Skip to content

DULEX 0118241Recalls & reported problems

Davol Inc. · Bard Dulex Mesh · Class 2 · Implant

All models of DULEX (10)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741011870), received between Jun 12, 2018 and Apr 28, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defective Device” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Defective Device2
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1
  • Patient-Device Incompatibility1

Patient problems

  • Pain2
  • Abnormal Vaginal Discharge1
  • Adhesion(s)1
  • Erosion1
  • Hernia1
  • Scar Tissue1
  • Sepsis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 28, 2025Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH DULEX MESH FOR A HERNINA REPAIR. THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A BULGE FROM HERNIA AND PAIN. AS REPORTED, "HE NEVER HEALED FROM THE HERNIA PROCEDURE AND WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE ANOTHER ONE TO REMOVE THE MESH, BUT PROVIDER LEFT IN AND SNIPPED THE CORNERS AND HAD TO HAVE A DRAIN TUBE AS WELL AND BECAME SEPTIC. WE WAITED ANOTHER 6-8 WEEKS AND HAD TO HAVE ANOTHER PROVIDER REMOVE THE MESH BY ANOTHER PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2016.

    Patient problems: Pain; Sepsis

    MAUDE report 21918544 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 21, 2025Defective Device; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Defective Device; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    PER INFORMATION PROVIDED: (B)(6)2010 - PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH INCISIONAL HERNIA THEREBY UNDERWENT LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR WITH THE IMPLANT OF DULEX MESH (DEVICE #1). PER OPERATIVE NOTES, ¿IN THE LEFT LOWER QUADRANT, SOME DENSE ADHESIONS TO THE SAC WERE DIVIDED. THERE WAS AN ADDITIONAL SUPERIOR ASPECT HERNIA JUST TO THE RIGHT OF MIDLINE WAS IDENTIFIED, ADHESIONS WERE DIVIDED. A CUTANEOUS BRIDGE WHICH HAD AN OLD PIECE OF MESH WAS DIVIDED, AND A DULEX MESH (DEVICE #1) WAS PLACED AND SUTURED.¿ (B)(6)2012 - PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH RECURRENT RIGHT FLANK HERNIA THEREBY UNDERWENT OPEN REPAIR WITH THE PARTIAL REMOVAL OF DULEX MESH (DEVICE #1) AND IMPLANT OF VENTRALIGHT ST MESH (DEVICE #2). PER OPERATIVE NOTES, ¿AFTER EXTENSIVE LYSIS OF ADHESIONS, THE HERNIA SAC WAS DISSECTED. THE PREVIOUS MESH (DEVICE #1) WAS RESECTED AND REMOVED. A VENTRALIGHT ST MESH (DEVICE #2) WAS PLACED AND SUTURED.¿ (B)(6)2015 - PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH MULTI-RECURRENT VENTRAL INCISIONAL HERNIA THEREBY UNDERWENT OPEN REPAIR WITH THE EXPLANT OF DULEX MESH (DEVICE #1) AND IMPLANT OF SYNTHETIC MESH. PER OPERATIVE NOTES, ¿THE HERNIA SAC WAS FOUND HERNIATED INTO THE SIGMOID COLON. THE ADHESIONS WERE LYSED, AND HERNIA

    Patient problems: Adhesion(s); Hernia; Scar Tissue

    MAUDE report 21431423 ↗
  • InjuryJun 12, 2018Defective Device; Defective Device

    THE FOLLOWING WAS ALLEGED BY THE PATIENT'S ATTORNEY AND MEDICAL RECORDS: ON (B)(6) 2007: THE PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE, VAGINAL RELAXATION, ABNORMAL BLEEDING, RIGHT ADNEXAL MASS AND UNDERWENT A TWO PART PROCEDURE WHICH INCLUDED TOTAL ABD HYSTERECTOMY, BILAT SALPINGO-OOPHORECTOMY, AN ABD SACROCOLPOPEXY WITH IMPLANT OF A BARD/DAVOL DULEX MESH TO REDUCE ENTEROCELE AND IMPLANT OF A TENSION-FREE VAGINAL TAPE USING A NON BARD/DAVOL "GYNECARE TVT" MESH SLING. ON (B)(6) 2009: THE PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH EROSION OF VAGINAL MESH AND UNDERWENT A PARTIAL EXCISION OF THE VAGINAL MESH AND CLOSURE OF THE VAGINA. PER OPERATIVE DICTATION "2CM AREA A GRANULATION TISSUE WAS NOTED AT THE APEX OF THE VAGINA AND WAS TRIMMED AWAY. IT WAS NOTED AT THAT TIME, THERE WAS A 1CM AREA OF "SUSPENSION MESH" THAT WAS PRESENT IN THE CENTER OF THIS AREA THAT HAD TO GRANULATION TISSUE IN IT. THE MESH (DULEX) WAS GRASPED, ALL OF WHICH APPEARED TO BE RETROPERITONEAL AND EXCISED IN SEVERAL SMALL PIECES. ALL VISIBLE MESH WAS REMOVED". THE PATIENT IS REPORTED TO HAVE HAD PERSISTENT VAGINAL PAIN AND DRAINAGE. ON (B)(6) 2015: THE PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH ERODED MESH INTO VAGINA AND UNDERWEN

    Patient problems: Abnormal Vaginal Discharge; Erosion; Pain

    MAUDE report 7591172 ↗

Other Mesh, surgical, polymeric devices

All Mesh, surgical, polymeric devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page