ADVANCEMENT. THE RCA WAS ENGAGED WITH A 6F GUIDE CATHETER. A 300CM 0.014 NON-MEDTRONIC (MDT) GUIDEWIRE WAS ADVANCED BEYOND THE CULPRIT LESION, DISTALLY IN THE VESSEL, WITHOUT COMPLICATION. INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND (IVUS) WAS PERFORMED WITH A NON-MDT DEVICE. DIFFICULTY WAS NOTED DURING ADVANCEMENT OF THE ONYX FRONTIER DEVICE THROUGH A TELESCOPE GUIDE EXTENSION CATHETER BEFORE IT REACHED THE VESSEL. T

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18501555 ↗

Other Coronary drug-eluting stent devices

All Coronary drug-eluting stent devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page