SenoMark® Breast Tissue Marker SMTEC10GRecalls & reported problems
Senorx, Inc. · SENOMARK® Breast Tissue Marker, 10 Ga EnCor, Titanium "O" · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741031977), received between Feb 27, 2018 and May 7, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Break1
- Device Emits Odor1
- Difficult to Insert1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Positioning Failure1
- Separation Failure1
- Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 7, 2026Break; Positioning Failure
ON (B)(6) 2026, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BREAST TISSUE MARKER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE USING THE SENOMARK. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF THE SENOMARK BROKE OFF AND GOT STUCK IN THE NEEDLE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25111655 ↗MalfunctionSep 22, 2025Device Emits Odor; Device Emits Odor
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BIOPSY PROCEDURE USING ENCORE INSTRUMENT. DURING THIS PROCEDURE, THE ENCORE CODES WERE FOUND IN BOXES THAT EMITTED A FOUL ODOR, CAUSING ILLNESS AMONG THE LABELING STAFF, INCLUDING SYMPTOMS SUCH AS NAUSEA, GENERAL MALAISE, AND DIARRHEA. HOWEVER, THERE WERE NO REPORTED INJURIES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23106996 ↗MalfunctionSep 8, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
IT HAS BEEN REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A STEREOTACTIC GUIDANCE BIOPSY ALONG WITH THE PLACEMENT OF A BREAST TISSUE MARKER UTILIZING THE ENCORE AND SENOMARK MARKERS. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE'S NEEDLE BECAME STUCK IN THE PATIENT. ADDITIONALLY, IT WAS REPORTED WHETHER THE ISSUE WAS DUE TO A DEFECTIVE MARKER OR IF THE ENCORE DID NOT COMPLETELY ROTATE TO DETACH DURING THE BIOPSY. NO PATIENT INJURIES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22989975 ↗MalfunctionAug 4, 2022Difficult to Insert; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Insert; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BREAST BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY DIFFICULT TO INSERT TO BREAST. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15162088 ↗MalfunctionJul 16, 2020Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging
THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES ONE MALFUNCTION. A REVIEW OF THE MALFUNCTION INDICATED THAT MODEL SMTEC10G BREAST TISSUE MARKER ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED A TEAR IN THE PACKAGE. THIS REPORT WAS RECEIVED FROM ONE SOURCE. THIS MALFUNCTION DID NOT INVOLVE A PATIENT AS THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT. THE PATIENT'S AGE, WEIGHT, AND GENDER WERE NOT PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 10282895 ↗MalfunctionFeb 27, 2018Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING BREAST MARKER PLACEMENT UNDER STEREOTACTIC GUIDANCE, THE MARKER ALLEGEDLY REMAINED IN THE MARKER APPLICATOR. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7300773 ↗
Other MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE devices
- BioZorb F0202Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls192 reports
- BioZorb F0221Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE3 recalls15 reports
- BioZorb F0203Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls51 reports
- BioZorb F0231Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls19 reports
- BioZorb F0303Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls19 reports
- BioZorb F0304Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls19 reports
- BioZorb F0404Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls6 reports
- BioZorb F0331Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls4 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page