HexaPulse™ PF Generator AFR-00008 (UDI 00763000871925)Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic, Inc. · GENERATOR AFR-00008 HEXAPULSE PF US · Class 3
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000871925), received between Sep 5, 2025 and Sep 25, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Communication or Transmission Problem” (1 report).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P240013); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
- Communication or Transmission Problem1
- Computer Operating System Problem1
- No Apparent Adverse Event1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 25, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
It was reported that during cardiac ablation procedure, issue with return 1 port was observed. It was noted that ¿Return 1 contact-quality-invalid error¿ message was displayed. Grounding patches were replaced without resolve. Adapter and gen link cable were replaced without resolution. Additionally, the system was rebooted multiple times, and the cable was reseated which did not resolve the i ssue. The procedure was aborted and was not continued with another system. Service was requested. Technical services initially requested replacement of the return electrode adapter. Pulsed field generator (PFG) issue was verified during servicing, and it was determined that the issue was related to pulsed field generator (PFG) only. Patient grounding block sheathing with wires. High impedance was confirmed on port 1 of the pulsed field generator (PFG). PFG Assembly was replaced. The console was serviced as appropriate. No further patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50900785 ↗InjuryMar 3, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS LATER REPORTED THAT ADDITIONAL ERRORS WERE RECEIVED INDICATING THE RETURN 1 CONTACT QUALITY WAS INVALID AND THAT THERE WAS A TEMPERATURE ACQUISITION CIRCUIT FAILURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24497797 ↗InjuryFeb 16, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO A CARDIAC ABLATION PROCEDURE, THE FRONT OF THE PULSE FIELD GENERATOR (PFG) WAS DAMAGED. THE ABLATION RETURN LINK CABLE WAS REPORTED TO BE "RIPPED" OUT OF THE FRONT OF THE SYSTEM. THE PROCEDURE WAS UNABLE TO START AND THE PATIENT WAS ALREADY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA WHEN THE CASE WAS ABORTED. TECHNICAL SERVICES RECOMMENDED SERVICE FOR REPLACEMENT OF THE PFG. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24347972 ↗InjuryDec 17, 2025Communication or Transmission Problem; Computer Operating System Problem; Communication or Transmission Problem; Computer Operating System Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CARDIAC ABLATION PROCEDURE, A PULSE FIELD GENERATOR(PFG)/CATHETER INTERFACE UNIT (CIU) ERROR OCCURRED, AND A CIU FIRMWARE VERSION MISMATCH. THE COMMUNICATION CABLES WERE RECONNECTED WITHOUT RESOLVE. THE ELECTROGRAM SIGNALS DROPPED WHILE RESPIRATION CONTINUED. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, THE CASE WAS EXITED AND RE-ENTERED ALONG WITH REBOOTING AND RESULTED IN NOT BEING ABLE TO PACE. THE CATHETER TEMPERATURE SENSOR FAULT LED TO THE CATHETER BEING REPLACED TWO TIMES, WITH THE ERROR NOT CONSISTENTLY ASSOCIATED WITH ONE ELECTRODE. THE PROCEDURE WAS ABORTED WHILE THE PATIENT WAS UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA. THE PATIENT RECEIVED TREATMENT FOR PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION (PVI) AND DID NOT GET PRE-EMPTIVE CAVOTRICUSPID ISTHMUS (CTI) ABLATION FOR TYPICAL FLUTTER. SERVICE RECOMMENDED REPLACEMENT OF THE PFG/CIU. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23832228 ↗InjurySep 10, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT PULSED FIELD ABLATIONS WERE BEING UTILIZED AROUND THE LEFT PULMONARY VEINS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23017151 ↗InjurySep 5, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; No Apparent Adverse Event; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; No Apparent Adverse Event
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CARDIAC ABLATION PROCEDURE, THE CASE WAS ABORTED AFTER TRANSSEPTAL DEVICE USAGE DUE TO CATHETER TEMPERATURE SENSOR FAULT. THE PROCEDURE WAS UNABLE TO DELIVER ENERGY BECAUSE OF A PULSE FIELD GENERATOR (PFG) FAULT. THE PATIENT WAS UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA AND NO ABLATION WAS POSSIBLE DURING THE ENTIRE PROCEDURE. TROUBLESHOOTING STEPS INCLUDED CHANGING ELECTRICAL CABLES, CHANGING THE SPHERE 9 CATHETER, REBOOTING THE SYSTEM, REDOING THE PREPARATION SEQUENCE, MAPPING, PACING, CREATING A NEW PROCEDURE, AND CONTACTING TECHNICAL SUPPORT. A NEW PFG WAS INSTALLED THE FOLLOWING DAY AND NO FURTHER ISSUES WERE OBSERVED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22975297 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P240013. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1948-2026 · Mar 11, 2026 · Open, ClassifiedMedtronic Sphere-9 Catheter, Model Number AFR-00001; catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial flutter.
Other Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation devices
- TactiCath™ A-TCSE-DFSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation1 recall23 deaths923 reports
- TactiCath™ PN-004075St. Jude Medical, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation7 deaths338 reports
- TactiFlex™ Sensor Enabled™ A-TFSE-DFSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation1 recall6 deaths241 reports
- TactiCath™ A-TCSE-FJSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation1 recall3 deaths174 reports
- Sphere-9™ Catheter AFR-00001Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation1 recall3 deaths147 reports
- TactiCath™ A-TCSE-DSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation2 deaths175 reports
- TactiSys™ PN-004400St. Jude Medical, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation1 recall125 reports
- QDOT MICRO D139402Biosense Webster Inc · Catheter, percutaneous, cardiac ablation, for treatment of atrial fibrillation3 deaths171 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page