Skip to content

PowerPort M.R.I. 1859661Recalls & reported problems

Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PowerPort isp M.R.I. Implantable Port with Pre-Attached 9.6F Open-Ended Single-Lumen Venous Catheter. Intermediate Kit (without Suture Plugs) · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PowerPort M.R.I. (8)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741027239), received between Feb 5, 2019 and Apr 14, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 2 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Fracture3
  • Break2
  • Difficult or Delayed Positioning1
  • Difficult or Delayed Separation1
  • Migration1
  • Reflux within Device1

Patient problems

  • Thrombosis/Thrombus3
  • Foreign Body In Patient2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Injury1
  • Pulmonary Embolism1
  • Sepsis1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 14, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE LITIGATION PROCESS THAT, SOMETIME AFTER THE PORT PLACEMENT, THE PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH THROMBOSIS. HOWEVER, THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT REMAINS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus

    MAUDE report 24872037 ↗
  • InjuryJan 14, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE LITIGATION PROCESS THAT, SOMETIME AFTER THE PORT PLACEMENT, THE PATIENT DEVELOPED PULMONARY EMBOLISM, SEPSIS, AND THROMBOSIS. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Pulmonary Embolism; Sepsis; Thrombosis/Thrombus

    MAUDE report 24065877 ↗
  • InjuryJan 13, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE LITIGATION PROCESS THAT APPROXIMATELY TWO YEARS AND THIRTY DAYS AFTER A PORT PLACEMENT, VIA THE INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN FOR LONG-TERM IV THERAPY AND BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS, THE PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH AN INFECTED PORT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE INFECTED PORT WAS REMOVED. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 24051838 ↗
  • InjuryMar 19, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE LITIGATION PROCESS THAT SOMETIME POST PORT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PORT CATHETER ALLEGEDLY FRACTURED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH THROMBOSIS. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT WAS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus

    MAUDE report 21640097 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 14, 2024Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Difficult or Delayed Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PORT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, WHEN SEPERATING THE BREAK AWAY SHEATH, IT ALLEGEDLY WOULD NOT BREAK OR SEPERATE. REPORTEDLY, THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO CUT IT WITH SCISSORS TO GET IT TO SEPERATE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19309794 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 4, 2024Fracture; Reflux within Device; Fracture; Reflux within Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PORT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE THE PLASTIC VALVE ON THE SHEATH WAS ALLEGEDLY FRACTURED RESULTING IN BACK BLEEDING WHICH WAS CONTROLLED WITH MANUAL PRESSURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18825154 ↗
  • InjuryNov 26, 2020Fracture; Migration; Fracture; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SOMETIMES POST PORT PLACEMENT, THE CATHETER ALLEGEDLY BROKE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER ALLEGEDLY MIGRATED INTO THE HEART. REPORTEDLY, THE PORT WAS REMOVED. THE PATIENT IS STABLE.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 10911022 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 5, 2019Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY FOUR MONTHS AFTER PORT-A-CATHETER PLACEMENT DURING INFUSION; THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED PAIN AND SWELLING. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT UNDER EVALUATION WITH RADIOLOGIST THE CATHETER ALLEGEDLY DEMONSTRATED A FRACTURE AND THE BROKEN SEGMENT WAS LOCATED IN THE SUPERIOR VENA CAVA. REPORTEDLY, A WEEK POST EVALUATION THE SEGMENT WAS REMOVED. THE FOLLOWING DAY THE PORT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED HOME WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO FOLLOW UP WITH ONCOLOGIST.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Injury

    MAUDE report 8308460 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 5, 2019Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY EIGHT MONTHS AFTER PORT-A-CATHETER PLACEMENT DURING A CHEST X-RAY; THE X-RAY DEMONSTRATED THE LEFT SUBCLAVIAN PORT-A-CATHETER WAS FRACTURED WITH THE DISTAL HALF OF THE CATHETER OVER THE RIGHT CARDIAC BORDER. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THE PORT AND THE PROXIMAL CATHETER IN LEFT CHEST WAS REMOVED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS. REPORTEDLY, THE DISTAL SEGMENT WAS RETAINED IN THE RIGHT ATRIUM AND WAS REMOVED A FEW DAYS AFTER THE PORT WAS REMOVED. THE PATIENT STATUS IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 8308451 ↗

Other PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR devices

All PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page