GlidePath Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter 5396240Recalls & reported problems
Bard Access Systems, Inc. · GLIDEPATH HEMODIALYSIS CATH, ALPHACURVE, DL, 14.5 FR. 24cm · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741012259), received between Dec 5, 2022 and Mar 4, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deformation Due to Compressive Stress” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Deformation Due to Compressive Stress3
- Fracture3
- Stretched2
- Contamination /Decontamination Problem1
- Difficult to Insert1
- Failure to Advance1
- Fluid/Blood Leak1
- Material Integrity Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 4, 2026Fracture; Material Separation; Stretched; Failure to Advance; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE USING THE GLIDEPATH HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE GUIDEWIRE COULD NOT PASS THROUGH THE INTRODUCER NEEDLE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24514133 ↗MalfunctionJul 9, 2025Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT FOR A DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE USING GLIDEPATH. DURING A GLIDEPATH DIALYSIS CATHETER PROCEDURE, THE CATHETER WAS KINKED WHEN INSERTED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT A NEW PRODUCT WAS USED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT INCIDENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22454883 ↗MalfunctionMar 25, 2024Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE CATHETER TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS ALLEGEDLY DAMAGED WHEN CONNECTING THE CATHETER TO THE TUNNELER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18967029 ↗MalfunctionDec 9, 2023Nonstandard Device; Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Nonstandard Device; Contamination /Decontamination Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO A DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, A HAIR WAS ALLEGEDLY PRESENT LAYING ON TOP OF THE CATHETER LINE INSIDE THE PROTECTIVE PACKAGE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18298122 ↗MalfunctionSep 16, 2023Fracture; Difficult to Insert; Stretched; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Fracture; Difficult to Insert; Stretched; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THERE WAS STRONG RESISTANCE FELT DURING INSERTING THE GUIDEWIRE, AFTER PUNCTURING THE NEEDLE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY BROKEN UPON REMOVAL. REPORTEDLY, ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17761954 ↗MalfunctionDec 5, 2022Fluid/Blood Leak; Fracture; Fluid/Blood Leak; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO A CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE LUER-LOCK CONNECTOR OF THE CATHETER WAS ALLEGEDLY CRACKED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE SALINE WAS ALLEGEDLY LEAKED UPON FLUSHING. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15913473 ↗
Other Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted devices
- Palindrome 8888145014Mozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted1 recall312 reports
- Palindrome 8888145015Mozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted2 recalls1 death219 reports
- HemoStar Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter 5833690Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted2 deaths290 reports
- Palindrome 8888119369PMozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted3 recalls1 death14 reports
- HemoStar Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter 5833730Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted1 death141 reports
- GlidePath Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter with Preloaded Stylet 5393230Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted5 deaths138 reports
- Palindrome 8888123404PMozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted2 recalls1 death17 reports
- Palindrome 8888119364PMozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, hemodialysis, implanted2 recalls1 death17 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page