Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent 788814Recalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · INLAY OPTIMA URETERAL STENT W/O GUIDEWIRE · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Bard InLay Optima Ureteral Stent (21)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741015885), received between Sep 6, 2023 and Sep 28, 2023 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Fragmentation3
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 28, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WITH A TRANSPLANTED KIDNEY NEEDED PERCUTANEOUS STENTING OF THE URETER. DURING PLACEMENT, A CATHETER WAS USED TO PUSH THE STENT INTO PLACE IN THE URETER OVER A STIFF GUIDEWIRE. DESPITE THE STIFFNESS OF THE GUIDEWIRE, WHICH CANNOT BE STIFFER DUE TO VULNERABLE TISSUE IN THE KIDNEY, THE RADIOPAQUE TIP OF THE CATHETER BROKE AND MUST HAVE BEEN LEFT INSIDE THE RENAL PELVIS FOR FUTURE SURGICAL REMOVAL. PER FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM IBC ON 18AUG2023, STATED THAT THE BROKEN OFF TIP OF THE PUSH CATHETER WAS EXTRACTED FROM THE KIDNEY SURGICALLY VIA PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY. THE EXTRACTED BROKEN OFF TIP WAS NOT STERILIZED, BUT IT WAS IN A SMALL CONTAINER. THERE WAS NO CYTOTOXIC MATERIAL, BUT IT MIGHT HAVE TRACES OF BLOOD. THE PATIENT IMPACT WAS THAT THE PATIENT HAD TO UNDERGO A PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (PNL) PROCEDURE IN GENERAL ANESTHESIA, WHERE THEY EXTRACTED THE BROKEN OFF TIP VIA A PERCUTANEOUS ACCESS INTO THE KIDNEY PELVIS. NO COMPLICATIONS HAPPENED DURING THIS PROCEDURE, BUT THERE WAS INHERENT RISK ASSOCIATED WITH IT. THERE WERE TWO OTHER OCCURRENCES OF TIPS BREAKING OFF AND THEY COULD BE EXTRACTED WITH CYSTOSCOPIC ACCESS THROUGH THE URETER
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 17836076 ↗InjurySep 27, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WITH A TRANSPLANTED KIDNEY NEEDED PERCUTANEOUS STENTING OF THE URETER. DURING PLACEMENT, A CATHETER WAS USED TO PUSH THE STENT INTO PLACE IN THE URETER OVER A STIFF GUIDEWIRE. DESPITE THE STIFFNESS OF THE GUIDEWIRE, WHICH CANNOT BE STIFFER DUE TO VULNERABLE TISSUE IN THE KIDNEY, THE RADIOPAQUE TIP OF THE CATHETER BROKE AND MUST HAVE BEEN LEFT INSIDE THE RENAL PELVIS FOR FUTURE SURGICAL REMOVAL. PER FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM IBC ON 18AUG2023, STATED THAT THE BROKEN OFF TIP OF THE PUSH CATHETER WAS EXTRACTED FROM THE KIDNEY SURGICALLY VIA PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY. THE EXTRACTED BROKEN OFF TIP WAS NOT STERILIZED, BUT IT WAS IN A SMALL CONTAINER. THERE WAS NO CYTOTOXIC MATERIAL, BUT IT MIGHT HAVE TRACES OF BLOOD. THE PATIENT IMPACT WAS THAT THE PATIENT HAD TO UNDERGO A PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (PNL) PROCEDURE IN GENERAL ANESTHESIA, WHERE THEY EXTRACTED THE BROKEN OFF TIP VIA A PERCUTANEOUS ACCESS INTO THE KIDNEY PELVIS. NO COMPLICATIONS HAPPENED DURING THIS PROCEDURE, BUT THERE WAS INHERENT RISK ASSOCIATED WITH IT. THERE WERE TWO OTHER OCCURRENCES OF TIPS BREAKING OFF AND THEY COULD BE EXTRACTED WITH CYSTOSCOPIC ACCESS THROUGH THE URETER
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 17823876 ↗InjurySep 6, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WITH A TRANSPLANTED KIDNEY NEEDED PERCUTANEOUS STENTING OF THE URETER. DURING PLACEMENT, A CATHETER WAS USED TO PUSH THE STENT INTO PLACE IN THE URETER OVER A STIFF GUIDEWIRE. DESPITE THE STIFFNESS OF THE GUIDEWIRE, WHICH CANNOT BE STIFFER DUE TO VULNERABLE TISSUE IN THE KIDNEY, THE RADIOPAQUE TIP OF THE CATHETER BROKE AND MUST HAVE BEEN LEFT INSIDE THE RENAL PELVIS FOR FUTURE SURGICAL REMOVAL. PER FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM IBC ON 18AUG2023, STATED THAT THE BROKEN OFF TIP OF THE PUSH CATHETER WAS EXTRACTED FROM THE KIDNEY SURGICALLY VIA PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY. THE EXTRACTED BROKEN OFF TIP WAS NOT STERILIZED, BUT IT WAS IN A SMALL CONTAINER. THERE WAS NO CYTOTOXIC MATERIAL, BUT IT MIGHT HAVE TRACES OF BLOOD. THE PATIENT IMPACT WAS THAT THE PATIENT HAD TO UNDERGO A PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (PNL) PROCEDURE IN GENERAL ANESTHESIA, WHERE THEY EXTRACTED THE BROKEN OFF TIP VIA A PERCUTANEOUS ACCESS INTO THE KIDNEY PELVIS. NO COMPLICATIONS HAPPENED DURING THIS PROCEDURE, BUT THERE WAS INHERENT RISK ASSOCIATED WITH IT. THERE WERE TWO OTHER OCCURRENCES OF TIPS BREAKING OFF AND THEY COULD BE EXTRACTED WITH CYSTOSCOPIC ACCESS THROUGH THE URETER
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 17690280 ↗
Other STENT, URETERAL devices
- Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent 788426C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL1 recall100 reports
- Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent 788626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL122 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent with HydroGlide™ Guidewire 777626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL118 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent with HydroGlide™ Guidewire 777426C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL108 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent 778626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL100 reports
- Percuflex™ Plus M0061752530Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL1 death99 reports
- Contour VL™ M0061801560Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL1 recall45 reports
- Polaris™ Ultra M0061921330Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL71 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page