Skip to content

X-Port, ChronoFlex 0655870Recalls & reported problems

Bard Access Systems, Inc. · X-Port Titanium Low-Profile Implantable Port with Attachable 6F ChronoFlex Open-Ended Single-Lumen Venous Catheter Microintroducer Kit · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741026331), received between Jul 25, 2019 and Mar 18, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fluid/Blood Leak” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fluid/Blood Leak4
  • Fracture3
  • Material Puncture/Hole2
  • Component Missing1
  • Defective Component1
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Obstruction of Flow1
  • Suction Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Extravasation1
  • No Patient Involvement1
  • Thrombosis/Thrombus1
  • Thrombus1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 18, 2025Fluid/Blood Leak; Fracture; Material Puncture/Hole; Suction Problem; Difficult to Advance; Fluid/Blood Leak; Fracture; Material Puncture/Hole; Suction Problem; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH LITIGATION PROCESS THAT SOMETIME LATER PORT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE; THE CATHETER ALLEGEDLY HAD FRACTURED, AND THE PATIENT HAD ALSO ALLEGEDLY DEVELOPED WITH INFECTION AND THROMBOSIS. HOWEVER, THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Extravasation; Thrombosis/Thrombus; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 21628764 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 21, 2025Fluid/Blood Leak; Defective Component; Obstruction of Flow; Fluid/Blood Leak; Defective Component; Obstruction of Flow

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SOMETIMES POST A PORT PLACEMENT, LEAK WAS IDENTIFIED IN HUBBER NEEDLE TUBING AND THE BRANCH OFF THE LEUR LOCK SITE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT PORT WAS ALLEGEDLY CLOTTED. ADDITIONALLY, THE NEEDLE WAS ALLEGEDLY TOO SHORT AND BECAUSE OF THIS LEAKAGE OCCURRED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21429541 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 21, 2023Fluid/Blood Leak; Material Puncture/Hole; Fluid/Blood Leak; Material Puncture/Hole

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ONE MONTH AND EIGHT DAYS POST PORT PLACEMENT, A HOLE WAS ALLEGEDLY FOUND IN THE CATHETER. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE DRUG HAD ALSO FLOWED INTO THE TISSUE. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED PAIN. HOWEVER, THERE IS NO INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDING ADDITIONAL MEDICAL INTERVENTION NOR MEDICATION PRESCRIBED TO TREAT THE PAIN. REPORTEDLY THE PORT WAS REMOVED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16580454 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 6, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ONE MONTH AND EIGHT DAYS POST PORT PLACEMENT, THE TEAR ALLEGEDLY OCCURRED AT ABOUT 50 CM AND WAS IDENTIFIED UNDER FLUOROSCOPY USING A CONTRAST AGENT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED ARM PAIN AND WARM AT FIRST DUE TO TEAR. REPORTEDLY, THE PORT SYSTEM WAS REMOVED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16485832 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 26, 2020Component Missing; Component Missing

    THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES ONE MALFUNCTION. A REVIEW OF THE REPORTED INFORMATION INDICATED THAT THE MODEL 0655870 IMPLANTABLE PORT ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED GUIDEWIRE MISSING. THIS INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM ONE SOURCE. THIS MALFUNCTION DID NOT INVOLVE A PATIENT AS THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT. THE PATIENT'S AGE, SEX AND WEIGHT WERE UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 10738073 ↗
  • InjuryJul 25, 2019Fluid/Blood Leak; Fracture; Fluid/Blood Leak; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SOME TIME POST PORT PLACEMENT IN A CUBITAL VEIN, A THROMBUS WAS ALLEGEDLY FORMED IN THE CATHETER IN THE SUBCLAVIAN VEIN, IDENTIFIED VIA MRI. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT UPON FLUOROSCOPY, A HOLE IN THE CATHETER APPROXIMATELY 5 TO 10 CM ABOVE THE PORT CHAMBER WAS ALLEGEDLY IDENTIFIED. REPORTEDLY, THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND ANOTHER DEVICE WAS PLACED IN THE OTHER ARM. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED STABLE POST REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Thrombus

    MAUDE report 8828513 ↗

Other PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR devices

All PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.