Bardia® Urethral Catheter 802412Recalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bardia® Urethral Catheter - Red Rubber · Class 2
All models of Bardia Urethral Catheter (7)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741018343), received between Jun 28, 2017 and Mar 18, 2021 — classified as 1 injury, 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Misassembled” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Misassembled3
- No Flow2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Biocompatibility1
- Defective Device1
- Device Damaged Prior to Use1
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
- Incorrect Measurement1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Discomfort1
- Pain1
- Patient Problem/Medical Problem1
- Skin Irritation1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 18, 2021Biocompatibility; Biocompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED TWO INFECTIONS AND BELIEVED IT IS FROM THE BARDIA URETHRAL CATHETER PRODUCT. THE PATIENT ALSO SAID WHEN THE ORDER WAS ARRIVED IT APPEARED TO HAVE BEEN RAINED ON AND IT SEEMED THE BOX WAS RETAPED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 11518567 ↗MalfunctionDec 30, 2020Material Protrusion/Extrusion; Material Protrusion/Extrusion
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WERE BUMPS ON THE CATHETER AND THOSE WERE VERY VISIBLE. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD ONE TO RETURN IF NEEDED, BUT HAD BEEN REUSING THEM SINCE BEING LOW ON SUPPLIES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 11098339 ↗MalfunctionDec 23, 2020Sharp Edges; Sharp Edges
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE 12 FRENCH STRAIGHT TIP CATHETERS WERE PIERCED LIKE A KNIFE AND HENCE, IT COULD NOT BE USED. THE PATIENT NEEDED A 14 FRENCH COUDE CATHETERS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 11065394 ↗MalfunctionJun 26, 2020Incorrect Measurement; Incorrect Measurement
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETERS WERE IN DIFFERENT SIZES WHICH WERE NOT CONSISTENT AND ALSO NOTED THAT IT HURTS THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 10200511 ↗MalfunctionJan 3, 2020Misassembled; Misassembled; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THE CATHETERS WERE ALL SQUARE , AND CAUSED DISCOMFORT. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED.
Patient problems: Discomfort
MAUDE report 9547201 ↗MalfunctionSep 9, 2019Misassembled; No Flow; Misassembled
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER HAD NO EYELETS, WHICH RESTRICTED THE FLOW. THE PATIENT ALLEGED THAT HE DID NOT NOTICE THE DEVICE DID NOT HAVE EYELETS UNTIL HE INSERTED THE DEVICE AND NO URINE FLOWED, WHERE HE SAW A SMALL AMOUNT OF BLOOD.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; Patient Problem/Medical Problem
MAUDE report 8976485 ↗MalfunctionJul 25, 2018Misassembled; Defective Device; No Flow; Misassembled
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WERE NO DRAINAGE HOLES IN THE CATHETER. THE PATIENT ATTEMPTED TO USE THE CATHETER BUT SOON REALIZED THAT THE CATHETER DID NOT DRAIN.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7720125 ↗MalfunctionJul 24, 2018Device Damaged Prior to Use; Patient-Device Incompatibility; Material Integrity Problem; Device Damaged Prior to Use
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF THE CATHETER HAD A SHARP EDGE. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED SKIN IRRITATION. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; Skin Irritation
MAUDE report 7716314 ↗MalfunctionJun 28, 2017Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS SMALLER THAN USUAL.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6675060 ↗
Other CATHETER, UROLOGICAL devices
- Magic3™ Coude Intermittent Catheter with Sure-Grip™ Sleeve 50614C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL883 reports
- Magic3™ Intermittent Catheter with Sure-Grip™ Sleeve 53614GC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL692 reports
- Magic3™ Coude Intermittent Catheter with Sure-Grip™ Sleeve 50616C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL2 deaths443 reports
- GENTLECATH GLIDE 421567Convatec, Purchasing Department · Catheter, Urological342 reports
- Magic3™ Intermittent Catheter with Sure-Grip™ Sleeve 53616GC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL301 reports
- Bardex® Foley Catheter Silicone Coated 0167V22SC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL187 reports
- Bardex® Foley Catheter Silicone Coated 0167V20SC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL175 reports
- Bardia® Coude Olive Tip Urethral Foley Catheter 802516C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL170 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page