Skip to content

GlidePath Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter with Preloaded Stylet 5393310Recalls & reported problems

Bard Access Systems, Inc. · GLIDEPATH HEMODIALYSIS CATH, ST, DL, 14.5 FR. 31cm · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741012204), received between Apr 23, 2019 and Mar 12, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Expulsion” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Expulsion2
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
  • Material Protrusion/Extrusion2
  • Stretched2
  • Break1
  • Defective Component1
  • Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
  • Difficult to Insert1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • Skin Erosion2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Patient Involvement1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 12, 2026Stretched; Expulsion; Material Protrusion/Extrusion; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    ON (B)(6) 2026, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE USING GLIDEPATH HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER. POST THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE CVC CUFF HAD EXTRUDED AND WAS EXPOSED. REPORTEDLY, THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT WAS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Skin Erosion

    MAUDE report 24577508 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 27, 2026Stretched; Expulsion; Material Protrusion/Extrusion; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    ON (B)(6) 2026, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE USING GLIDEPATH HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER. POST THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE CVC CUFF HAD EXTRUDED AND WAS EXPOSED. REPORTEDLY, THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT WAS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Skin Erosion

    MAUDE report 24468017 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 13, 2024Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Low Test Results; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Low Test Results

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SOMETIME POST A DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT, WHEN BLOOD WAS COLLECTED FROM DEVICE, THE BLOOD TEST RESULTS WERE ALLEGEDLY FAINT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20923170 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 28, 2023Difficult to Insert; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Material Twisted/Bent; Difficult to Insert; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE VIA THE LEFT JUGULAR VEIN APPROACH, THE FOLDED PART OF THE CATHETER WAS ALLEGEDLY TWISTED AND KINKED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE BLOOD WAS ALLEGEDLY NOT DRAINING WELL, AND THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED COMPLETELY. REPORTEDLY, THE CATHETER WAS TRIED TO BE REINSERTED USING SELDINGER TECHNIQUE BUT WAS NOT POSSIBLE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18215005 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 7, 2022Restricted Flow rate; Restricted Flow rate

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH RESULTS OF A CLINICAL TRIAL THAT APPROXIMATELY TWENTY ONE DAYS POST HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT EXPERIENCED AN ADVERSE EVENT OF CATHETER ALLEGEDLY HAD A LOW FLOW RATE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED AND EXCHANGED SUCCESSFULLY. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14613878 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 23, 2019Break; Defective Component; Break; Defective Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PREPARATION FOR DIALYSIS CATHETER INSERTION, THE CONNECTING PIECE FROM THE STYLET HUB ALLEGEDLY BROKE OFF. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8541901 ↗

Other Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted devices

All Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page