Skip to content

Penditure™ LAAC35Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · CLIP PENDITURE LAAC35 · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000791445), received between Jan 22, 2025 and Jan 7, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Mechanical Problem1

Patient problems

  • Atrial Fibrillation1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 7, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THROUGH THE CLIP-IT CLINICAL POST-MARKET STUDY, THAT FOLLOWING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING USE OF THE PENDITURE CLIP ON (B)(6) 2025 THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD ATRIAL FIBRILLATION ON (B)(6) 2025. PATIENT WILL BE SEEING E LECTROPHYSIOLOGIST AND HAS RE-STARTED ELIQUIS. THE OUTCOME OF THE ADVERSE EVENT IS RECOVERING/RESOLVING. THE ADVERSE EVENT WAS DEEMED BY THE INVESTIGATOR AS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE PENDITURE CLIP DEVICE, BUT NOT RELATED TO THE PENDITURE DELIVERY SYSTEM. THE ADVERSE EVENT WAS DEEMED BY THE SPONSOR AS POSSIBLY NOT RELATED TO THE PENDITURE CLIP DEVICE OR THE PENDITURE DELIVERY SYSTEM.

    Patient problems: Atrial Fibrillation

    MAUDE report 23988076 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 22, 2025Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING USE OF A PENDITURE DEVICE , IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CLIP MIGRATED. A 35MM CLIP WAS PLACED WITH NORMAL PRESSURES AND THE LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE (LAA) WAS CUT WITH NO BLEEDING - NO INITIAL ISSUES. THE CUSTOMER RE-EVALUATED PENDITURE POST OP CAB BYPASSES AND NOTICED THE CLIP HAD MOVED AT TIP END. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THERE WAS STILL NO BLEEDING AND NO RECAPTURE DUE TO FACT THAT LAA HAD BEEN CUT FOR DECOMPRESSION. IT WAS LEFT IN PLACE WITH NO FURTHER ECHO EVALUATION. THE CUSTOMER HAD USED AN INFERIOR APPROACH. THE DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. MEDTRONIC RECEIVED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT THE PATIENT WAS OFF PUMP WHEN THE CLIP WAS PLACED. THE TISSUE WAS OF AVERAGE THICKNESS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUSTOMER DID NOT USE THE SIZER TO CONFIRM THE CLIP SIZE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21206620 ↗

Other Left atrial appendage clip, implantable devices

All Left atrial appendage clip, implantable devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.