Skip to content

Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent 788424Recalls & reported problems

C. R. Bard, Inc. · INLAY OPTIMA URETERAL STENT W/O GUIDEWIRE · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Bard InLay Optima Ureteral Stent (21)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741015670), received between Feb 14, 2018 and Sep 28, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Material Fragmentation2
  • Calcified1
  • Component Misassembled1
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1
  • Positioning Failure1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Information1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 28, 2026Component Misassembled

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50924430 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 26, 2026Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DOCTOR OPENED THE PACKAGE STERILE PACKAGING AND FOUND A HAIR INSIDE, CONCLUDING THAT THE PRODUCT WAS CONTAMINATED AND UNUSABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25641976 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 23, 2026Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT CUSTOMER STATED THAT A DOUBLE J URETERAL STENT, 24 CM, 4.7 FR, PART NUMBER 788424, BROKE DURING INSERTION. THEY DID NOT HAD THE PART IN STOCK, BUT THEY COULD ORDER IT FOR THE CUSTOMER. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 19 JAN 2026, STATED THAT NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT HEALTH. IT WAS JUST BEING PUT IN PLACE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24172974 ↗
  • InjuryNov 7, 2025Calcified; Calcified

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY FOR KIDNEY STONES, DURING WHICH A URETERAL STENT (788424) WAS PLACED. ONE MONTH AFTER STENT PLACEMENT, THE STENT BECAME DIFFICULT TO REMOVE, AND UPON REMOVAL, A STONE WAS FOUND INSIDE THE STENT. SURGICAL INTERVENTION WAS CHOSEN TO REMOVE THE STENT, WHICH WAS SUCCESSFULLY PERFORMED, AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SMOOTHLY. NO ACTUAL SAMPLES OR PHOTOGRAPHS WERE AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 23497744 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 25, 2022Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BOTH PIGTAILS OF STENT HAD BROKE OFF.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14496131 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 30, 2021Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT TRANSURETHRAL RIGHT URETERAL STENT REMOVAL ON (B)(6) 2021, DURING WHICH RIGHT URETERAL EDEMA AND URETERAL STRICTURE WERE OBSERVED, AS WELL AS A LARGE NUMBER OF STONES ATTACHED TO THE DOUBLE TUBE. STATED THAT IT MADE DIFFICULTY IN EXTUBATION OF THE CATHETER AND FURTHER URETHRAL MUCOSAL INJURY AND BLEEDING. AFTER ACTIVE TREATMENT AFTER SURGERY, THE PATIENT WAS OBSERVED TO HAVE A GOOD RECOVERY.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 11754210 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 19, 2021Positioning Failure; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Positioning Failure; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL OF THE STENT DID NOT RECOIL IN TO POSITION. STATED THAT AFTER PLACING THE STENT THE UROLOGIST USED IMAGE GUIDANCE TO CONFIRM THE POSITION OF THE PRODUCT AND NOTED THAT THE COIL WHICH HOLD THE STENT IN PLACE DID NOT RECOIL. CUSTOMER PROCEED WITH SECOND PLACEMENT AND SAME INCIDENT OCCURRED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11683814 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 3, 2019Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL AT THE END OF THE URETERAL STENT WAS RIPPED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8477773 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 14, 2018Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENT WIRE BROKE IN HALF AS IT WAS BEING INSERTED INTO THE PATIENT DURING SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 7269410 ↗

Other STENT, URETERAL devices

All STENT, URETERAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page