Skip to content

TrailBlazer™ SC-035-135 (UDI 00763000762810)Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · PS SC-035-135 TRAILBLAZER V06 · Class 2

All models of TrailBlazer (4)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000762810), received between Apr 18, 2024 and Feb 16, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (3 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K092299); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component3
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Difficult to Remove1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 16, 2026Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LEG REVASCULARIZATION PROCEDURE INVOLVING THE TRAILBLAZER SUPPORT CATHETER, THE PHYSICIAN ENCOUNTERED SEVERE CALCIFICATION IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. SEVERE RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE. THE PHYSICIAN EXPERIENCED REMOVAL DIFFICULTIES AS THE CATHETER BECAME STUCK AND COULD NOT BE REMOVED. UPON APPLYING ADDITIONAL FORCE, THE CATHETER BROKE. THE PHYSICIAN SUCCESSFULLY SNARED THE CATHETER, ENSURING NOTHING WAS LEFT BEHIND IN THE PATIENT, AND CONFIRMED THERE WAS NO VESSEL DAMAGE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW MEDTRONIC DEVICE, RESULTING IN ONLY A MINIMAL DELAY OF A FEW MINUTES. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24343329 ↗
  • InjuryDec 18, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING THE TRAILBLAZER SUPPORT CATHETER, DETACHMENT OF THE DISTAL 10 CM OF THE CATHETER OCCURRED WITHIN THE VESSEL. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MID LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY AND WAS DESCRIBED AS SEVERELY CALCIFIED. THE DETACHED CATHETER COMPONENT WAS REMOVED BY SNARING, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY ABORTED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23838374 ↗
  • InjuryApr 18, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO USE A TRAILBLAZER SUPPORT CATHETER DURING PROCEDURE TO TREAT A PLAQUE LESION IN THE PATIENTS RIGHT PROXIMAL S UPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). THERE WERE NO ABNORMALITIES REPORTED IN RELATION TO ANATOMY. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO PACKAGING, I.E. SHELF CARTON, HOOP/TRAY. THE IFU (INSTRUCTION FOR USE) WAS FOLLOWED DURING PREPARATION, PROCEDURE, POST-PROCEDURE WITHOUT ISS UE. EMBOLIC PROTECTION WAS NOT USED. THE VESSEL WAS NOT PRE OR POST DILATED. THE DEVICE WAS NOT PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. NO RESISTANCE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE. IT WAS REPORTED THE TIP OF TRAILBLAZER SUPPORT CATHETER DETACHED IN PATIENTS VESSEL. A SNARE WAS USED TO REMOVE DETACHED COMPONENT. A REPLACEMENT NON-MEDTRONIC DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19132411 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K092299. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0497-2010 · Nov 6, 2009 · Terminated
    TrailBlazer Support Catheter, ev3 inc, 4600 Nathan Lane North, Plymouth, MN 55442-2920, Rx Only, Sterile EO. US Model Numbers: SC-014-135, SC-018-090, SC-035-065, SC-035-135, SC-

Other Catheter, percutaneous devices

All Catheter, percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page