RECONIX 0114115Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00801741011818), received between Nov 14, 2025 and Nov 14, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryNov 14, 2025Migration; Migration

  PER INFORMATION PROVIDED: ON (B)(6) 2004 ¿ PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH RECURRENT RIGHT FLANK VENTRAL HERNIA THEREBY UNDERWENT LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR WITH IMPLANT OF RECONIX MESH (DEVICE 1). PER OPERATIVE NOTES, ¿MULTIPLE ADHESIONS WERE TAKEN DOWN. A RECONIX MESH (DEVICE 1) WAS PLACED AND SUTURED INTO THE DEFECT.¿ ON (B)(6) 2004 ¿ PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH RIGHT FLANK RECURRENT HERNIA THEREBY UNDERWENT OPEN REPAIR WITH IMPLANT OF RECONIX MESH (DEVICE 2) AND BARD FLAT MESH (DEVICE 3). PER OPERATIVE NOTES, ¿THE SCAR TISSUE WAS EXCISED. THE OLD RECONIX MESH (DEVICE 1) WAS IDENTIFIED, AND DISSECTION REVEALED A HERNIA. THE HERNIA SAC WAS DISSECTED. IN THE PERITONEAL SIDE OF THE HERNIA, A RECONIX MESH (DEVICE 2) WAS PLACED AND SUTURED. A BARD FLAT MESH (DEVICE 3) WAS PLACED AND TACKED.¿ ON (B)(6) 2006 ¿ PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH RIGHT FLANK RECURRENT INCISIONAL HERNIA THEREBY UNDERWENT OPEN REPAIR WITH REMOVAL OF MESHES (DEVICE 1, 2, 3) AND AN IMPLANT OF DULEX MESH (DEVICE 4). PER OPERATIVE NOTES, ¿A SIGNIFICANT ADHESIOLYSIS OF THE RIGHT COLON THAT WAS ADHERED TO THE HERNIA SAC ITSELF. THERE WAS ANOTHER PRIOR MESH WAS SEEN THAT SEEMED TO HAVE HAD FALLEN AWAY FROM PART OF THE WALL. THE MULTI

  Patient problems: Adhesion(s); Hernia; Scar Tissue

  MAUDE report 23553281 ↗