Bardex® Lubricath® Foley Catheter Hotter Model 6003L22Recalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bardex® Lubricath® Hotter Model Foley Catheter Red Latex Radiopaque Coude Tip 3 Way Continuous Irrigation Lubricious Coated · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741018886), received between Nov 7, 2025 and Feb 26, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Inaccurate Flow Rate” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Inaccurate Flow Rate6
- Complete Blockage1
- Material Rupture1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
- Discomfort1
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 26, 2026Inaccurate Flow Rate
IT WAS REPORTED BY UROLOGY OVER THE PREVIOUS FOUR MONTHS THAT THIS LATEX FOLEY CATHETER WAS NOT FUNCTIONING CORRECTLY. THE DR. HAD TWO PATIENTS IN PACU WHOSE CATHETERS FAILED (UNABLE TO DRAIN THEIR BLADDER) (DR. PT 2), AND THE DR. HAD THREE PATIENTS WITH THE SAME ISSUE (DR. PT 1, DR. PT 2, DR. PT 3). TODAY, THEY FIRST TESTED THIS CATHETER (IN THE PICTURE) ON THE BACK TABLE TO SEE IF BOTH OPENINGS WERE PATENT; ONE WAS PATENT, BUT THE SECOND (THE LOWER PORT ON THE FOLEY) WAS NOT. THEN CONNECTED IT TO THE ANESTHESIA AIR INSUFFLATOR TO SEE IF IT WAS SIMPLY STUCK, BUT IT FAILED AGAIN. THE DR. AND CUSTOMER AGREED TO OPEN ANOTHER CATHETER FROM THE SAME LOT TO DETERMINE WHETHER THERE WAS A TREND, AND THAT CATHETER WORKED. HOWEVER, BEFORE THE PATIENT WAS READY TO LEAVE THE ROOM, THE FLOW STOPPED AGAIN. A SMALL PIECE OF TISSUE FROM THE TURP WAS FOUND IN IT, BUT SINCE THE DR. WAS ALREADY CONCERNED ABOUT THE RELIABILITY OF THIS CATHETER AND CHANGED IT TO A DIFFERENT ONE. THE 22F 3WAY COUDE FOLEY HAD BEEN RECEIVING MULTIPLE COMPLAINTS FROM BOTH DRS. TODAY, THE DR. REPORTED ANOTHER ISSUE. THE PATIENT IN PACU HAD NOT BEEN HAVING ADEQUATE OUTPUT OR GOOD CBI FOLLOWING AQUABLATION. THE DR. REMOVED T
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24461048 ↗MalfunctionFeb 26, 2026Inaccurate Flow Rate
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
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24461047 ↗MalfunctionFeb 26, 2026Inaccurate Flow Rate
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
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24456402 ↗MalfunctionFeb 26, 2026Complete Blockage
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
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24456401 ↗MalfunctionFeb 26, 2026Inaccurate Flow Rate
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
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24456400 ↗MalfunctionFeb 26, 2026Inaccurate Flow Rate
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
Patient problems: Discomfort; Pain
MAUDE report 24456026 ↗InjuryNov 17, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SILICONE URINARY CATHETER BALLOON NUMBER 22 APPEARS TO HAVE BURST INSIDE THE BLADDER, CAUSING IT TO BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. ONCE ANALYZED AND TESTED, THE BALLOON WITH A 30 ML CAPACITY WAS INDEED FOUND TO BE NON-EXISTENT. PER CUSTOMER FOLLOW UP INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA EMAIL ON 06FEB2026, IT WAS REPORTED THAT SOME INFORMATION WAS MISSING, BUT THE FOLLOWING DETAILS HAD BEEN RECEIVED. THE BALLOON OF THE URINARY CATHETER, 3-WAY PORGES 100% SILICONE URINARY CATHETER, SIZE 22, 50 ML, LOT 09698842 APPEARED TO HAVE BURST INSIDE THE BLADDER, RESULTING IN ITS IMMEDIATE REMOVAL. UPON ANALYSIS AND TESTING, THE BALLOON WAS CONFIRMED TO BE MISSING. THE COMPLETE MEMBRANE OF THE INFLATED BALLOON WITH 30 ML FOR THE SAME 3-WAY PORGES 100% SILICONE URINARY CATHETER, SIZE 22, 50 ML, LOT 09698842, WAS NOT FOUND AND WAS PRESUMED TO BE INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BLADDER. THE UROLOGIST HAD BEEN CONTACTED, BUT THE FOLLOW UP FROM THAT CONSULTATION WAS NOT AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 23572954 ↗MalfunctionNov 7, 2025Inaccurate Flow Rate; Inaccurate Flow Rate
IT WAS REPORTED THAT URINARY FOLEY CATHETER INSERTED ACCORDING TO PROPER TECHNIQUE WITH 10 ML IN THE BALLOON NO DRAINAGE, IRRIGATION POSSIBLE. CATHETER REMOVED. SECOND CATHETER INSERTED NO DRAINAGE IRRIGATION POSSIBLE; WHEN STAFF ATTEMPT TO REMOVE THE WATER FROM THE BALLOON, CATHETER COLLAPSES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23501367 ↗
Other CATHETER, UROLOGICAL devices
- Magic3™ Coude Intermittent Catheter with Sure-Grip™ Sleeve 50614C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL883 reports
- Magic3™ Intermittent Catheter with Sure-Grip™ Sleeve 53614GC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL692 reports
- Magic3™ Coude Intermittent Catheter with Sure-Grip™ Sleeve 50616C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL2 deaths443 reports
- GENTLECATH GLIDE 421567Convatec, Purchasing Department · Catheter, Urological342 reports
- Magic3™ Intermittent Catheter with Sure-Grip™ Sleeve 53616GC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL301 reports
- Bardex® Foley Catheter Silicone Coated 0167V22SC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL187 reports
- Bardex® Foley Catheter Silicone Coated 0167V20SC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL175 reports
- Bardia® Coude Olive Tip Urethral Foley Catheter 802516C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, UROLOGICAL170 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page