Skip to content

Bard® Urethral Catheter 120618Recalls & reported problems

C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bard® Tiemann Model Urethral Catheter Coude Tip · Class 2

All models of Bard Urethral Catheter (5)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741029981), received between Jun 6, 2019 and Jul 10, 2025 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Improper Chemical Reaction” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Improper Chemical Reaction3
  • Naturally Worn2
  • Component Misassembled1
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
  • Device Damaged Prior to Use1
  • Difficult to Insert1
  • Material Deformation1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Urinary Retention1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 10, 2025Improper Chemical Reaction; Improper Chemical Reaction

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT RUBBER OF THE INTERMITTENT CATHETER WAS A DIFFERENT COLOR AND THE PATIENT WAS HAVING TO USE TWO PACKS OF LUBRICANT PER CATHETER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22470663 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 7, 2022Improper Chemical Reaction; Naturally Worn; Improper Chemical Reaction; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THREE OF THE INTERMITTENT CATHETER WERE FOUND DRY ROTTED INSIDE OF A SEALED STERILE PACKAGE. THERE WERE 3 CATHETERS WITH SAME ISSUE- LOT# NGCP4279. PER SAMPLE RECEIVED ON 20JUN2022, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE CUSTOMER RETURNED THE TWO INTERMITTENT CATHETER WITH THE LOT# NGDP4073 FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14944244 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 5, 2022Material Twisted/Bent; No Apparent Adverse Event; Material Twisted/Bent; No Apparent Adverse Event

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF THE COUDE TIEMANN CATHETER WAS CURVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14915869 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 13, 2022Improper Chemical Reaction; Naturally Worn; Improper Chemical Reaction; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THREE OF THE INTERMITTENT CATHETER WERE FOUND DRY ROTTED INSIDE OF A SEALED STERILE PACKAGE. THERE WERE 3 CATHETERS WITH SAME ISSUE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14674766 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 1, 2021Component Misassembled; Component Misassembled

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT RECEIVED A EYE TIEMANN CATHETER WITHOUT EYELETS ON THE LAST ORDER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11603106 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 20, 2020Difficult to Insert

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT STATED HE HAD SEVERAL EPISODES OF NOT BEING ABLE TO INSERT THE CATHETERS. IT WAS UNKNOWN IF THE PATIENT WAS ABLE TO VOID.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; Urinary Retention

    MAUDE report 9862380 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 6, 2019Device Damaged Prior to Use; Device Damaged Prior to Use; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS DEFORMED. THE CUSTOMER NOTED THAT IT SEEMED LIKE THERE WAS SOMETHING STICKING OUT OF THE CATHETER.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8674325 ↗

Other CATHETER, UROLOGICAL devices

All CATHETER, UROLOGICAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page