AQUACEL FOAM 421561Recalls & reported problems
Convatec, Purchasing Department · FoamLite™ ConvaTec 15Cm x 15Cm · Class 1
All models of AQUACEL FOAM (12)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00768455142248), received between Feb 7, 2025 and Feb 7, 2025 — classified as 10 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (10 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Remove10
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions10
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 7, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
THE END USER REPORTED THAT SHE EXPERIENCED THE BANDAGE BEEN TOO ADHESIVE AND STUCK TOO WELL TO THE SURROUNDING SKIN AND DID NOT CAME OFF. ALL PRODUCTS OUT OF BOX OF TEN HAD BEEN IMPACTED AND USED BY PATIENT. THEY HAD USED THE PRODUCT FOR A LONG TIME, AND NO PREPARATION WAS USED. THE DURATION OF USE WAS NORMALLY UP TO ONE WEEK BUT DEPENDED ON SEVERAL THINGS. THERE WAS NEITHER HARM ALLEGED TO PATIENT NOR ANY DAMAGE TO PROPERTY. PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE LOT NUMBER OF THE PRODUCT WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21332797 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
THE END USER REPORTED THAT SHE EXPERIENCED THE BANDAGE BEEN TOO ADHESIVE AND STUCK TOO WELL TO THE SURROUNDING SKIN AND DID NOT CAME OFF. ALL PRODUCTS OUT OF BOX OF TEN HAD BEEN IMPACTED AND USED BY PATIENT. THEY HAD USED THE PRODUCT FOR A LONG TIME, AND NO PREPARATION WAS USED. THE DURATION OF USE WAS NORMALLY UP TO ONE WEEK BUT DEPENDED ON SEVERAL THINGS. THERE WAS NEITHER HARM ALLEGED TO PATIENT NOR ANY DAMAGE TO PROPERTY. PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE LOT NUMBER OF THE PRODUCT WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21332796 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
THE END USER REPORTED THAT SHE EXPERIENCED THE BANDAGE BEEN TOO ADHESIVE AND STUCK TOO WELL TO THE SURROUNDING SKIN AND DID NOT CAME OFF. ALL PRODUCTS OUT OF BOX OF TEN HAD BEEN IMPACTED AND USED BY PATIENT. THEY HAD USED THE PRODUCT FOR A LONG TIME, AND NO PREPARATION WAS USED. THE DURATION OF USE WAS NORMALLY UP TO ONE WEEK BUT DEPENDED ON SEVERAL THINGS. THERE WAS NEITHER HARM ALLEGED TO PATIENT NOR ANY DAMAGE TO PROPERTY. PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE LOT NUMBER OF THE PRODUCT WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21332795 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
THE END USER REPORTED THAT SHE EXPERIENCED THE BANDAGE BEEN TOO ADHESIVE AND STUCK TOO WELL TO THE SURROUNDING SKIN AND DID NOT CAME OFF. ALL PRODUCTS OUT OF BOX OF TEN HAD BEEN IMPACTED AND USED BY PATIENT. THEY HAD USED THE PRODUCT FOR A LONG TIME, AND NO PREPARATION WAS USED. THE DURATION OF USE WAS NORMALLY UP TO ONE WEEK BUT DEPENDED ON SEVERAL THINGS. THERE WAS NEITHER HARM ALLEGED TO PATIENT NOR ANY DAMAGE TO PROPERTY. PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE LOT NUMBER OF THE PRODUCT WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21332794 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
THE END USER REPORTED THAT SHE EXPERIENCED THE BANDAGE BEEN TOO ADHESIVE AND STUCK TOO WELL TO THE SURROUNDING SKIN AND DID NOT CAME OFF. ALL PRODUCTS OUT OF BOX OF TEN HAD BEEN IMPACTED AND USED BY PATIENT. THEY HAD USED THE PRODUCT FOR A LONG TIME, AND NO PREPARATION WAS USED. THE DURATION OF USE WAS NORMALLY UP TO ONE WEEK BUT DEPENDED ON SEVERAL THINGS. THERE WAS NEITHER HARM ALLEGED TO PATIENT NOR ANY DAMAGE TO PROPERTY. PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE LOT NUMBER OF THE PRODUCT WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21332793 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
THE END USER REPORTED THAT SHE EXPERIENCED THE BANDAGE BEEN TOO ADHESIVE AND STUCK TOO WELL TO THE SURROUNDING SKIN AND DID NOT CAME OFF. ALL PRODUCTS OUT OF BOX OF TEN HAD BEEN IMPACTED AND USED BY PATIENT. THEY HAD USED THE PRODUCT FOR A LONG TIME, AND NO PREPARATION WAS USED. THE DURATION OF USE WAS NORMALLY UP TO ONE WEEK BUT DEPENDED ON SEVERAL THINGS. THERE WAS NEITHER HARM ALLEGED TO PATIENT NOR ANY DAMAGE TO PROPERTY. PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE LOT NUMBER OF THE PRODUCT WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21332792 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
THE END USER REPORTED THAT SHE EXPERIENCED THE BANDAGE BEEN TOO ADHESIVE AND STUCK TOO WELL TO THE SURROUNDING SKIN AND DID NOT CAME OFF. ALL PRODUCTS OUT OF BOX OF TEN HAD BEEN IMPACTED AND USED BY PATIENT. THEY HAD USED THE PRODUCT FOR A LONG TIME, AND NO PREPARATION WAS USED. THE DURATION OF USE WAS NORMALLY UP TO ONE WEEK BUT DEPENDED ON SEVERAL THINGS. THERE WAS NEITHER HARM ALLEGED TO PATIENT NOR ANY DAMAGE TO PROPERTY. PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE LOT NUMBER OF THE PRODUCT WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21332791 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
THE END USER REPORTED THAT SHE EXPERIENCED THE BANDAGE BEEN TOO ADHESIVE AND STUCK TOO WELL TO THE SURROUNDING SKIN AND DID NOT CAME OFF. ALL PRODUCTS OUT OF BOX OF TEN HAD BEEN IMPACTED AND USED BY PATIENT. THEY HAD USED THE PRODUCT FOR A LONG TIME, AND NO PREPARATION WAS USED. THE DURATION OF USE WAS NORMALLY UP TO ONE WEEK BUT DEPENDED ON SEVERAL THINGS. THERE WAS NEITHER HARM ALLEGED TO PATIENT NOR ANY DAMAGE TO PROPERTY. PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE LOT NUMBER OF THE PRODUCT WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21332790 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
THE END USER REPORTED THAT SHE EXPERIENCED THE BANDAGE BEEN TOO ADHESIVE AND STUCK TOO WELL TO THE SURROUNDING SKIN AND DID NOT CAME OFF. ALL PRODUCTS OUT OF BOX OF TEN HAD BEEN IMPACTED AND USED BY PATIENT. THEY HAD USED THE PRODUCT FOR A LONG TIME, AND NO PREPARATION WAS USED. THE DURATION OF USE WAS NORMALLY UP TO ONE WEEK BUT DEPENDED ON SEVERAL THINGS. THERE WAS NEITHER HARM ALLEGED TO PATIENT NOR ANY DAMAGE TO PROPERTY. PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE LOT NUMBER OF THE PRODUCT WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21332785 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
THE END USER REPORTED THAT SHE EXPERIENCED THE BANDAGE BEEN TOO ADHESIVE AND STUCK TOO WELL TO THE SURROUNDING SKIN AND DID NOT CAME OFF. ALL PRODUCTS OUT OF BOX OF TEN HAD BEEN IMPACTED AND USED BY PATIENT. THEY HAD USED THE PRODUCT FOR A LONG TIME, AND NO PREPARATION WAS USED. THE DURATION OF USE WAS NORMALLY UP TO ONE WEEK BUT DEPENDED ON SEVERAL THINGS. THERE WAS NEITHER HARM ALLEGED TO PATIENT NOR ANY DAMAGE TO PROPERTY. PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE LOT NUMBER OF THE PRODUCT WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21332784 ↗
Other Dressing, wound, occlusive devices
- DUODERM 187957Convatec, Purchasing Department · Dressing, Wound, Occlusive4,342 reports
- DUODERM 187955Convatec, Purchasing Department · Dressing, Wound, Occlusive1 recall2,348 reports
- DUODERM 187660Convatec, Purchasing Department · Dressing, Wound, Occlusive207 reports
- DUODERM 187961Convatec, Purchasing Department · Dressing, Wound, Occlusive153 reports
- SAM Chest Seal CS203-ENSAM Medical Products · Dressing, Wound, Occlusive1 recall0 reports
- DUODERM 187662Convatec, Purchasing Department · Dressing, Wound, Occlusive43 reports
- ALLEVYN LIFE L 15.4X15.4 CTN10 66801069Smith & Nephew Medical Limited · Dressing, Wound, Occlusive28 reports
- ALLEVYN LIFE SACRUM (LARGE) PACK OF 10 66801307Smith & Nephew Medical Limited · Dressing, Wound, Occlusive28 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page