Skip to content

PowerPort M.R.I., ChronoFlex 1808051Recalls & reported problems

Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PowerPort isp M.R.I. Implantable Port with Attachable 8F ChronoFlex Open-Ended Single-Lumen Venous Catheter Microintroducer Kit (Without Suture Plugs) · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PowerPort M.R.I., ChronoFlex (22)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741027017), received between Aug 2, 2018 and Aug 5, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Blocked Connection” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Blocked Connection1
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Difficult to Flush1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1
  • Suction Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • Chest Pain1
  • Fungal Infection1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Tachycardia1
  • Thrombosis/Thrombus1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 5, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    It was reported through the litigation process that, sometime after the port placement, the patient was diagnosed with supraventricular tachycardia, acute chest pain, thrombosis and coronary artery disease. However, the current status of the patient was unknown.

    Patient problems: Chest Pain; Tachycardia; Thrombosis/Thrombus

    MAUDE report 50137965 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 10, 2025Suction Problem; Suction Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE LITIGATION PROCESS THAT SOMETIME POST A PORT PLACEMENT, THERE WAS NO BLOOD RETURN AND THE PORT MALFUNCTIONED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23507773 ↗
  • InjuryNov 7, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH LITIGATION PROCESS THAT SOMETIME POST A PORT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY DEVELOPED INFECTION. HOWEVER, THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20631040 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 3, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY THREE YEARS POST A PORT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED TINGLING SENSATION IN HER ARM. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20357138 ↗
  • InjuryApr 3, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH LITIGATION PROCESS THAT TWO YEARS THREE MONTHS AND EIGHT DAYS POST A PORT PLACEMENT, THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY DEVELOPED WITH FUNGAL INFECTION. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE INFECTED PORT WAS REMOVED. HOWEVER, THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Fungal Infection

    MAUDE report 19030566 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 6, 2023Difficult to Flush; Blocked Connection; Difficult to Flush; Blocked Connection

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SOMETIME POST PORT PLACEMENT, ALLEGEDLY UNABLE TO ACCESS THE PORT WITH THE NEEDLE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE LAST INFUSION ALLEGEDLY TOOK LONGER THAN USUAL. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17689546 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 17, 2020Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device

    THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES ONE MALFUNCTION. A REVIEW OF THE REPORTED INFORMATION INDICATED THAT MODEL 1808051 IMPLANTABLE PORT ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED MIGRATION. THIS INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM ONE SOURCE. THIS MALFUNCTION INVOLVED A PATIENT WITH NO CONSEQUENCES. AGE, WEIGHT, AND GENDER OF THE PATIENT WAS NOT PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10289330 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 26, 2019Material Twisted/Bent

    PT SCHEDULED FOR INSERTION OF A POWER PORT. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE INTRODUCER FROM THE POWER PORT SET (REF 1808051, LOT REDP0075, EXP 11/30/2020) BENT INTO A "WIGGLE" FORM RATHER THAN MAINTAINING ITS "STRAIGHT" INTEGRITY WHEN USED BY THE SURGEON. A REPLACEMENT INTRODUCER SET WAS OBTAINED AND UTILIZED. THE PT WAS PLACED INTO TRENDELENBURG TO PREVENT AN AIR EMBOLISM DURING THIS TRANSITION TIME. ULTIMATELY, THE POWER PORT WAS PLACED, CONFIRMED BY X-RAY AND PT WENT TO POST-OP AS SCHEDULED. FDA SAFETY REPORT ID# (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8935541 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 2, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PORT HAS ALLEGEDLY ROTATED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7744605 ↗

Other PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR devices

All PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page