GlidePath Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter with Preloaded Stylet 5393310Recalls & reported problems
Bard Access Systems, Inc. · GLIDEPATH HEMODIALYSIS CATH, ST, DL, 14.5 FR. 31cm · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741012204), received between Apr 23, 2019 and Mar 12, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Expulsion” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Expulsion2
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
- Material Protrusion/Extrusion2
- Stretched2
- Break1
- Defective Component1
- Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
- Difficult to Insert1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- Skin Erosion2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 12, 2026Stretched; Expulsion; Material Protrusion/Extrusion; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
ON (B)(6) 2026, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE USING GLIDEPATH HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER. POST THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE CVC CUFF HAD EXTRUDED AND WAS EXPOSED. REPORTEDLY, THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT WAS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Skin Erosion
MAUDE report 24577508 ↗MalfunctionFeb 27, 2026Stretched; Expulsion; Material Protrusion/Extrusion; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
ON (B)(6) 2026, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE USING GLIDEPATH HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER. POST THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE CVC CUFF HAD EXTRUDED AND WAS EXPOSED. REPORTEDLY, THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT WAS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Skin Erosion
MAUDE report 24468017 ↗MalfunctionDec 13, 2024Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Low Test Results; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Low Test Results
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SOMETIME POST A DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT, WHEN BLOOD WAS COLLECTED FROM DEVICE, THE BLOOD TEST RESULTS WERE ALLEGEDLY FAINT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20923170 ↗MalfunctionNov 28, 2023Difficult to Insert; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Material Twisted/Bent; Difficult to Insert; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Material Twisted/Bent
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE VIA THE LEFT JUGULAR VEIN APPROACH, THE FOLDED PART OF THE CATHETER WAS ALLEGEDLY TWISTED AND KINKED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE BLOOD WAS ALLEGEDLY NOT DRAINING WELL, AND THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED COMPLETELY. REPORTEDLY, THE CATHETER WAS TRIED TO BE REINSERTED USING SELDINGER TECHNIQUE BUT WAS NOT POSSIBLE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18215005 ↗MalfunctionJun 7, 2022Restricted Flow rate; Restricted Flow rate
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH RESULTS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL THAT APPROXIMATELY TWENTY ONE DAYS POST HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT EXPERIENCED AN ADVERSE EVENT OF CATHETER ALLEGEDLY HAD A LOW FLOW RATE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED AND EXCHANGED SUCCESSFULLY. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14613878 ↗MalfunctionApr 23, 2019Break; Defective Component; Break; Defective Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PREPARATION FOR DIALYSIS CATHETER INSERTION, THE CONNECTING PIECE FROM THE STYLET HUB ALLEGEDLY BROKE OFF. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8541901 ↗
Other Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted devices
- Palindrome 8888145014Mozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted1 recall312 reports
- Palindrome 8888145015Mozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted2 recalls1 death219 reports
- HemoStar Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter 5833690Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted2 deaths290 reports
- Palindrome 8888119369PMozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted3 recalls1 death14 reports
- HemoStar Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter 5833730Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted1 death141 reports
- GlidePath Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter with Preloaded Stylet 5393230Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted5 deaths138 reports
- Palindrome 8888123404PMozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted2 recalls1 death17 reports
- Palindrome 8888119364PMozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted2 recalls1 death17 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page