Skip to content

BardPort 0603006Recalls & reported problems

Bard Access Systems, Inc. · BardPort Titanium Implantable Port with Attachable 14.3F Open-Ended Single-Lumen Peritoneal Catheter (No Cuff) Basic Kit · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741025792), received between May 10, 2019 and Mar 18, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Difficult to Flush1
  • Fracture1
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1
  • Material Separation1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 18, 2026Difficult to Flush

    ON (B)(6) 2026, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PORT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE USING THE PERITONEAL PORT. DURING THE PROCEDURE IT WAS NOTED THAT THE DEVICE COULD NOT BE FLUSHED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24629360 ↗
  • InjuryMay 8, 2022Fracture; Material Separation; Migration; Fracture; Material Separation; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY ONE YEAR AND FOUR MONTHS POST PORT IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF THE CATHETER WAS ALLEGEDLY MIGRATED INTO THE SIGMOID COLON. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO CATHETER MIGRATION. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 14332450 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 16, 2022Loose or Intermittent Connection; Loose or Intermittent Connection

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SOME TIME POST PORT PLACEMENT, THE CATH-LOCK OVER SLEEVE ALLEGEDLY DISCONNECTED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT INTRAPERITONEAL ADMINISTRATION HAD BEEN COMPLETED WHEN THE CATH-LOCK OVER SLEEVE WAS FOUND TO HAVE DISCONNECTED. REPORTEDLY, DUE TO THE SHIFT TO PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, THE PORT SYSTEM AND THE CATH-LOCK OVER SLEEVE WERE NOT REMOVED. THE DEVICE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT AND SHIFTED TO PALLIATIVE CARE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13540111 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 24, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES ONE MALFUNCTION. A REVIEW OF THE REPORTED INFORMATION INDICATED THAT CATH-LOCK OVER SLEEVE OF A MODEL 0603006 IMPLANTABLE PORT ALLEGEDLY DISCONNECTED . THIS INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A SINGLE SOURCE. THE ALLEGED MALFUNCTION INVOLVED A PATIENT WITH NO KNOWN IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE A 37-YEAR-OLD FEMALE, WEIGHT WAS NOT REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8822138 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 17, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES ONE MALFUNCTION. A REVIEW OF THE REPORTED INFORMATION INDICATED THAT PART OF A MODEL 0603006 PORT & CATHETER WAS ALLEGEDLY NOT REMOVED BY PHYSICIAN. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT PATIENT ALLEGEDLY DEVELOPED AN ALLERGIC REACTION TO THE CATHETER. THIS INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A SINGLE SOURCE. THE ALLEGED MALFUNCTION INVOLVED A PATIENT WITH NO KNOWN IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT AGE, WEIGHT, AND GENDER WERE NOT PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8800099 ↗
  • InjuryMay 10, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY THREE MONTHS POST PORT PLACEMENT ON THE LEFT SIDE DISTAL TO THE SEVENTH RIB, A PORTION OF THE PORT WAS ALLEGEDLY REMOVED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY TEN YEARS POST PORT REMOVAL, THE PATIENT ALLEGED A SMALL PAINFUL FLUID-FILLED AREA NEAR THE SITE OF THE PERITONEAL PORT. FURTHER, A CT SCAN ALLEGEDLY IDENTIFIED A 7-8MM DENSE MAN MADE FOREIGN OBJECT, POSSIBLY THE COLLAR THAT CONNECTED THE PORT TO THE CATHETER, UNDERNEATH THE SKIN OF THE SAME LOCATION. REPORTEDLY, A NEW PORT WILL BE PLACED AT WHICH TIME THE FOREIGN OBJECT WILL BE REMOVED. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTEDLY STABLE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Pain

    MAUDE report 8600938 ↗

Other PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR devices

All PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.