O-arm O2 BI70002000 (UDI 00763000616502)Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · O-ARM SYS BI70002000 O2 UE 240V H EN ENA^ · Class 2
All models of O-arm O2 (2)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000616502), received between May 21, 2024 and Mar 26, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Advance4
- Application Program Problem1
- Computer Software Problem1
- Display or Visual Feedback Problem1
- Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings1
- Material Deformation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 26, 2026Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING AN IMAGING SYSTEM BEING USED INTRA-OPERATIVELY DURING A CERVICAL SPINE PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A NAVIGATION ACCURACY PROBLEM. AFTER TWO SCANS WERE DONE AND TRANSFERRED TO THE NAVIGATION SYSTEM, IT SHOWED INCONSISTENCIES IN ACCURACY. PHYSICIAN CONTINUED PROCEDURE WITH FREEHAND TECHNIQUE, NAVIGATION WAS ABORTED. THE INACCURACY AMOUNT WAS BETWEEN 3-5 MILLIMETERS (MM). NO KNOWN IMPACT TO PATIENT OUTCOME. THERE WAS A LESS THAN ONE HOUR SURGICAL DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24698804 ↗MalfunctionFeb 9, 2026Failure to Advance
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING AN IMAGING SYSTEM BEING USED IN AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SYSTEM WOULD NOT OPEN FULLY. THERE WAS NO REPORTED IMPACT ON PATIENT OUTCOME.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24292961 ↗MalfunctionNov 19, 2025Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING AN IMAGING SYSTEM BEING USED IN AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WERE MOVEMENT ISSUES, THE DOOR WOULD NOT OPEN.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23593285 ↗MalfunctionAug 19, 2025Failure to Advance; Material Deformation; Failure to Advance; Material Deformation
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING AN IMAGING SYSTEM BEING USED INTRAOPERATIVELY DURING A POSTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ROTOR ROTATION AND DOOR OPEN WAS NOT RESPONDING. ADDITIONALLY, THE INNER BOTTOM GANTRY COVER AND LEXAN COVER ON THE BOTTOM LEFT WERE BROKEN. THERE WAS A REPORTED DELAY TO THE PROCEDURE OF 20-30 MINUTES DUE TO THIS ISSUE BEFORE THE USE OF NAVIGATION WAS ABORTED. HOWEVER, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE CASE WAS PERFORMED WITH NAVIGATION. THE LAST CONFIRMATION SPIN WAS CANCELLED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED IMPACT ON PATIENT OUTCOME.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22842980 ↗MalfunctionNov 13, 2024Computer Software Problem; Display or Visual Feedback Problem; Application Program Problem; Computer Software Problem; Display or Visual Feedback Problem; Application Program Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING AN IMAGING SYSTEM BEING USED DURING A SACROILIAC AND THORACOLUMBAR PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MOBILE VIEW STATION (MVS) WAS STATING IT "CANNOT ENABLE" AND THAT THE IMAGE WAS ROTATED ON THE MOBILE VIEW STATION (MVS). 2DLF WAS ENABLED, HOWEVER SITE WERE NOT NEEDING 2DLF AND THEY WERE UNABLE TO DESELECT IT. AS A TROUBLESHOOTING STEP SITE CONFIRMED PATIENT WAS NOT ROTATED, ORIENTATION CHECKED AND LOOKED GOOD. THIS ISSUE OCCURRED INTRA OPERATIVELY AND CAUSED NO SURGICAL DELAY. THERE WAS NO REPORTED IMPACT TO THE PATIENT OUTCOME.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20672131 ↗MalfunctionMay 21, 2024Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING AN IMAGING SYSTEM BEING USED DURING A SACROILIAC AND THORACOLUMBAR PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO CLOSE THE SYSTEM AROUND THE PATIENT, THE GANTRY DOORS WOULD NOT FULLY CLOSE. THERE WAS NO VISIBLE DAMAGE TO THE SYSTEM AND NO OBJECT BLOCKING THE SYSTEM FROM CLOSING. TECHNICAL SERVICES (TS) HAD THE SITE RESTART THE SYSTEM, FULLY OPEN THE GANTRY DOORS, AND THEN ATTEMPT TO CLOSE AGAIN. THE ISSUE REMAINED UNRESOLVED. THERE WAS A REPORTED DELAY TO THE PROCEDURE OF MORE THAN 1 HOUR DUE TO THIS ISSUE BEFORE THE USE OF IMAGING WAS ABORTED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED IMPACT ON PATIENT OUTCOME.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19365545 ↗
Other Image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system, mobile devices
- O-ARM® BI70002000Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · Image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system, mobile2 recalls2,132 reports
- O-ARM® BI70000028120Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · Image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system, mobile1,343 reports
- O-ARM® BI70002000Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · Image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system, mobile2 recalls1 death811 reports
- O-ARM® BI70002000Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · Image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system, mobile259 reports
- Zenition Zenition 70Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · Image-Intensified Fluoroscopic X-Ray System, Mobile2 recalls80 reports
- O-armTM O2 Imaging System BI70002000Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · Image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system, mobile2 recalls1 death72 reports
- Zenition Zenition 50Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. · Image-Intensified Fluoroscopic X-Ray System, Mobile3 recalls21 reports
- O-ARM® BI70002000Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · Image-intensified fluoroscopic x-ray system, mobile2 recalls65 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page